MovieChat Forums > The Girlfriend Experience (2016) Discussion > Riley's acting - disconnected or wooden?

Riley's acting - disconnected or wooden?


I'm watching the lead actress and can't decide if she can act or not. I guess I'd need to see her in other roles. She seems either really good at acting disconnected, or is just putting out a really wooden/robotic performance. Does anyone that has seen her other work have an opinion on whether she's talented or not?

reply

She's just bad, but it works okay.

reply

She was great in Magic Mike..

reply

Oh, I didn't even know she was in that?

reply

I don't know how else or how better to portray a character who who has a lot on her mind but keeps it to herself. She had to keep her secret life from her family and coworkers and her private life from her clients. So she never said more than she had to say. Yet, thru her tone of voice, body language and especially her very expressive eyes, Riley Keough was able to make the character very believable with minimal dialog or scenes to explain her actions. Whether confident, embarrassed, happy, angry, frightened, nervous or bored, she was able to convincingly portray her feelings for a character who wasn't very talkative unless she was lying. I thought she was terrific in the role.

reply

The character of Christine is intended to be reserved and distant. A bad actor with no range would not be able to pull it off. Bad acting tends to be over-stated, rather than understated.

reply

I think the character was meant to feel disconnected and cold. She was called cynical and selfish by many people. She even asked herself if she could be a sociopath (or psychopath?). She wasn't meant to be likeable in the traditional sense of a main character.

She is the opposite of this in Mad Max: Fury Road. Her performance there was anything but disconnected and wooden (the scene where Angharad falls from the Rig is an example). In fact, I didn't even realize they were the same actresses at first, because her character in this is so different.

So, to me, her performance fits the character and her other acting jobs shows that she does have range, and that this isn't just how she is but how she was portraying the character.

What a lovely day!

reply

Also:

The Inside Look at the end of "Provocation" has some good but short insights to her character which continues to support the idea that she's supposed to come off as disconnected (they even used that word). In particular, they mention how she uses people up to the point that she doesn't need them anymore and then discards them, even in examples as simple as the way she used the chat roulette windows to get herself off, and then shuts the laptop (and basically shutting off the guy she was videoing with), to finish herself.

What a lovely day!

reply

shes a stick figure if she was willing to act then there would be something to care about .the issue with shows likes this that approach this source material is that if its too deadpan then its unrealistic .Hollywood libtards are trying to draw a line between whoring in real life and whoring in hollywood when the reality is they are one in the same .this chick is just another hollywood whore willing surpress her values and morals to make a buck.It just reenforces the story type that women are gold digging whore s

I love having some mystery to the character without having to question who he is "

reply

I think you are reading way too much into this show and character...we don't need everything explained to us...nor everything wrapped up in a bow..this is one woman's story..like it or not..watch it or not..

reply

shes a stick figure if she was willing to act then there would be something to care about .the issue with shows likes this that approach this source material is that if its too deadpan then its unrealistic .Hollywood libtards are trying to draw a line between whoring in real life and whoring in hollywood when the reality is they are one in the same .this chick is just another hollywood whore willing surpress her values and morals to make a buck.It just reenforces the story type that women are gold digging whore s


I didn't think the character or acting was deadpan.

The overall tone, and choice of words, of the post is much what I would expect the character Jack to say about Christine and women in general. And it does not surprise me that some men would have that type of reaction to the character based on how Christine rejected Jack. She did handled it wrong, but not because Jack deserved better, but because it was to her disadvantage to feed into his frustration, which was something the audience could see coming, but she couldn't.

reply

I recommend rewatching Episode 4 to see that her acting is not wooden unless the scene calls for it. That episode gave Riley Keough the chance to portray a variety of emotions. She deftly handles a very awkward conversation with Kevin when he tells her he can’t afford her and asks if she can lower her rate because he’s in love with her. She is uncomfortable but remains sweet and smiling and says she’ll figure something out for him. As so often happens in this show, you can see the wheels turning in her mind as she is thinking more than she is saying. Later she coldly tells Kevin that she won’t make any exceptions in her rates.

She has a very realistic sounding conversation with her sister, laughingly making fun of her sister’s comments about a group therapy experience. But she takes on a serious (wooden?) tone when telling her sister she doesn’t like spending time with anyone unless something is being accomplished and uncomfortably telling her sister she’s too busy when her sister wants to spend a few days with her.

With client Michael, she’s sitting in his lap, laughing and sweetly flirting with him.

At David Tellis’ office party, she initially looks uncomfortable, which would be natural for a new intern at her boss’s party. But she loosens up and laughs when David talks with her.

Walking and talking with client Ryan, she chats about her lack of interactions with other people. It’s very similar to what she told her sister and might be the only time she was ever honest with a client when talking about herself. She laughs at his joke but her face conveys an immediate mood change when he says, “I’m F’ing with you. Hey, I’m F’ing you. That’s even better.” Without words, she convincingly looks both annoyed and embarrassed when reminded that these men may act interested in what she has to say but ultimately want her primarily for sex.

Back with Michael, we see her exerting control over their sex encounter and then laughing when his conversation is reduced to telling her about his foot fungus.

Having a drink with Davis Tellis, she is bright and witty.

While saying very little during the call in which Ryan’s wife offers her money to stay away, she is able to use her face, especially her eyes, to show nervousness, followed by defiance (“What if I don’t want your money?”) to opportunism (when offered as much as $20,000). Meeting with the wife to collect her money, she appears cool and collected but afterward shakes so badly she can’t hold her drink.

So while some of the scripts required her to be cold and unemotional, that is not because of the actress. Episode 4 gives Riley Keough a variety of behaviors and emotions to portray. She always makes the scene appear realistic with the right tone or look or mannerisms, often just using her very expressive eyes to give us a clue as to what the character is thinking but not saying.

reply

Very well said. I think on rewatches the little details become even more apparant. That's a good example with Michael, and leads me to the next scene where she breaks down in the bathroom after his death while her clients are waiting for her. That whole scene was very emotional.

What a lovely day!

reply

Good job, Finnegan.

I am mezmerized by this actress, she is deeply mysterious because we do get only glimpses here and there of her inner self. I choose to think that is intended, by the actress and by the director.

Riley Keogh carries this series easily. I its a very strong performance.

I will also mention, since I dont know where else to put it, that she is impeccably dressed. They dress her like a wealthy and sophisticated New Yorker in clean simple lines, beautifully tailored to cit her. Whoever does the costuming is spot on.

Her makeup is simple and clea. The one thngI'd like to do it cut about 8" from her hair, it is too long and wispy.

reply

She's deliberately playing disconnected, and incredibly well, too. There's a lot going on beneath the surface that you can only see in subtleties like her eyes or vocal delivery or body language. The show itself also has a sometimes detached and cold way of direction that can distance itself from the audience.

If you want to see wooden, try Sasha Grey's take in the show's inspiration, Soderberg's The Girlfriend Experience.

There's something I know when I'm with you that I forget when I'm away

reply

She is a true sociopath who feels nothing, nor has a conscience. This is planned and Riley is playing her perfectly. People need to understand that actors play a character the way a director wants.

reply

Riley is playing her perfectly.

I was very impressed with Riley throughout the series. She totally sells every scene with her eyes, mannerisms, body language, etc. In the scene when the PI surprised her at work and told her he knew all about who she really was and threatened to reveal her secret life to family and coworkers, Riley said nothing. But she looked absolutely terrified. It was a terrific scene that very realistically advanced the plot without her saying a single word. In other episodes just the inflections in her voice (from very soft to commanding) made the dialog completely believable. In the episode where she visited her family, she didn't have to say much to convey her discomfort with her own family or fear and nervousness at what guests at the party might know about her. The scenes between her and her father were very well acted, as you could see the wheels turning in her mind, wondering if she could even maintain a relationship with him when she looked at him.

I had never heard of Riley prior to this show. Since then, I saw her in Mad Max, in which she had little to do but look pretty in the background. Then I watched Dixieland, which she co-produced and starred in (no coincidence there 😉). It was probably her biggest role prior to GFE but she essentially played a stereotype (poor white trash southern girl meets poor white trash ex-con boy). I wasn't impressed with that movie and thought her acting was nothing above the ordinary. But GFE gave her the chance to portray a complex character with great writing and directing and Riley really shined in the role. I know she has some movies in the works and I hope she continues to show the great skill she demonstrated in GFE that made the series seem so believable.

reply

[deleted]

If the role is that of a sociopath she is meant to be playing, then she does not do a good job at it. If however she is just calculative logical minded and a selfish greedy introvert, then she does a fine job at it. Sociopaths don't go crying in the bathroom on their own. When they cry, there is a reason for it and it is usually done in a more public setting, for show to garner sympathy. Sociopaths also fake being normal way better than she does here.

reply

Wooden.

reply