I'll give her that...they could have made it a HUGE political thing but she didn't flap her trap and let the movie run by its own merit instead of pounding her chest about the almost all female cast, and it ended up being a really great movie.
shareFunny thing about Gal Gadot is people gave her a hard time when she was first cast. Then after BvS came out they realized she was a fit for the part. It doesn't matter what she says at that point because after BvS everyone had already accepted her as WW. You don't even know what Gal Gadot thinks and you have no idea what she has said in her native tongue.
You make it sound like Brie Larson is the first SJW in the MCU but you fail to realize Chris Evans beat her to it by nearly a decade. He gets more praises for being a real-life Captain America than he does criticism. It took a certain combination for the anti-feminists to hop on this bandwagon. They needed her to be an SJW. They needed her to star as a female superhero. And they needed her to not be as pretty. In fact Brie Larson probably did herself a favor by being political as it took so many eyes off her face and body that she'd been dealing with for a year and a half. Good on you Brie.
I was actually never against the casting of Gal Gadot. She was the last person I would've cast as Wonder Woman (that's part of the reason I would be god awful at being a casting director), but I was never against her being cast. To me, it was just an interesting and out of nowhere casting choice. But I was willing to give her a chance from the start.
My initial reaction was "huh, that's an interesting casting choice, would've never picked her, but I'll give her a chance. I liked Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman and I believed they were on to something with Heath Ledger as Joker. So maybe they know what they are doing casting the one actress from the Fast & Furious movies as Wonder Woman."
I also didn't need Wonder Woman to be curvy in the T & A department either, so that further explained why I was okay with Gal Gadot. And I'm a guy that doesn't really care about boob size. As long as they are real, I'm fine with whatever size they are. Plus I figured she'd put on some muscle weight for the role like most actors/actresses do for an action movie/superhero role.
I am also a HUGE fan of the Fast & Furious movies, so it was going to be nice/interesting seeing someone from those movies take on a role like Wonder Woman, and be a little more well known to moviegoers once they see her in the role. And in the end, I'm glad I was one of the few that gave her a chance. She was pretty good as Wonder Woman, and it would be hard to picture anyone else in the role, although I'm sure someone could do better. Plus she can't always be Wonder Woman. I guess for this take on Wonder Woman she was the right choice. She was surprisingly my favorite part of the Justice League movie. I originally wanted to see the movie for return of Superman, Batman (favorite superhero), and being introduced to Aquaman. But after thinking about it, Wonder Woman had the best moments in the movie. Maybe it's because a few months before Justice League, I got a whole movie focused on Wonder Woman.
What the hell is wrong with her face and body? They look more than fine to me.
shareLess than a decade ago, in fact a mere five years ago, your oh-so-woke SJW male crush got into hot water over the following: https://www.themarysue.com/grossvengers-age-of-dolton/
I'd suggest that the frat boy behind such 'classics' as Not Another Teen Movie, The Perfect Score, and the 00s Fantastic Four films is not quite as woke as you like to believe, and that his recent conversion to the progressive agenda is a case of him letting the Captain America role go to his head.
Like a lot of supposedly progressive male stars who affect a heroic persona, one only needs to do a basic search of their background to see that they're not nearly the heroes they like us to believe they are.
Then again, look at the way some people still talk so poetically about serial sex offenders and racists, John F Kennedy and Bill Clinton. They still like to believe that they're white male 'liberal' heroes are the real deal. How naive.
Oh well, like Malcolm X said about JFK, the chickens are coming home to roost.
I agree none of them are heroes. I wasn't calling anyone a hero. But it doesn't change the fact that Brie Larson isn't the first SJW to be in the MCU. She's just the first woman SJW with her own movie. A big part of Brie Derangement Syndrome was the trailer had the audacity of accentuating the "her" in "a hero."
I wouldn't call JFK or Bill Clinton a racist but LBJ was kinda known to be. Bill Clinton wasn't considered a hero though. The Lewinsky thing was so devastating that he refrained from campaigning for Al Gore.
Can we stop using the term 'SJW'?
I know I used it, but I was parroting you (and admittedly, you were parroting the OP, but maybe that's a failing on both our part).
It's such a reductive, patronising, and often provocative term.
I do agree that some of the misogyny being directed at Captain Marvel existed way before Larson's recent, and most 'controversial' interviews. The film was always going to be attacked for featuring a female protagonist, by certain mouth-breathing types (although I also think that Disney, like many big corporations, has a tendency to pat itself on the back for doing the bare minimum in terms of diversity, and the 'HERo' thing was part of its self-congratulatory discovery of feminism). Still, I also think Larson could ideally have expressed herself better in some of her interviews. She's certainly right to say that the media, and film criticism in particular, needs more racial and gender diversity, but she could have done it in a way which didn't read as if she was saying the opinions of white men don't count (see her statement regarding A Wrinkle in Time).
As for LBJ, you're right, he was known to be a bigger racist in private than either JFK or Clinton, but his legacy goes to show how complex and paradoxical politics can be, since he did far more to further the rights of POC than pretty much any President, Democratic or Republican, of the last hundred years.
Disney has been improving their Princesses and their "message" to girls for a long time. There is nothing newly feminist about it. The earliest off the top of my head is The Princess and the Frog in 2009.... Then Tangled the next year.
shareAgreed.
shareI like The Princess and the Frog, because you had the strong, intelligent black woman turned princess, but you also had the dumb blonde rich best friend. These days I doubt you'd be able to get away with the latter. You'd have the strong, intelligent hero and the strong, intelligent best friend fighting against the strong, intelligent villain.
shareWell, a fight between strong, intelligent people is more interesting than clumsy oafs who are victorious despite their ineptitude (Jar Jar Binks!), or moustache-twirling one- dimensional caricatures that are more like talking background scenery than people (Emperor Palpatine).
It felt quite natural to refer to Star Wars examples.
What are you talking about? Emperor Palpatine is one of the best villains ever. He is so deliciously evil, and yet during his initial incarnation as a seemingly gracious and servile senator, he seems like such a credibly trustworthy figure (even if we, as the audience, know he's going to reveal himself to be a villain).
Still, I do agree with you that a smart hero and a smart villain are more compelling than morons, but it depends on the genre. Foolish and idiotic characters can add some comic relief and levity.
Oh don't get me wrong, I do like the Emperor, he's just not much in the way of a real human... being twisted by the Dark Side of the Force will do that to a person.
He's mostly just a foil for Vader's redemption, of course... But yes, Star Wars thrives on stereotypes and caricatures and such.
Thank you! somebody needed to say this other than me! Now all of these WJWs never give a rip if folks are sick of their Bull! I hated Wonder Woman because it was so full of WJW and WIMP nonsense! That drove me to Marvel in the first place! if WJWs get to speak out, Why the Heck are we letting these folks silence us!?
share[deleted]
I've been asking myself the same question. I have no idea what WJW stands for... "Women's Justice Warrior"?
I've noticed the last few weeks it's become a thing now.
SJW and "snowflake" were clever at one time, but as people tend to do, they ruined it, and now the terms are so overused they don't even have meaning anymore.
White Justice Warriors! My favorite is WIMP White Indignant Male Person! And the second is Blimp
Black IndignantMale Person! But as a Black woman, I am quick to use the phrase Black Lying Impotent MalePerson! Sounds nicer than HN.
Oh, white justice warrior. Lol.
Ok. Thank you for letting me know. That was driving me nuts.
Brie was pretty outspoken about her views years before she was ever cast in the MCU. It's really no surprise. They knew who they were hiring.
I've heard rumors Gal has typical Israeli views toward America just like Natalie Portman, but i've never seen her run her yapper about it so who cares.
Natalie Portman has recently criticised Israel's nation state law and snubbed a Genesis Award ceremony in order to make a political stand against the current Israel government.
shareNatalie Portman sounds like an SJW. Of course none of them come close to the social justice champion Martin Luther King Jr. Interestingly everyone who complains about SJWs feels similar about them today that MLK's opponents felt about him. Very telling.
shareThis is true! And they hated Chadwick Boseman! If Brie is half the fighter that she is, God Bless her!
shareMLK wasn't a multi-millionaire celebrity. He was a relatively humble (and, heaven forbid, a God-fearing) man.
That said, if it wasn't already clear, I do have a lot of respect for Natalie Portman's stance on most political issues. Unlike many other celebs, she does strike me as someone who does know what she's talking about, and who does take an intelligent, sophisticated and nuanced stance on most issues (i.e. she is, quite rightly, a big critic of the current Israeli administration, but she does not support the BDS movement against Israel which she, quite understandably, feels unfairly targets all Israelis, even those who are sympathetic to the Palestinian cause).
An SJW doesn't need to be a celebrity. Far from it. And MLK quickly rose to the status of celebrity. An SJW is someone who speaks openly and publicly about a personal cause or agenda they feel needs more support than it currently has. Thats really all there is to it. MLK was an SJW that was so resonating that he was killed for it. Granted the hate against Brie isn't nearly as strong but thats because she is of the most lukewarm SJW variety that doesn't mean anything. The same goes for Natalie Portman. But the real problem is we live in the internet age where we are constantly bombarding ourselves with stuff we like to complain about. The reality is you are doing it to yourself. If you are frustrated this badly by it then you should consider unplugging.
I still find it weird how you kept agreeing with that racist Kingswood troll post after post yet you always pop up with a contrary opinion to something I wrote. You claim to be a leftist. You claim to be a Bernie supporter. No leftist Bernie supporter would give a pass to a poster who said Obama's administration and wife were all token wookies and then turn around and agree with him post after post about how problematic the left are. So either you're just pretending to be a leftist to agree with Trumpers and argue with leftists or you seriously need to unplug from the internet. My guess is the latter.
I'm not attacking you. I thought the stuff I posted about Natalie Portman would have been quite agreeable to you. My only bone of contention with you on this particular thread revolved around Chris Evans.
I don't know where and what I agreed with Kingswood over, but if he's been calling Barack and Michelle Obama 'wookies', suffice to say I think that is disgusting language.
Still, just because I hate Trump and the alt-right, it doesn't mean I have to be blindly partisan and give my own side a break. This is an anonymous board where none of us have any power or impact, and to be fair, that's as it should be. It's just a place for us to express ourselves.
So, I do not feel beholden to represent the left in any way, other than to be polite, and to eschew any form of racism, sexism, and general bigotry in my own posts. But by reaching out and speaking to right-wingers and finding common ground, I maybe able to build bridges and find a way of softening their stance, because the truth is, these people are not going to disappear, and so the best we can hope for is that they change or at least moderate their stance.
"just like Natalie Portman, but i've never seen her run her yapper about it so who cares."
Nitpick/GrammarNazi alert! She would yammer about it, but we do yammer from our yapper.
=)
I recently heard her attach Israel! That makes her cool in my book! Then she congratulated Brie Larsen! That gave her another point! What I don’t get is why Folks get mad when Isay I can’t stand James Wood! Ya’ll still act like Men shouldn’t be told to shut their yappers!
shareof course not... she is not the typical hollywood libcunt like these american women.
Their hate for the president have infested their pea size brains.
They should move to africa or the middle east... get some perspective of how women are treated.
Yeeha: move to Kenya, Where women kicked men out of their villages! Maybe to Pakistan when Taliban members were beaten by! There is Ghana, There White preachers were deported for trying to put Dahomey women in their place! Syria, where an all woman army took out ISIS!
These conservacucks from Kansas, need to get out a little more! Exercise that microbe they brains
Kenya, the center of fgm ...
Pakistan, the center of honor killings and where women are 20% of the workforce.
ISIS is still in Syria, and not going anywhere too soon.
Women could not drive in SA.
With few positive examples you cannot contradict the general discrimination in that area. Fact is: women in USA are way less discriminated against than in ME or Africa.
Wrong! Kenya is not the center of Fgm! That would be Ghana! It’s banned in Kenya!
shareBanned but ~40% of the women over 35years are mutilated. Banned but it’s still done on large scale, ~20% of the women around 20 years old are mutilated.
So, no, i’m Not wrong.
And Ghana? Was that supposed to help your case? Take a map and check wher Ghana is ...
Not in Kenya! In fact, I bet you know the penalty for a woman caught practicing fgm: same as it was thirty years ago! Stick to facts son! Not Shockley! PS Boko Haram was caught in Ghana! Extradited to Nigeria! ...
shareAgree,
stick to facts.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/01/18/kenya-female-genital-mutilation/1041960001/
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2018/06/19/how-outlawing-female-genital-mutilation-in-kenya-has-driven-it-underground-and-led-to-its-medicalization/
Plus it was banned just few years ago.
But that's beside the point. The point is that yeah, Africa is not quite the best continent for women like you are trying to imply with your examples.
So please follow your advice and stick to facts: women are way worse treated in ME and Africa than in USA.
I am sticking to the facts! Not the Shockley you made up!https://reason.com/volokh/2018/11/20/federal-female-genital-mutilation-ban-ex Brookings is really fake on this one! The place it is legal in is the US!
https://www.africanimpact.com/need-know-female-genital-mutilation/ Like I said, it is basically illegal in Africa!
A lot of things are illegal in a lot of places. People still do them.
Did you even read that article you posted? Did you see that graphic with the percentages?
98% of the females in Somalia are mutilated. Do you even know how to read? That article that you posted is an argument against all you stated so far.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-africa-fgm-lawmaking-factbox/factbox-female-genital-mutilation-around-the-world-a-fine-jail-or-no-crime-idUSKCN1LT2OS
As usual you are ignorant. Not all countries in Africa (which is not a single country, did you know that?) have laws against fgm.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-africa-fgm-lawmaking-factbox/factbox-female-genital-mutilation-around-the-world-a-fine-jail-or-no-crime-idUSKCN1LT2OS
"Chad, Liberia, Mali, Sierra Leone, Somalia and Sudan, which are home to 16 million girls, have no law, meaning FGM is still effectively legal."
Also in the United States! The difference is: you can go to jail if you are caught doing it in Africa! In America, it is illegal to prosecute a person who does it! https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/20/us/female-genital-mutilation-case-charges-dropped/index.html Now what were you saying?
sharehttps://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2019-01-22-nineteen-arrested-in-uganda-fgm-raid/ It is obviously Not legal!: except in the US
shareLady, do you know the difference between a continent and a country? Uganda is a country. Africa is a continent. There are countries on the African continent in which fgm is legal. So, no, fgm is not illegal in Africa. It is illegal in parts of Africa.
Plus: if it's illegal in Somalia explain the 98% of women with fgm. It's illegal but still it's done by everyone.
I don't care if it's legal or not, fact is: women are forced to go through the procedure.
Africa is a continent In that continent, anyone who mutilates a female goes to jail! a
America is a country! It is legal to mutilate the genitalia of your daughters for religious reasons! Read the damn articles stupid!
you are such a Moron.
I read the articles you imbecile.
Chad is in Africa? In Chad fgm is not illegal so you can do it and not go to jail. Yes, in Africa you imbecile.
And who does it in America? Look in that article and see who's doing it. But we were not talking about america here. We are talking about Africa. In which although in some countries is illegal still in those countries 98% are mutilated.
You know what else is illegal: driving while drunk. Did that ever stopped people from doing it? Guess what: NOT.
You know what is illegal? To cross the borders without proper documents. Do you know how many undocumented immigrants are in US?
So, yeah, being illegal or not is not that important. Important is that it is done. On a large scale. In Africa.
And i stop here as well, you're too stupid to understand basic things.
She's a shill and a troll. 83 comments on one film from an account made to promote this movie.
shareAgreed, gal is charming and funny. She made people love WW before they even saw the movie. I'm sure Marvel thought they were attaching themselves to a progressive movement by hiring Larson, but she has negatively influenced my desire to see this. I guarantee if this wasn't so heavily attached to Infinity, it would not perform as well as they hoped.
shareI beg to differ! This movie is doing well because folks have made women angry! I know this so called boycott has me buying tickets! Even Forbes is noticing the uptick! Maybe the trolls should have rethought this! Unlike me, they don't post: they vote with their dollars! That's what happened with Black Panther! https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/black-panther-is-a-triumph-in-a-year-of-triumphs-for-people-of-color/2018/02/16/080aaf24-1359-11e8-9065-e55346f6de81_story.html?utm_term=.e577826d05d8
shareNeither charming nor funny! She was downright depressing! I couldn't watch Wonder Woman! I would rather have Lynda Carter in that role! no Barbie doll can play this part!
shareOh, but a barbie doll can play cpt marvel? :D
shareApparently she was NOT a Barbie Doll was she! She opened her mouth and spoke up! Nothing Barbie Doll about that!
shareRead the definition of a Barbie doll. Keeping its mouth shut is not a trait.barbie doll.
Barbie doll is by definition blonde (gal gaddot is not), has blue eyes (unlike gal) and represents the American “beauty” plus void of emotions, again not gal. Rather Mary Sue marvel fits the bill.
You might keep your definition of Barbie doll to yourself! Ask me my version! You kids need to stop redefining words for grownups! Barbie Doll will always have the “ Stepford definition!
And Mary and Mark Sue will still have the same definition it had when I was your age! Mary Sue will still mean “ Anti Feminist House Character” And you know what Mark Sue means! You probably are one!
And what is the "Stepford definition"? Link?
As for mary sue definition:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sue
"The term "Mary Sue" comes from the name of a character created by Paula Smith in 1973 for her parody story "A Trekkie's Tale"[2]:15 published in her fanzine Menagerie #2.[3] The story starred Lieutenant Mary Sue ("the youngest Lieutenant in the fleet — only fifteen and a half years old"), and satirized unrealistic characters in Star Trek fan fiction"
Or per google:
"Mar·y Sue
noun
(originally in fan fiction) a type of female character who is depicted as unrealistically lacking in flaws or weaknesses."
You lack knowledge and you are quite ignorant I would say. Or just a leftist eager to redefine the usual terms in a way to suit HER view of the world. And have the nerve to talk about facts.
There is no Mark Sue :P
Wikipedia has that wrong! And you know this! Stepford Wife Or Stepford attitude! “ Female Anti Feminist Bullshit easily disproven! I knew plenty of Stepford Actresses ! I refused to deal with WJW Chauvinistic Bullshit! You children need to stop trying to make our language your Own! Get your own language!
shareHaha, everyone got it wrong but you.
It's not just wikipedia - which i know it's not wrong. It's google. It's urban dictionary. It's everyone BUT you.
No, it's not me who changes the language, but crazy extreme leftists ;)
And btw, it's not your language. English is language of european origins, don't act like it's yours.
Mary sue is a very well known trope and you have the source of the expression. If you have another source present it. But you don't.
Stop being ignorant and educate yourself. The world is not as you want it to be just because you want it to be like that ;)
Where else? I thought so! Educate yourself! Get a NS magazine or a Fan Fiction Page! We all can’t be wrong!
shareNo! https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MarySue !
shareGee lady, do you even know how to read?
The article you just posted just enforces what i said. Damn :D
Let me quote from the article you linked, since it might be too much for you to read a whole page ...
"Mary Sue as Infallible Character
Related to the above, this is when the idea is that Mary Sue is a character that simply never fails."
No! It doesn’t are you functionally illiterate! Your Mary Sue is hated by Chaivinistd! The Mary Sue I speak of, If you read the article is a Character made up by men! Read the whole damn thing moron!https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MarySue
shareGeee, you are so stupid that you cannot even read what is written on that page you posted
Let me help you.
"The name "Mary Sue" comes from the 1974 Star Trek fanfic A Trekkie's Tale. "
Which was written not by a man but by a woman, Paula Smith. So NO, it's not made by "men".
https://fanlore.org/wiki/Paula_Smith
You are so stupid that you contradict any fact, any written fact just to prove an ignorant point.
Again, i'm quoting from YOUR link. Moron.
And i end here because you are denying basic facts.
Ok moron: I cut and pasted the information you need to read!
TV Tropes doesn't get to set what the term means; the best we can do is capture the way it is used. Since there's no consensus on a precise definition, the best way to describe the phenomenon is by example of the kind of character pretty much everyone could agree to be a Mary Sue. These traits usually reference the character's perceived importance in the story, their physical design and an irrelevantly over-skilled or over-idealized nature.
The name "Mary Sue" comes from the 1974 Star Trek fanfic A Trekkie's Tale. Originally written as a parody of the standard Self-Insert Fic of the time (as opposed to any particular traits), the name was quickly adopted by the Star Trek fanfiction community. Its original meaning mostly held that it was an Always Female Author Avatar, regardless of character role or perceived quality. Often, the characters would get in a relationship with either Kirk or Spock, turn out to have a familial bond with a crew member, be a Half-Human Hybrid masquerading as a human, and die in a graceful, beautiful way to reinforce that the character was Too Good for This Sinful Earth. (Or space, as the case may be.)
Even back then, there wasn't a total consensus on what was or wasn't Mary Sue, since it's not always immediately obvious which character is an Author Avatar. As this essay reveals, suspiciously Mary Sue-like characters were noted in subscriber-submitted articles for 19th-century childrens' magazines, making this trope Older Than You Think.
The prototypical Mary Sue is an original female character in a fanfic who obviously serves as an idealized version of the author mainly for the purpose of Wish Fulfillment. She's exotically beautiful, often having an unusual hair or eye color, and has a similarly cool and exotic name. She's exceptionally talented in an implausibly wide variety of areas, and may possess skills that are rare or nonexistent in the canon setting.
Moroooooon, do you even bother to read what you post?
I quote from what YOU quoted, imbecile.
"The name "Mary Sue" comes from the 1974 Star Trek fanfic A Trekkie's Tale. Originally written as a parody of the standard Self-Insert Fic of the time (as opposed to any particular traits)"
That was written by a woman, imbecile. WOOOOOOMAN. So, no, again, it's not "made by men".
And read what they say in the first proposition that you quoted: "TV Tropes doesn't get to set what the term means; the best we can do is capture the way it is used."
And the ending of what you quoted: "The prototypical Mary Sue is an original female character in a fanfic who obviously serves as an idealized version of the author mainly for the purpose of Wish Fulfillment. She's exotically beautiful, often having an unusual hair or eye color, and has a similarly cool and exotic name. She's exceptionally talented in an implausibly wide variety of areas, and may possess skills that are rare or nonexistent in the canon setting."
Exactly what i said: Mary Sue Marvel, exceptionally talented and without any flaws or weakness.
Are you that fucking stupid that you don't even understand what you read??? And you even quote it ... geeee
And it is obvious that you refuse to read the article Moron! If you had, you would know that your Mary Sue is Bogus you Iiiiiiddddddddiiiiiiiooooooottttttttt
shareI read the article. And it actually approves what i was saying, although making the term a bit more broad but with the same general meaning.
But as it has been seen in this thread you don't understand what you read. Even what you quoted actually supported my version and was against your version.
Nowhere in that article it's said that was a term made by anti feminist men. You fail. Again.
I presented you facts. Facts that you cannot accept. Like a true extreme leftist :D
No! It doesNot! But like a True rightist, you insist it does! What part of Trek Era and Wiki do you NOT understand! Like most rightists: You tried to redefine shit!
shareWrong, i'm not a conservative. I'm a moderate leftist. And it pains me to see how stupid the extreme left is.
What part of wiki? The one that you said that "wiki is wrong about it"?
Trek Era? Of course it's from the Trek era since it's a fan-fiction that mocks Star Trek. Written by a WOMAN. Why can't you understand that it was written by a woman and not "by men"?
I said that so many times (i sent you both to wiki, which you said is wrong) and to the fanzine.
Wtf.
No, you did not read the article! The first part questions which Mary Sue Trope is Right! And then they describe the Marty Sue............... Read the fuckung article or STFU!
shareoh, what? Marty Sue?
i was under the impression that you said Mark Sue :D
Proves again how ignorant you are.
and yeah, Marty Sue is just the corresponding male trope. Nothing more.
And neither part states that your version of the trope is right or even mentioned it, so why did you even posted it?
And you are a Conservative! Stop this lying! You are giving me a headache! When will you wing nuts stop pretending to be something you are not! Just stay in your little group! “ moderate leftist “ indeed
shareYeah, there is this group, called moderate left. And we hate the conservatives and the extreme leftists, like you.
I'm for universal health care and "free" education, equality, bla bla. Among other things. Those are pretty much left ideas i would say. Do you think that those are conservative ideas?
No, there is not! What there is is a bunch of conservatives who want to trigger folks by pretending to be leftists! My Constitutional Law professor swears they do this to upset the real leftists! You would call it “triggering “us! He just reminded us that most “ Moderates just want to sell their far right argument with half truth logic! The moment you don’t buy the half truth, they reveal their true colors! You have already revealed yours!
shareThere is no right wing argument here. But you are too stupid or too indoctrinated to see/understand it.
I’ve seen it before.
Typical Right wing prattling! In all my fifty eight years, I have yet to see one of your idiots, ever admit that you are just plain HARDHEADED!
shareSo anyone who doesn't agree with you on your stupid bullshit is right wing?
Omg you are such an imbecile.
So, anybody who disagrees with you is an imbecile! what a moron you must be! And what an old argument! Well, I guess stupidity is better than actually listening in your world
shareNo, you are an imbecile, period.
Not because you disagree with me but because you disagree with facts and twist them in order to justify your stupid extreme ideology.
"What there is is a bunch of conservatives who want to trigger folks by pretending to be leftists! My Constitutional Law professor swears they do this to upset the real leftists! "
Your prof is a postmodern conspiracy nutcase! It's contagious.
Yup! That’s what you do! You just don’t want to be caught doing it! Stop actin so innocent! You have been doing this since Nixon!
You are proof that being fake is not only wrong: it’s stupid!
At least Brie was not a WJW like Gal! She spoke up! She was heard! And she didn't care what these WJWs thought about it! That is why Captain Marvel will be getting my money! It will be a long time before I give DC a damn penny!
shareAt Least Brie was not a WJW turd! She opened her mouth and ignored the WIMPs flapping their traps,! As for Wonder Woman, it was horrible!
shareWhite???
shareGal Gadot is also the most beautiful woman in the world. Brie is nothing.
share