MovieChat Forums > Saving Christmas (2014) Discussion > I'm withdrawing my support for this film...

I'm withdrawing my support for this film over LU's endorsement of Trump


Since Liberty University (LU) was one of the main producers of this film, and since LU has subsequently endorsed the pro-'abortion' (a.k.a. pro-baby-murdering) candidate named donald Trump, LU has retroactively corrupted this film with its evil.

Therefore, I am compelled now to renounce both LU and this film as evil.

However, I will still support Mr. Cameron since he didn't know that LU was evil at the time when he agreed to appear in this film.

Having said that, if Mr. Cameron continues to support LU going forward, even after LU endorsed the evil man Trump, then at that point I will regretfully have to withdraw my support for Mr. Cameron as well.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

Psycho.

reply

I withdrew my support for this film over how bad it is. I was excited to see Kirk Cameron's new project and then I saw.... This.

reply

You realize there were already only three potential, and only 2 realistic, candidates to support at the time you complained about LU don't you?

There is a real complex situation for institutions or individuals in a leadership capacity as far as this Presidential Election is concerned. Sitting it out is allowing the two awful possibilities to be entirely selected by folks without any influence of faith. Christians who look to LU as one of their sources of guidance should not be left with a suggestion to just sit out this election.

Perhaps you want LU to endorse Clinton?

Despite the choice being a matter of which is the least bad choice it is important to choose one option. It's easy to sit back and criticize so if you're in a position of leadership which candidate would you "support"?

reply

You realize there were already only three potential, and only 2 realistic, candidates to support at the time you complained about LU don't you?


Sure, but that doesn't mean one should endorse an evil candidate just because the "potential" ones are all evil.

Perhaps you want LU to endorse Clinton?
... it is important to choose one option
...if you're in a position of leadership which candidate would you "support"?


No, I would not choose hillary, "she" (I consider hillary to be a monster rather than a human and/or woman) is equally as evil and every bit as much in favor of murdering babies as is Trump. They are both 100% the epitome of evil and spawns of Satan. When faced with the choice between "Baby Murderer A" or "Baby Murderer B," the only good & godly choice is to reject that premise and never choose either of them. To support either of them is to support Satan and to support the 'abortion' holocaust.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

the pro-'abortion'


There is actually no such thing as "pro-abortion". I think that may be part of the problem. There is "pro-choice" meaning people can decide for themselves, but no one is pro-abortion.

For example: My g/f and I are "pro-choice", but we would use our "choice" to NOT get an abortion.

Hope this cleared it up for you and that you stop saying dumb things! 

reply

There is actually no such thing as "pro-abortion". I think that may be part of the problem. There is "pro-choice" meaning people can decide for themselves, but no one is pro-abortion.

For example: My g/f and I are "pro-choice", but we would use our "choice" to NOT get an abortion.

Hope this cleared it up for you and that you stop saying dumb things!


I'm sure Navaros (the OP) understands that. However, by his definition, you are a murderer bc you approve/allow other people to have an abortion.

According to my definition, Navaros (the OP) is pro-murder and pro-rapist and pro-mysoginist (if he is male). Because if a pregnant woman’s life is in danger like it happened in Ireland and the doctors refused to help her by doing an abortion, the woman and the fetus died. ====== Navaros is therefore a pro-murder according to me.

If a woman is raped and gets pregnant, Navaros thinks the woman should have the kid as a reminder of her rape. ========= Navaros is therefore a pro-rapist according to me.

Navaros is pro-mysoginist because he wants to take away the rights of women.

reply

the fetus


There is no such thing as "fetus." That is just one of baby murderers' many euphemisms which they use to dehumanize babies in order to pretend that their barbaric acts of brutally murdering babies are not murders even though they clearly are.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

There is no such thing as "fetus."


I disagree.
There are sperm cells, eggs cells, zygote, fetus, baby.

I would say everyone is ok with destroying sperm cells, egg cells, zygotes, but the line between the fetus stage and baby is blurry.

That is just one of baby murderers'


You believe in the jewish god and all the murders this guy did, so you don't have any morals.

reply

There is "pro-choice" meaning people can decide for themselves, but no one is pro-abortion.


Being in favor of allowing people to "decide for themselves" to murder their babies is still pro-'abortion' and hence pro-murder. Nothing could possibly be more sick.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

What makes you think Jerry's views reflect that of the campus and its students? If you had done your research you would find out that Trump didn't even receive the largest number of votes. Not even the second largest. Or the third. In fact, Trump came in fourth in the preliminaries and your comment, making your comment extremely ignorant. Are you Joshua Feuerstein? Do you believe the spirit of God left the campus the moment Bernie Sanders stepped on it?

reply

What makes you think Jerry's views reflect that of the campus and its students?


Well, if the students don't agree, then why are they not protesting their Prez's endorsement of baby-murdering-advocate Trump? Why are they not demanding that their evil Prez be fired? Why are they not issuing public statements which renounce their Prez's evil endorsement of Trump?

Are you Joshua Feuerstein?


Nope, I'm not him and I've never heard of him.

EDIT: I decided to look him up after seeing you mention him. After glancing at a couple of articles about him, he seems he might be a good guy. But I will have to learn about him more before I can be sure if he is promoting a sound gospel or not. If he is a true Bible-believing Christian who promotes a sound gospel though, then I will be becoming a fan of his. Thanks for bringing him to my attention.

Do you believe the spirit of God left the campus the moment Bernie Sanders stepped on it?


I wasn't aware of that, but does Bernie not also support the 'abortion' holocaust like all of his democrat peers? If he does, then he had/has no place on an allegedly-Christian campus. And Bernie endorsed hillary, which proves that he is an enabler of the 'abortion' holocaust even if he is not a direct supporter of it. But chances are he is a direct supporter of it too, and hence is inherently evil and antithetical to everything God stands for.

EDIT: I just looked up bernie's speech at LU.

He said:

I believe in a woman's rights....

And the right of a woman to control her own body.


Translation of what that euphemism really means: "I believe that psychopaths who want to murder their own babies while they are still in the womb should be allowed to do so and to get away scot-free with committing those murders."

What a sicko. LU is an abomination for inviting him and for giving him a venue to promote his pro-'abortion' holocaust views. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Now I know that LU was evil long before the Trump endorsement happened.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" – Gilman

reply

You are really ignorant, you know that? Lol

reply