uhhh, "Angels"?
Isn't this exactly the same as his previous movie "Angels"? the premise seems to be exactly the same...
shareIsn't this exactly the same as his previous movie "Angels"? the premise seems to be exactly the same...
share[deleted]
You're correct.
I heard about this film a few years ago.
Angels was probably struggling to get distribution for a few years so the director sneakily decided to hire Scott Adkins for some re-shoots and put his name all over the posters so his fan base would want to see it.
I am not a professional writer so please excuse any writing mistakesshare
This is Angels with Adkins added. You guys are correct and it sucks. Angels was a drama. Adkins was added later to appeal to action fans and now, the film is a rip-off. They should have just made a new film.
You have to admire the producers creativity.
It's that man again!!