This family is not Catholic, or Lutheran, or Methodist, etc. They identify as "Christian", ie. Evangelical Christian, which by its own definition is anti-Science. They are fundamentalist who belief take the Bible literally believing that the Earth is only 6000 years old (and therefore their conflict with the astronomy section). They reject Global Warming because they believe that their god would never destroy his creation. People can abuse the planet for their own wants and needs without any consequences.
Evangelical Christians can be "young earth," "old earth" or "gap theory." They do not have to believe the earth is 6000 years old. You read that somewhere in the Atheists' Handbook, or heard/read a handful of Evangelicals and assumed they spoke for all. Generalization is common with bigots.
Fundamentalist, evangelical Christians are not anti-science. There are Creationists who are also scientists -- and I once remember a secular scientist who was asked to name the one thing he wished he could prove/disprove, and it was that he wanted to be able to disprove Creationism. At least he was honest enough -- and knew enough about the subject -- to admit that he couldn't. The rest of you guys waive around fossils, yell "Aha!" and announce we're all "young earthers" so you "win."
The funniest part is that you think we believe God would never destroy His creation. "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up." (2Peter 3:10, KJV)
I hope you don't live in the Northeast -- three feet of global warming is coming your way.
And did you hear about that big Global Warming conference they had in the remote town of Davos, Switzerland. They had 1700 private jets coming in to Zurich, with helicopters flying the people to the remote town. If these people honestly believed that "carbonization of the planet" was a problem, they wouldn't have set up a conference that required people to carbonize the planet that way.
Since the "experts" aren't serious about it, I don't see why I should be.
Don't quit the day job. Your analysis of things theological only rises to the level of what one sees on the Passion of the Christ board -- more spite and prejudice than anything else. Your spelling is better, though.
You will probably disagree. That's the nature of discussions -- they have two sides.
reply
share