River climbs a tree, finds a rope, and is visited by the dead girl, who tells him that she hanged herself, but that her boyfriend didn't hang himself, as they had planned. He has confessed to her murder. River visits him in jail, and tells him that he will be released. How does River prove to anyone that the boyfriend is innocent?
Any help on this? I enjoyed the program, but this seems like an enormous plot hole.
I think River found two ropes, indicating that both kids were planning to kill themselves.
Still.....Is that actually enough to resolve a police investigation? It seems that the police would have to accept the testimony that River received from the dead girl.
shareI'm sure they just spaired us wievers the obvious paperwork and other formal stuff. They trusted us to get the picture anyway.
Great show!!.
River says he found her. Her body was there too, as well as the rope and her clothes.
With clear physical evidence of suicide, there's no cause to charge the young man.
I mean, why not just "Snuffcarcass"?
Clear evidence of suicide? How do you figure that? He still could have killed her. I was wondering the same thing as the original poster (even though I could barely understand what River said to the boyfriend in the interrogation room??)
shareHe still could have killed her.How?
How could you possibly prove that she hanged herself and that somebody else didn't do it?? You have absolutely nothing to support this claim.
shareAlready answered. I'm sorry you don't know what those really quite simple words mean but you can just look them up for yourself.
"Look! I'm a prostitute robot from the future!"
I can't believe some people think a murderer could force someone to climb a tree with them, inclusive of ropes. Going willingly up a tree with a rope is emphatically declarative of one intentions. Further, the web page posts and the Romeo and Juliet references leave no doubt.
Some common sense people.