MovieChat Forums > The Monster (2016) Discussion > What was the point of this movie?

What was the point of this movie?


It was like the director saw Jurassic Park one day, and during the T-REX attack scene he was like, "Yes! Let's do that, but and hour and a half longer, and with a much smaller and less scary creature! But before all that happens, lets have some family drama with characters so terrible that you'll have no choice but to forget them"...

Why did we need family drama in a monster movie in the first place? And especially family drama with a absolutely awful and unlikable character, even after her "sacrifice". I wanted the mother to die the entire movie. Why write a character like that and then expect that audience to like her?

I think the reason they added the family drama stuff is because they didnt have enough story to fill a feature runtime.

The plot was a monster that's chasing them through the woods... and they kill it. That's the movie. No explanation of what the monster is, no interesting twist of why it was hunting them, or at least even an interesting way that they kill it. They just did the typical thing, burn it like the Thing and Aliens. They even stole "COME ON!" from aliens when ripley is shooting the queen with fire.

And why were there no other cars on the road? And why were there streetlights on a street if it wasnt near a town of some sort? They dont just put street lights in the middle of nowhere. So why did it take so long for an ambulance to show up!?

3 million dollars spent on what might have well been a syfy original with slightly better cinematography? Even the creature wasnt that cool. It looked like the things from Feast.

3/10



reply

Relationships are complicated. The monster was hunting them because it was hungry. It's origin wouldn't have fit in this movie, nor was it in anyway necessary.

Plot twists in horror movies have been a cancer on the genre, the fact they didn't have one here was a good thing. Your complaints about streetlights, EMS response, etc are things that occur often in the horror genre. It's part of the suspension of disbelief commonly required by thrillers and horror movies. You can accept the existence of a cryptid, but you have a problem with the lighting of a street? Really?

The point was their relationship, the depth of the love between two people who externally seem to lack such a bond, and how such a relationship works under the extraordinary circumstances.

This was an homage to classic horror. It was a throwback to a time when a monster didn't require an exhaustive origin story or an asinine twist derived from a focus group. It's a movie that doesn't think it necessary for dialogue establishing the monster is motivated by its hunger. Instead it embraces the idea that the less you know the better, the less you see the better. The more you know about something, the less likely you are to fear it. I am sorry you didn't like the film, but many of your complaints could be leveled against most horror movies, both the great and the bad. Maybe a different genre would better satisfy your cinematic preferences.

reply

Plot twists in horror movies have been a cancer on the genre, the fact they didn't have one here was a good thing. Your complaints about streetlights, EMS response, etc are things that occur often in the horror genre. It's part of the suspension of disbelief commonly required by thrillers and horror movies. You can accept the existence of a cryptid, but you have a problem with the lighting of a street? Really?
You make an idiotic point. Yes we can believe in a creature that we have no proof doesn't exist or isn't possible, but we can have a problem with things that we're intimately familiar with that a movie presents unrealistically. Use your brain, because I'm tired of hearing your mindset.

My Crime Is Prohibited Thought, My Oppressors Are Bleeding Heart Liberals

reply

[deleted]

Without even reading your post, the point is simy to provide entertainment to the masses and money to the studio.

Why does everyone expect a moral to every story, it's ok to just be mindlessly entertained by things.

The job this movie did at that can be debated.

reply