now at 284m - same as John Carter
wow!
shareAs the headline suggests, Solo has become one of those relatively newfangled bombs which actually earns quite a bit worldwide ($250-$350 million) but costs so much that it turns out to be a huge loser anyway. So, yes, Solo has earned more than The Lone Ranger ($260m in 2013) and John Carter ($284m in 2012) and the likes of Green Lantern, Jack the Giant Slayer and Battleship. But to see Solo pulling these kind of numbers is a little remarkable, as for the first time Star Wars has joined the ranks of ordinary men.share
now at 343m - same as Star Trek Beyond
sharenow at 353m - same as XMen First Class
shareactually looking at the domestic comparisons its done quite well - now at 202m - same as WWZ, Cinderella, and just passing Spectre, Godzilla. and should end up with about a 210m total (BatBegins, MI4, Fast 5, 300, Dawn Apes, Sherlock 1 etc)
its just been let down by the awful foreign box office (like Bat Begins which it'll prob end up doing similar overall)
Quiet well? It's going to lose around $100 million, and is drastically lower than other modern blockbusters. They expected this to do a $1 billion+ (and needed it to).
sharewas just looking at the domestic when compared to other movies around the same.. but yeh compared to what a SW movie shud do dom/foreign its an absolute disaster
share