So please people don't judge this film while comparing it to trick R treat as it is unfair.
I don't think it's unfair to compare two movies that are so similar: both are anthology horror films centered on Halloween night and taking place in the same "universe" (as in certain characters appear in more than one segment).
I watched half of this one last night and will probably finish it tonight. The comparison to
Trick R Treat is immediate, obvious, and unavoidable. From what I've seen so far
Tales of Halloween is not the superior of the two movies, but that doesn't mean it can't be a decent entry in the genre of anthology horror. I'm liking it more than
Southbound, for example.
Trick R Treat might have had a better caliber of actors, but anthology movies live or die by the writing and the pacing of the shorts. I'd say that I'm moderately impressed with that writing in
Tales of Halloween and I think that the direction is okay. I'm still waiting (again, I'm halfway through the movie) for an image that's really haunting (like the children on the school bus in their masks from
Trick R Treat).
Obviously the conversation about this movie shouldn't begin and end with "Well, it isn't as good as
Trick R Treat." But if I found out there was a new horror anthology taking place on Halloween, one of the first things I'd want to know is how it stacked up against
Trick R Treat. I don't think that
Trick R Treat is so great that it has set the bar impossibly high for other horror anthologies.
reply
share