MovieChat Forums > Hit & Run (2015) Discussion > date and details wrong

date and details wrong


It says its not released and in production but I'm watching it on channel five?

reply

Yes I watched it too. Just checked back to see if anyone had commented as I didn't think it was that great.

The cast list is correct but the plot had nothing to do with blackmail by a former cop!

reply

I didn't even finish the last half hour. Thought the lawyer was ridiculous, the stalker was walking right behind her, and was clearly in her line of vision, and the lawyer never spotted her. Plus, it took so long for her to suspect there was something wrong with this weirdo who kept acting so creepy and clingy. Jose D also had cheek implants put in and they detract from her natural beauty. Not a good look. Did not find the PI friend attractive, and the ex was unbelievable, the way he kept following her.

reply

Whenever she was in her line of vision, she was preoccupied with Jack.

She is kinda dumb, but makes up for it in a lot of ways, but that's not enough to ward off Anna/Vanessa.

The ex was kinda comical.  Probably about as dumb as her, but with less to make up for it. 

reply

I am not sure about the cheek implants. This picture of her from Charles In Charge looks the same cheek wise:

http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2477507328/nm0004861?ref_=nmmd_md_nxt

I do think there is some major botox involved though.

reply

I've just watched it on Channel 5 for the second time. It was detailed as 'Hit And Run' (2012) which I had difficulty finding on IMDb search. I only found it on here by detailing Josie Davis and her character name of Heather Williams on Yahoo search. Yahoo details this movie as 'Accidental Obsession' (2015) and gives it's IMDb page under that title. Otherwise I don't think I would have found it. It's very confusing when both the title and the release date are under question.

reply

Here, here. Just spent ages looking for it, had to go through similar hoops. The search facility on IMDB is pretty poor, I've had trouble in the past - I suppose it costs too much to get Google to do it, so that it would pick up mis-spellings and alternate titles(especially useful when looking up old British movies and those that are linguistically challenged e.g. 'Rubber Giants' 'Fun at St. Fanny's')

Bill Brooks

reply

[deleted]