MovieChat Forums > The Overnight (2015) Discussion > So disappointed in....

So disappointed in....

posted 9 years ago by WhenAmyMetSalad
11 replies | jump to latest

I know the director was trying to change it around with more male nudity and less female nudity as stated in an interview, but you cant really do that while using prosthetic penises. I mean it was very obvious. A male's genital does not stay pointing in one direction "soft" and stay stiff. I see much female nudity without them using a prosthetic vagina. a man needs to MAN UP and show his junk on screen.

Yes I know. A girl crying about fake men genitalia. Oh wow. but Hollywood needs to be more equal.

-On October 3rd He asked me what day it was "What day is it?" "It's October 3rd"-

[–] jaybeebrad 9 years ago

The only reason they used prosthetics is because the size of the character's penises was relevant to the plot and they had a dialog about it within the actual film. What did you want them to do, only consider actors for the roles whose real life penises matched the sizes of the characters they were going to portray?

[–] WhenAmyMetSalad 9 years ago

Yeah actually. I would have preferred that. but both men were wearing prosthetics and it took away from that part of the story.

-On October 3rd He asked me what day it was "What day is it?" "It's October 3rd"-

[–] Lord-Bigglesworth 8 years ago

If you're looking for movies where actors are cast solely on the size of their genitalia and not on their acting abilities or chemistry with co-stars, the genre you're looking for is called "porn". It's a big thing on the internet these days.

You'd feel cocky too if you were full of myself.

[–] Catbookss (13664) 7 years ago

That's exactly what I thought.

Just caught this on Netflix the other night. Strange, yet at the same time oddly endearing movie.

[–] sm-amg63 9 years ago

Exactly what movies are you watching where you see close ups of female anatomy? If anything they show fake pubes or something but nothing like the way penis is shown in basically every comedy these days. You never see the vagina(lips, slit etc).

And to your point. Both of these actors are awesome at what they do, it's not practical to find some *beep* actors that "fit" that scene for the sake of showing you a real dick. Use Google for your curiosity. Jeeze

[–] spank-my-17 8 years ago

Trance had a scene focusing on a shaved vagina.. I don't know if that helps, but I saw it not long ago. :)

[–] RavyDavyGravy 8 years ago

Not just any shaved vagina. Rosario Dawson's!

[–] sm-amg63 8 years ago

Yes I'm aware of that movie but it wasn't even really in any theaters or in Redbox and Netflix like this one. But anyways, props to Rosario Dawson on that!

[–] SilverGameDog 8 years ago

I totally agree. While I personally have no interest in seeing more penis in films, there is definitely a double standard.
The biggest male actors like Brad Pitt or Johnny Depp would probably never go fully nude in a film and show their penis. But the biggest female actors will and have gone fully nude in films.
I personally think it's because women are beautiful nude. It's like art.
Men nude is disgusting with things hanging... Lol

[–] leazy10 8 years ago

Biggest double standard is that they showing penises in movies even erect but vulvas are forbidden. In my life I saw only 2-3 movies with vulva exposed. With penises? Hard to count. A huge amount of movies. If you talk about a double standard do not be a hypocrite. Vulva is the biggest taboo of Hollywood.

[–] modica (4169) 5 years ago

This is a stupid discussion. Men have their parts on the outside and women have them on the inside. I mean really.