MovieChat Forums > Jem and the Holograms (2015) Discussion > I enjoyed it! A positive review?

I enjoyed it! A positive review?


I'm an original Jem fan. I have a VHS with me at 4 years old dancing and singing to a Jem song (ughhhh.. LOL) I have other VHSs with taped episodes from SATELLITE. I was like everyone else when I first saw the trailer, a little let down (or A LOT let down like some of you.... most?). But over time, I was able to think about this film and saw how the movie makers wanted to update Jem and bring it to life in modern day. Yes, they COULD have made it set in the 1980s, but todays younger audience just wouldn't "get" it, thus solely making this movie for 30-40 something year olds, and that just COULD NOT work for a big motion picture. Jem and the Holograms isn't for the 30-40 year old demographic whether you want to believe it or not. Todays younger audience is all about social media, youtube and twitter, facebook and snapchat, selfies and the online world. And expressing yourself on social media and how you portray yourself is something todays younger demographic is "all about".

The movie changes a lot, but keeps a lot as well. I think making Eric Raymond a female is an okay choice. Rio being her son an okay choice. Rio knowing the true identity of Jem a fine choice (otherwise he would come off as a complete idiot!), even Synergy being what she is, a fine choice! I just wish Synergy would have had something more to do with the Holograms becoming real holograms and possibly even having a humanized version hologram of herself projected from her robot self. Back in the 80's a "computer that could produce holograms!" would have been a MASSIVE computer. Things are a bit different in 2015, and tiny little electronic equipments, like the size of a cell phone, can do incredible things. I also wish the holograms would have still been projected onto the girls, from Jems earrings. I think all of this would have been believable.

I think each girl played their parts respectfully. It was nice to see Aja as the techie. She has this rebel sense to her. Awesome that they kept Shana as a hopeful fashion designer. The actually gave Kimber some similar backbone to what her character in the cartoon had. And most of all, I loved Jem in this film. She was beautiful and on point. That's JEM I'm talking about. Jerrica on the other hand, I believe, had the perfect normal next door neighbor girl alter persona. If Jerrica had also looked like this beautiful mega star, then it would have been too easy to recognize her. Some of Jem's make-up and hair was PERFECT. I truly saw Jem in those final scenes of the film, especially when she is speaking to Synergy. She just really looked and acted the part.

The music. I loved it. I've always wanted to hear a MODERN Jem, who could be on todays radio. Aubrey pulled it off with her vocals. The few actual Jem songs in the movie, have heart, meaning, and the vocals are beautiful! Obviously I can't stop talking about the vocals. And OBVIOUSLY, everyone wanted Britta back in the chair, but the girl isn't seventeen years old anymore people. We don't want to see Jem on the movie screen singing some pre-recorded, not her own, vocals sung by the original, who doesn't sound like the seventeen year old she once was. They found a beautiful young actress who has the vocal chops to back herself up. I loved that her first acoustic performance was sung live on screen, and she didn't lip sync to a track. Girl can sing.

Back to Synergy. I was PLEASANTLY surprised to see that they had to go and do a scavenger type hunt for clues to complete her. Jem and the Holograms in the original had to go and find Synergy by following clues as well. I loved how the pier clue included the musical note pipes coming out of the pier, resembling the original Synergy, who looked almost similar to a Piano Organ. It almost looked as if the original Synergy could have been sitting there on the pier. When Jem puts her earrings in Synergy and the first hologram is projected, it was magical. I was like "That's no video projection, that's a hologram!" (Again, I wish actual HOLOGRAMS were incorporated more)

Finally, The Misfits. It set it up perfectly. Erica needs to do something to fight her son Rio, and Jem and the Holograms. Little did we know that The Misfits were once already signed to Starlight. They all looked great, and including Jetta was a great idea!

The sequel could have been Jem and the Holograms VS The Misfits, putting both bands in an epic battle of the bands for a higher power of taking control of Starlight Enterprises. We could have seen more original characters, more HOLOGRAMS, the Rockin Roadster, Raya joining the Holograms, Jem getting a mansion and calling it Starlight House, where Aunt Bailey would come and help take care of other foster girls, otherwise known as the Starlight Girls. ETC.

This film was clearly (almost like) a prequel. And that's okay. I think they did a great job with it. They re-introduced Jem to todays younger audience. Or they wanted to.... I thought for sure they would easily exceed their budget of $5 million, green lighting the sequel that would have been a greater experience for fans of the original. I'm not so sure now what is to become of this new Jem. That sequel would have been nice. I want it to happen, but with each passing day, it's looking more and more less likely.

I wish more fans of the original would have gone into this with an open mind, instead of just jumping to conclusions and spewing hatred and nothing more than just pure hatred. The film was enjoyable. I've grown up always wanting to see JEM AND THE HOLOGRAMS on the big screen in the theater, and today, I got to do just that. 30 years later.


PS. First day blu-ray purchase.



- M. WOOD

reply

Okay, thank you for this! I don't understand the hate for this movie at all... It's not like it's a complete crap fest. Most reboots of old TV shows nowadays are completely different, and NO ONE seems to complain.

I never really watched the original show, but I knew of it and parts about it, so the Misfits scene really made me excited for a sequel.

HOPEFULLY they make one. If they do, they can market Kesha and that would bring in a bigger audience probably.

reply

Because it's bad

reply

Awesome review ?

reply

That question mark was supposed to be a smiley :)

reply

Quit blaming the fans for this films failure. It couldn't even make 5 million on opening weekend which goes to show that todays younger audience didn't even want to see it. It's great that you liked it but it's clear that few people are interested in this new take and that falls on the studio, director, producers, and writers not the fans.

reply

[deleted]

Stop your blame shifting. I'm getting sick and tired of it.

reply

I find it odd that people are going out of their way to tell the Jem fanbase they enjoyed this film. I mean, do you want a cookie? Good for you that you enjoyed the film. Personally, I can see that it's a generic "Star is born" film that has been done so many times, that I've already seen "Jem" without seeing it. It's not refreshing, it isn't new, it is NOT in any way representative of what was so amazing about the cartoon.

OF COURSE a Jem film would and should be for the demographic that grew up watching it. Those women in their 30s and 40s could take their daughters to see the film and get familiar with the franchise. That's without a doubt the largest demographic for Jem, not tweens who have never heard of the show and are not likely to be interested in a "clean" movie such as this one. And why does the film NEED to be a motion picture? I have no doubt a proper Netflix series or film could have been executed well, with the proper clothing, special effects, etc. Jem fans don't necessarily NEED a major film release. We need a film that's DONE RIGHT. Jem has a such a cult status that a major film release was a bad idea to begin with.

If this generation wants to be introduced to Jem, they'd be better off watching the actual series from the 80s. If they've seen Disney's "The Cheetah Girls", they've already seen this film.

reply

It is MY review, and we are all allowed to have one. <3

- M. WOOD

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

It's your review and you are allowed to make one but it's still stupid! :)
This movie tanked because it was horrible and it deserved all the negative reviews and hate from the fans of the original cartoons.

reply

Lol you're on the Jem movie board, and a review was posted.....?

reply

Personally, I can see that it's a generic "Star is born" film that has been done so many times, that I've already seen "Jem" without seeing it. It's not refreshing, it isn't new, it is NOT in any way representative of what was so amazing about the cartoon
I watched it the other day and you were right. It was exactly what I thought it would be.

reply

I honestly wouldn't have paid to see this if it had its original name 'Famous'. The plot is just too overdone. All they did was change the name, threw in a fijit and a treasure hunt. Maybe I'll watch it on cable but please stop blaming us fans for not spending our hard earned money on this film.

reply

Yeah, I don't understand this guy either, if he wants people to respect his opinion and reviews, at least he has to respect our decisions as well: that not every fan of Jem will ever see this. It's not our fault this failed btw.... blame it on the marketing of the trailers, at least!

reply

Just saw this! I really wasn't meaning to blame the fans for the failure of the film at all! Reading back, I see how it comes off that way. The fact is, it failed. The blame can be put on anyone.

- M. WOOD

reply

I'm still happy to blame *some* of the fanbase. I'm not talking about people disinterested enough to go see it - we shouldn't be sheep and nobody should be forced to go see something we don't want to.

I'm talking about those who staged huge boycott campaigns based on assumptions and bias, without ever trying to judge something on its merits. Those who consistently trolled EVERYONE to do with making this movie, including the actors and anyone else who supported the movie (even, in some cases, the very people who brought the cartoon to life).

I'm talking about those who orchestrated what was a particularly nasty online campaign to make sure that - because THEIR version of Jem wasn't appearing on screen - that NOBODY else should ever get to enjoy it.

I'm talking about people who still spout rubbish about this movie and spread misinformation about it - in spite of never having seen it.

There is likely a stack of reasons this movie failed. The actions by those above is DEFINITELY and ABSOLUTELY one of the reasons.

reply

I absolutely agree, the movie is seriously underrated. I'm an original Jem fan, too, and I loved it. My daughter came with me and loved it too; she wants to see the cartoon now!

reply

Yes! I watched Jem as a child, have tshirts and the DVDs that I've worn and watched in my adulthood because I loved it so much. I saw this film (with Patricia Alice Albrecht!!), and I had such a good time. The heart of Jem is all there, which is always the goal when a form of media crosses genre. Christy Marx (who is in the film!) wrote a cartoon, not a comic book, not a screenplay. They all stand on their own, which is beautiful. But the heart of Jem was absolutely in the film, which is why I cried while watching it. It's fun, a little kitschy, filled with sweet tunes and many shoutouts to the cartoon--including appearances from so many beloved people in the Jem world. It's got so much heart! I am glad I got over my skepticism to try it. I walked into the theater, literally saying, "It's going to be terrible, I'm sure," but decided to see it because of the legacy. And I was with Pizzazz, so no-brainer. I'm glad I was wrong. Of course, everyone is entitled to not get over themselves, but I'm glad I did.

All I can think about is all the haters who were upset about the film adaptation of Baum's Oz series, how it failed with its modern touches and eliminations. It, too, did not recoup its finances in the first year. I hope Jon Chu watches The Wizard of Oz when it broadcasts for the zillionth time on network television this year as an American classic. Sure, his version of Jem is unlikely to have the staying power of TWoO, obviously, but I hope it's also a reminder to him that naysayers so committed to the way things were don't always have the staying power, either.

reply

I enjoyed it too, I liked the songs and the acting and singing was actually great, and that was pretty much as high as my expectations were for a drastically aged down version of these characters. Costumes, syling, set design and art direction were all really on point but the director was relying on them waaay to heavily. But I think that the big failure of this film was editing at almost every level. It seemed pretty obvious that a massive amount of stuff was cut and at one point Aja and Rio both refer to things happening that we don't see, but we're clearly intended to have been shown They get to the first gig super fast and I feel like there was something missing like an extra scavenger clue or something. They really rush through the story. Also the insertion of Youtube clips got really old really fast.

Anyway the thing that infuriated me was that they tease what would have been an awesome film: Juliette Lewis' sinister Erica Raymond and Keshas dirty-girl Pizzazz vs Idealist Rio and Role-Model Jem . Why the hell didn't they make THAT movie!?!? They could have skipped the low budget origin story and really made the action-adventure-rock-n-roll movie that Jem should have been.

Bare in mind I watched it at 4am after smoking a LOT of weed so it could have been a masterpiece of modern cinema or a celluloid abortion and I would never have known.

It would have been great if they had targeted it at a demographic who gave a crap or even remember what Jem was, but they didn't make that movie. I'm still going to force my 8 year old niece to begrudgingly watch it. Unlike me, she will not be stoned.

reply

reply

Making it for the people who remembered it, would've narrowed the audience even more.

reply