Why is a Youtube playlist on IMDB?


These are cheap 7 minute long videos. Why would an Internet Movie Database need this here? It cheapens everything IMDB stands for.

reply

It's still a movie!

------------

'Slippy flappy suck sook!'--Lappy Slapsum, "The Rage of Friction"

reply

Video media web supported.
Movies and tv series are dated models anyway, and IMDb has been moving with it's time for a while.

reply

That is very true. The series is just normal you tube fodder and not worth mentioning on this site. I think it's posted here as a needless statement.

reply

It cheapens everything IMDB stands for?
What does it stands for?
It contains countless video media, documentaries, web series, podcast, videoclips, videogames.

Hell, Whil Wheaton's TableTop web podcast is here as a tv series.

Do you which to cleanse IMDb from what you consider unfit, which youtube series deserves to be here and which does not?

It had an original funding through kickstarter of more than 150.000$ before Kickstarter's cut.

Add to that whatever funding they received since they started and you've got a rather expensive web series, with I hope a lot of work behind it (I mean with such financial support you would expect it)

Then why shouldn't it be there, are McIntosh and Sarkeesian to trivial and insignificant to have their work displayed on IMDb for the world to rate, review and discuss?

What is the harm of it being here? Why is it wrong? Please tell me, I honestly want to know.

reply

It's some pessimist sitting in a chair giving negative reviews about video games. If you don't think that's trivial & insignificant then could I interest you in purchasing a Blu-Ray version of 'Saving Christmas'?

reply

It loses it's insignificance when it is funded, allegedly professional work with a lot of reach.
Especially when promoted by actors of the video game industry.

It's at least significant enough to get on IMDb.

Thanks for responding to one single point of my reply.

reply

... and you didn't need to respond at all.

reply

What did I not respond to?

reply

This series of videos cost over half a million dollars to develop. I think you should apologise for questioning it.

reply

"These are cheap 7 minute long videos..."

I love it when stupid people attack Anita Sarkeesian with attacks that are obviously wrong.

reply

ikr

It's like all those videos and stuff that point out when she says something factual without "any evidence whatsoever", it's like they're completely missing the point.

reply

I like it when stupid people call other people stupid.

reply

And what point might that be?

reply

Of all the countless criticism of the series (many of them very much legitimate), this has to be the weakest one. Yes it is just a web series, not a movie, but there are also IMDB entries for other web series.

reply

Asking a question is criticism - OMG You better call National Security - Who knows what I'll do next - You should rally all of those wonderful feminists together and harass the crap out of me until I learn my lesson. But "oh no" I just made another weak countless criticism!!! That's terrorismisming!!! You better get me fired from my job too ^_^ "Yeah, you have a nice day."

reply

"It cheapens everything IMDB stands for." is not asking a question, it's a value judgment.

But you seem to have mistaken me for some SJW/radical feminist. I'm no fan of Sarkeesian/McIntosh or Tropes vs. Women. In fact I think this series is complete trash and a great disservice to the gaming medium, gamers and especially anyone who genuinely advocates for quality representation of women in games. Their arguments are intellectually dishonest, occasionally even outright lying to fit their narrative. How anyone could consider this for any form of educational use (as AS herself has advocated for) is beyond me.

But it still has a place here on IMDB. There is no practical limit on the number of entries and IMDB doesn't discriminate on quality (there are also plenty of bad movies here). So the only somewhat valid argument would be, that this is a web series and not a movie or TV show. But since many other web series (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1635327/ and http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1230180/ for example) also have their own entries, even review/critique oriented ones, I see no reason to exclude Tropes vs. Women either (no matter how bad/misguided it might be).

In fact, one could argue that this notion to suppress or censor information that one doesn't like is more akin to the standard SJW tactic. I prefer to let ideas stand on their own merits and let viewers/readers decide for themselves and give feedback (something that feminist frequency also doesn't believe in, seeing the way they handle YT comments or any kind of viewer feedback). IMDB could be such a place to discuss the content of the series, unlike the YT comments, which are disabled for all their videos.

reply