This is a profoundly significant exposition of the practical side of evolution. Why are there no comments? Is it just the usual, boring, American evangelical prohibition against all thoughts evolutionary? Come on, people. Give me some sugar!
Dr. Shubin has done well this early in the series. I particularly like the 'hands-on, dirty work in remote locations' aspects of the science. The answers don't just come about by opening the 'good book'. I do find it odd the few science blogs I visit have not given a shout out as they did with Cosmos with Dr. DeGrasse-Tyson.
I am a fan of the not-well-received 'aquatic ape theory'. So I was mildly irked by the consensus-driven timeline displayed on the show. Anyways, until the questions raised by the theory are addressed rather than dismissed, life and science move on.
____________________
When animals forage, is it for grocery, hardware or medicine?
I do find it odd the few science blogs I visit have not given a shout out as they did with Cosmos with Dr. DeGrasse-Tyson.
Exactly my thoughts. I bought the first edition hard cover and thought the "get down and dirty" aspect of practical paleontological science depicted therein was very honest and educational.
I am fuzzy about the "aquatic ape" (I shall read up about it again) but in the end all cherished notions live or die by the evidence or eventual lack of it.
Cosmos has definitely overshadowed pretty much everything else, right now. I do love it, though.
reply share