To the people defending the thieves.....

So get off your ass and find a good job, and work toward improving your situation rather than trying to rob a blind guy. Her situation doesn't justify robbing a dude.


Logan, buddy. It's me, Deadpool! I shot youuuuuu....

That doesn't excuse what she did. Sure, she's a sympathetic character but I don't think you can defend her actions at all.

Rocky was sick of living poor in Detroit and wanted out. She felt bad for her sister and wanted to bring her along, but that definitely wasnt her primary motivation. If it was, why would she be going to California? A smart decision would be to go somewhere boring with stable jobs and low cost of living and try to build a new life, not to go to the state with one of the highest costs of living.

If things were bad, she could have bailed if she was old enough, and called DCS to get her sister out of there. She had no justification to rob people.

"What about the girl thief? She was trying to take her little sister out of an abused home.. Hardly, a selfish reason. She may have went about it wrong and I'm not saying she is a saint. But, she had the best of intentions."

lmao ^^

That is not a good defense for that girl. I saw another post say the old man was just sitting on the money and not using it, and so the money went to a better cause (to Jane Levy and her sister).

You've got to be kidding! That does not give anyone the right to rob someone's home! Ever!!

Honestly to me she was the most evil character when money got shot she had no care in the world and went to cry to Alex to get help when he told them it was a bad idea from the beginning but she just brushes him off. she's scared till she's the old man open hi safe with all the money then she magicallyforgets that money her bf wad just murdered in front of her eyes. when they find the girl in the basement she's all for helping her but as soon as she's put in the same position she cries and lies how if he just let's her go she'll forget about everything but as soon as she is released you can tell she's disingenuous to what she previously stated. There's plenty of moments in the movie where they could escape but she's all like what about the money the money is more important. Like when they capture him in the basement she's supposedly disgusted with what he's Donne but she's like fuck that id rather have the money than get proper justice for what this man has done. She's inherently selfish and used Alex to death literally who was such a simp/ nice guy that he had so many chances to escape but always went back to try and save her. So yea at the end I was rooting for her to take the other girls spot.

I agree. There were no likeable characters here. The blind man was so blinded by his loss that he kidnaps, bounds and gags, and impregnates the girl who killed his daughter. The thieves were so blinded by greed they felt justified in robbing and terrorizing a blind man.

It was a good movie, but I had no emotional investment in any of the characters. Initially, I did with the blind man but that soon changed.

Agreed. He should've got away with killing them all.

All decent people will agree that thieving is wrong... but the punishment has to fit the crime.

Does being fired from your job befit being caught stealing a biro from work? A reprimand yes, dismissal no.

Likewise, does ending up in a morgue - after being murdered in cold blood - befit someone breaking into your home and getting their 'just desserts'? Of course not. Prison yes. Death no.

The people on this board are insane, and probably perverted, if they can't see the old man's crimes >>>>> burgling kids. I have more of a problem with the kids' stupidity than their actual crime.

"what is your major malfunction numbnuts?!!"

"Kidnapping and impregnating some young girl is worse than B&E even with a loaded weapon."

Yeah... So? That's just common sense.

However, it doesn't make their action right. They knew, indeed, that breaking into someone's house (especially in usa where anyone can have a firearm home) comes with potential risks and consequences. That's it.

Of course, his response was irrational and, even prior to that, he had done terrible thins. By the end of the day, he's the worse of the two sides.

But worse doesn't mean that their action becomes magically good.

Your logic would really flaw if put into a realife situation. Let's pretend there is a X guy (who you don't know anything about), and that the said Mr.X murdered someone in cold blood. Horrendous crime, nothing redeemable. This mysterious fella has a brand new car, one he bought with his money. And then, there's you, who randomly walk, spot the car (without even knowing who's car it is) and all you think is "this rich fuck can afford it and I can't, let's burn it". So you decide to burn the car, despite the fact that what you do is called vandalism and is highly illegal. You decide to do it anyways. Now, we can't rely on the fact that you did the right thing and punished a murderer because as you had seen it was pure hateful and envious crime. You were not aware of the guy's background so the idea of doing good wasn't even in your deepest mind.

So now... Is your crime right because the X person (whose's personal property had been destroyed by you because of your anger issues) coincidentally happened to be a murderer?

If you say that "yes" it would justify your crime, then you're an idiot who's not ready for the real world.

"Please don't breed."

You can follow that advice as well. With a few lines you stroke me as a bitter dumbass.