MovieChat Forums > Sniper: Legacy (2015) Discussion > Its not that bad for a Sequel to a movie...

Its not that bad for a Sequel to a movie series with a shotty history .


Sniper was a original great!
Its sequels how ever have been less than desirable.

This is the first sniper sequel i feel has at least met the quality of the first.

Beringer is getting old and it shows.

and these new snipers seem to miss alot more than i would expect :p.

but over all it was ok.

better then i expected it to be anyways.

Raylan GIvens: didn't i tell you you were gonna wish i killed ya... well don't ya?

reply

To be fair, #3 had Billy Zane. That immediately added 3-5 points to its grade.

reply

I thought Zane came back in the 4th one (aka the one without Tom Berenger)

DAMN

reply

You're correct. I was thinking their were only 2 Berenger movies before the son was introduced. Forgot Sniper 3. Who could forget Sniper 3?

reply

I tried to, but it does exist

DAMN

reply

Anyone watching this with extremely low expectations might enjoy the movie even with all it's faults.
Personally if I was to be a tad critical then I thought the movie was a bag of shyte, narrowly escaping the award of two bags of shyte.
Please flush now and save the paying public from viewing the sniper turd

reply

[deleted]

Someone leaked it early

reply

This series and 90% of other military type films are always unrealistic and B to C type quality at best. Restrepo and Gunners Palace the only real films out there the rest are just action films nothing more. All the Sniper films were crap to me. Now that's just my opinion I don't care what others think. They like it good for them.

Dr.Nichole MD. Oh and Nicky was here. :D

I never revisit posts. Too busy and way above arguing.

reply

Dude the two movies you named as good, were both documentaries. A tad unfair.

reply

Nicky, you really need to stop taking your entertainment so damn seriously. If realism is so important to you, stop watching fiction.

reply