Written by, about and for total MORONS - Those Who Can't (2016) Discussion

[–] skipskee 8 years ago

I couldn't agree more. It's not that its a bad thing to make a show for morons though. Morons need something to watch. I had to watch one all the way through just to see if there was something good. There wasn't.

It's really pathetic to watch this actually. It's so sad. I mean these 30-something year olds on TV are trying so hard to be funny.

reply

[–] zingaZinga 7 years ago

I find that people who claim intellectually superiority, are usually dumber than the ones they're critical of.

reply

[–] Inkeater0003 8 years ago

I just watched a few episodes, I don't think it's really as bad as you're making it out.
Some people like stupid comedy, but that doesn't make them stupid..just gives away who the stoners are lol

reply

[–] thereffman 8 years ago

You just capitalized an entire word. Even morons know you don't do that. Look at you, more retarded than the people you yourself think are stupid, what a pathetic little person you are.

reply

[–] pt100 8 years ago

You just capitalized an entire word. Even morons know you don't do that.

Um, actually, ONLY morons know you don't do that. (How ironic!)

As the following Wikipedia article explains, it's perfectly acceptable as an alternative to either boldface or italics for a single word or short phrase to be in ALL CAPS, partly because it usually saves time vs. putting something in either boldface or italics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_caps

Only extended/excessive use is considered impolite, and that's been true since the beginning of the Internet.

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.–J.B. Haldane

reply

[–] thereffman 8 years ago

Kid just tried to use wikipedia to make a point. Kid can't run fast enough away from this embarrassment.

reply

[–] pt100 8 years ago

thereffman said:

Kid just tried to use wikipedia to make a point. Kid can't run fast enough away from this embarrassment.

I mention your name and quote your idiocy so it will never be expunged, even if you decide to delete your stupid post, and will remain for all to see.

Ironic once more. You are the one who should be embarrassed, but are apparently too stupid and/or ignorant to be so. Why don't you just give up and quit digging deeper the hole you're already in?

First, I'm not a kid (but I'm guessing you may be one). Second, that rule about using all caps for emphasis instead of boldface or italic has been around in traditional printed media since long before you (and the Internet and Wikipedia) were born.

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.–J.B. Haldane

reply

[–] Moon_Doggie 8 years ago

thereffman said:

Kid just tried to use wikipedia to make a point.

I guess you didn't get the memo, numb nuts. Several years ago it was proved that Wikipedia has accuracy equivalent to Encyclopedia Britannica. That's why Britannica's hardbound encyclopedia exited the consumer market.

pt100 is right: you really are pathetic.

A person's a person, no matter how small. -- Dr. Seuss

reply

[–] thereffman 8 years ago

Moon and PT embarrassed beyond reproach here, I'd hate to be their handlers. Work is definitely cut out for them having to deal with these two mental retards. God bless them, I would never imagine going through life being raised as a practical joke like their parents did to them.

reply

[–] pt100 8 years ago

i.e.: Those that Cant

Not sure what your point is with that phrase (that also lacks an apostrophe). If you're saying "that" is correct and "who" is not--which your phrasing might imply--then you are quite wrong. In fact, "who" is generally preferred to "that" when speaking of a person rather than a thing.

And your spelling and punctuation leave much to be desired, e.g.:

i mean-why bother ?

Lowercase "i" as well as a space before the "?"--and a hyphen (-) instead of either a dash (—) or double hyphen
(--) between "mean" and "why" .

It's clear that you have no cause to criticize real script writers. If your excuse for sloppy writing is that you're using some cheap smartphone, then get a real computer (and maybe an education).

Also, the show gets a 7.1 imdb.com rating (as of this writing), and an 87% audience score at Rotten Tomatoes (as of this writing), which isn't too shabby.

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.–J.B. Haldane

reply

[–] ZurichGnome 8 years ago

Also, the show gets a 7.1 imdb.com rating (as of this writing), and an 87% audience score at Rotten Tomatoes (as of this writing), which isn't too shabby.

It wasn't as good at the beginning, but it got better as the season went on. I really liked the prom episode this past April. I'll give the new season a chance.

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. - Arthur C. Clarke

reply

[–] milisefic 7 years ago

As pt100 clearly explained, it's not understood by total morons.

reply

[–] ShermThurman 7 years ago

That's funny; most of us are, without any question at all, a hell of a lot more intelligent than you. We enjoy it.

I didn't lose 10 points from my IQ watching the show, although I did reading your lame, tired ass post.

You put a "Z" on surrounds. That should tell you all you need to know.

reply

[–] politicidal 7 years ago

Apparently someone has since there's a new season. I'm surprised.

Whatever you are, be a good one.

reply