MovieChat Forums > El club (2015) Discussion > Fantastic Prismatic Angles on the Church...

Fantastic Prismatic Angles on the Church's Sex Scandal


Having seen a number of similar, but still important, movies which do the usual story-telling of victims and perps, I was fascinated to see one that zeroed in on the Church cover-up more closely.

Bottom line: these men and woman were being supported by the very powerful organization whose rules they'd violated. Yes, they were isolated from the populace and thus unlikely to sin again in precisely the same manners that brought them into exile. But still, they had their basic food, clothing and shelter provided, in a seaside locale no less. Thus some were comfortable enough to fall into an arrogant sense of justification for their crimes. Entitlement.

I found several moments impactful: their blithely singing and praying over the dead, bloodied body of their colleague. One priest bragging that his perverse sexual proclivities were superior to normal sex. The therapist-priest hesitating when the grown victim suggested that he too might be a pervert. The hetero love-making scene gone awry. The almost comical litany of addictive substances requisite to keep the victim afloat in his new abode.

I also found the murders of the dogs an effective stroke of innocence-lost and self-defeat.

reply

Agree. Good post. There was a remark during the film from Vidal to their guest inquisitor about dogs and men, which I forget now! But basically it was a remark about the humanity of a dog.

What was most awful in the film was the extent that the priests and sister of the house and the visiting priest were prepared to go to in order to cover up things to retain their various existences. The sheer arrogance of taking Sandokan, wounded at their instigation, into the house as penace, aargh!

But brilliant film.

I'm scared of the middle place between light and nowhere

reply

Yes ~ It really is the real deal.
Shall have to research interviews with the director ~ know of any? Thanks!

reply

interviews with the director ~ know of any?
No I don't, sorry.
He kicked me right in the middle of my daily routine

reply

There is an extensive interview with the director in the DVD Bonus section.

reply

Was Sandokan (renamed Thomas ~ for doubting Thomas?) taken in for HIS penance or to amp up the repentant atmosphere for the priests?

After all, he's PTSD'd to the max, drowning in a chemical stew of drugs and alcohol sure to keep him effed up, and angry enough at the whole lot that they henceforth will have to sleep with one eye open to try and protect themselves from a vengeful rape by a swarthy victim more physically powerful than they!

reply

Was Sandokan (renamed Thomas ~ for doubting Thomas?) taken in for HIS penance or to amp up the repentant atmosphere for the priests?
As I recall for both reasons.

Ever tried, ever failed?
No matter.
Try again, fail again.
Fail better.

reply

Please describe to me how you see it as for his penance. I see him getting room, board, drugs and drink, while the others, the inmates, are stripped of their dog, their wine, etc. and are now stuck with an in-their-face reminder of what they've done and the vengeance he might enact.

Great film, hey?

reply

Just wanted to say I thought this was a great film and the ending was very powerful.

reply