why so many low ratings?

[deleted]

Just because it has low ratings doesn't mean that people are homophobic. Just like if you give barbershop 2 a low ratting, it doesn't mean your a racist. I gave it a 6 instead of a 5 only because I was being generous because I liked the premise.

The film's premise and the talking head segments are great, but then the director goes totally off-topic and drops the interview segments. He bogs down the second half of the film whining about his own voice. He goes to a vocal coach to try to sound less "gay" and more manly, and he is so insufferably self-loathing about his gayness that by the end of the film you just want to slap him. A total waste of time.

And, yes, I'm gay, and I'm one of the low raters. I gave it a 2.

I do like the rainbow tongue box art, though.

Maybe you give them 1 ratings because you're a twit...

well it would be kind of hypocritical of you to criticise homophobes for doing the same thing now, wouldn't it? Also, Christianity and homophobia are not the same thing.

And that's all I have to say about that.

[deleted]

Is it worth a one though? Currently it's the most common rating on this documentary.

You also can't deny that most people in the U.S. (myself included) associate that nasal cadence with being gay. That association also has little to do with the pitch of the voice. For example when I hear Gabriel Iglesias' voice, I think cartoon character, not gay.

I really don't see this movie as a cash grab. It reminds of the documentary "My Penis and I". Both about self-concious men who are toying with the idea of changing a part of themselves they dislike.