The irony here is..

I don't really see anything that's funny about it.

You asked if I was implying something I and answered that I wasn't. After misreading it you went off on minor attacks and tangents.

Sorry, it is your reading comprehension. Clearly you could have at any point in time said "Oh, I'm sorry, I may have misunderstood what you meant" without resorting to name calling and near gaslighting including the times when I pointed out that you had misinterpreted what I said.

Pathetic. You're still in denial over you completely screwing up a question a toddler could answer.

So is this what this conversation has stooped to now, because I can go back and forth all night on this if that's your wish. Or do you have anything else of value to say?

Again, you're the one who is resorting to name calling.

What has this conversation "stooped to now"? I said you seem to have misread what I said. I have clarified myself twice and despite that (and the fact that you then claimed to ignore the other points that I made in that comment by saying that you stopped reading it) you seem to do nothing more than give attacks and refuse to listen to anyone. I really feel sorry for you.

I guess I could have responded to your question :"So you're implying the enormous influx of muslim refugees isn't an "honest" problem?" with something more like "No, I'm not implying that at all." since you asked if that was what I was implying.

I would have thought that even if you did misread that comment, you would have realized the error when it was pointed out to you not once but twice.

Honestly, you are the only one name calling here and refusing to listen to what others are saying.

You keep bringing up this name calling. When was the last time I called you a name? But yet you're the one accusing me of using ad hominem comments, despite you using it as an argument.

I'm clearly trying to bring the conversation back on topic, but if you want to keep dwelling on "name calling", that's fine by me.

You keep bringing up this name calling. When was the last time I called you a name?

Directly a name? A admittedly a while, but you've been insinuating it for the past few comments:

- Pathetic. You're still in denial over you completely screwing up a question a toddler could answer. [previous comment]


- Now, I don't know if you're actually being sincere but have terrible comprehension abilities [2 previous comments back]

- But what I do know is this, that you're in no position to tell me that I'VE misread something, when it takes you two whole comments to respond to a simple question without confusing yourself. [2 previous comments back]

- You really need to hone your craft of social interaction. [4 previous comments back]

Then of course there is your first and then continued usage of "little guy" - "Look up Sharia Law little guy. It might educate you a bit. Hopefully it'll catapult you out of your echo chamber someday."

On the other hand, I haven't been attacking you. At most I've pointed out that you misread something that I wrote or misinterpreted what I said. You've been trying to put words in my mouth and have flat out refused to acknowledge it. I've really been nothing but civil even in the face of what could possibly be considered gaslighting by you (your claims that I'm the person tossing around ad hominine comments) and an onslaught of other negative attacks.

At worst, I've said I feel sorry for you and pointed out that you misread/misinterpreted something I wrote. Considering the litany of quotes from you I just posted above, there is a clear and utter difference in the tone and consitancy of the conversation between the two of us.

This is truly poetic.

Me: "When's the last time I called you a name"

You:
1:"Pathetic" - That's not name calling
2:"You're still in denial over you completely screwing up a question a toddler could answer" - Never called you a toddler here.
3:" Now, I don't know if you're actually being sincere but have terrible comprehension abilities" - Stating someones comprehension abilities is again, not name calling.
4: Again, not one name calling incident present.
5:"You really need to hone your craft of social interaction." - *sigh* Again, not name calling.
6: "Little guy" - DING DING DING. The first name I called you.

Once again, you've proved to me just how much your comprehension skills are suffering. The only name I called you was "little guy". And what was that? My third reply? This truly is a spectacle to behold. Come on, keep trying.

Again, you selectively read what I wrote in order to continue your attacks.

One has to conclude that you must have a desire to simply attack people and sew discord. Again, I feel sorry for you.

Come on, keep trying.

Bhahaha selectively read what you wrote? I read the whole thing and literally quoted you. Don't be so upset.

The fascist today are the never trumpers and the pc crowd, obviously. They are anarchist.