MovieChat Forums > Lamb (2016) Discussion > is that all seriously

is that all seriously


Okay i enjoyed the movie immensely. Very subtle but he could have made it a little more believable and still be within the law. It was a whole lot of dialog nothing more. I would have added a few more scenes maybe slightly more risque but would have hit home more... i felt let down

reply

6/10. Boring at times. Really interesting at others. The girl was a better actor than the man.

reply

"The man" directed the film and wrote the screenplay.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

What are you talking about?
More RISQUÉ??
That's not fitting with the movie at all or with the characters.
Yes, it's a lot of dialog.
Sorry there was no Spider Man in it to keep you interested.

reply

He's a pedophile, he wanted to see more of the child in 'risque' sex scenes. Just check out his history.

reply

Oh... Okay
(Chills)
No I don't think I want to look at his history.
But I'm wondering how risqué he thinks a film like this could get. There are laws after all.
It's not like you're gonna see the kid naked or something. And like I said earlier it doesn't fit with what the movie was about. The man wasn't a pedo. At least I don't think so.

reply

no he wasn't. However, there's a difference between the book version of Gary and the movie version. The bath scene in the book version was a jaw dropper, but it was more about the control he had over her, he wanted to see how far he could go, to test the relationship.

If the movie version of Gary had done to Tommie what he had done in the book, she would told him to go screw himself and take her home.

reply