MovieChat Forums > The Birth of a Nation (2016) Discussion > Sadly the LBGT left out again

Sadly the LBGT left out again


When will be included in the suffering. When dam it

reply

Yeah, but then there would be b*tchers and lil crybabies moaning about that too. I hear ya though. 

--------------------------------
TZTM---The Jews don't own everything, the Arabs won't let them.

reply

That's a stupid statement. Did everyone in the movie say who their partner was? How would you know who was gay or not? Did you want them to show gay stereotypes?

reply

"LGBTIQWERTIES" have been around since mammals existed and were only suppressed after the Dark Ages -- when brain-rot religion took a hold of anything and everything it could usurp and use to control the masses; thereby stagnating homo-sapien evolution for centuries.

Non hetero-normative peoples were prominent in all major empires and were well-accepted members of society. In Ancient Greece, the "Erastes / Eremos" dynamic prescribed the adult men take prepubescent, adolescent boys under their sexual auspice until puberty was reached (i.e., what we may term "pederasty" today). In the Roman empire, transsexuals were common. In Japan, cross-dressing is a cultural norm spanning centuries...

That's to say nothing of the endless list of societies' inordinately-contributing, non hetero-normative people who have exited throughout the Ages. Even the computers we're now using to converse with -- and, indeed, will likely take out place as the apex species of this planet one day -- exist in no small part to a gay man -- Alan Turing!

In this sense -- and especially considering how lousily and outright misogynistically males have treated females over millennia -- LGBT peoples have had it pretty damn good! That is, as broached, until brain damaging religion infected the infant cock skin butchering brains of parents and then metastasised to their progeny... whereinafter everything became "a sin"... ......

reply

Respectfully,

I do not believe your statement is fair. There have been movies out for ages that zone in on suffering for the LGBTQ community, but this movie was not the place to include such a perception. At best, it would have been a small scene and still that would not have satisfied people. Now, I do believe that in another movie, there could be a focus on the double suffering that a slave could have gone through from being black and being in a socially unacceptable relationship. I'm sure some day that movie script will be written once the idea plants itself inside the appropriate writer.

reply

How is this at all about the LBGT Mr. Troll sir?

"Few people understand the psychology of dealing with a highway traffic cop."

reply