They practically raped HIM!

Found the incel

Well yes, within the context of the movie and its plot etc, that is what happened, and they even tortured him in other ways and attempted to kill him afterwards, they were essentially female villains in this movie.

Uhhhh she did rape him later, the first time was consensual

He wasn't a villain. Just an infallible victim.

Also, do you think that act ITSELF has in any way affected him negatively, including emotionally AND physically, even with that crazy femme fatale chick being a perpetrator? Besides it being wrong in a moral sense, illegal in a legal one and pretty much "it" from a dictionary definition? Obviously not saying it was nothing, but do you think it really hurt him that badly, and no less than other physical acts they perpetuated against him?

2 SandyR- does it honestly really make any difference? They wanted to hurt and humiliate him as well and in that scene took him against his will without asking his permission.

BESIDES, SPEAKING STRICTLY ALSO FROM A CINEMATIC point of view -

Regardless of what either female character could or couldn't do even by virtue of being an attractive woman alone with a male character, despite how of course disturbing the overall subject is, as well as anything tied to it with regards to law, morality etc...

Would it not be as interesting, intriguing, DISTURBING even or even say riveting albeit in a dark adult movie sort of way and in a, perhaps, "interesting cinematic" twist certain way with maybe even a flair of something unusual and less mundane...

If that scene there was just a typical consensual sex scene and making it instead a female on male "you know what" adds, perhaps, a layer of cinematic CONTROVERSY to it, and we can, perhaps, debate that type of scene on that level - a less than usual and unexpected slice of DISTURBING CINEMA LEVEL?

Is that not also, perhaps, food for thought? Just thinking?
(Obviously, real life and all notwithstanding, plus, it is a movie after all.)

2 SandyR also - a similar question was once asked in a review for the Ed Wood scripted but directed by William Morgan 50s black comedy "classic" trash flick "The Violent Years" (1956) and in that film, for instance, even with its general silliness overall, its female lead character could have it as well anytime she wanted to, BUT... Because she was a sociopathic criminal for whom even MURDER of innocents wasn't in any way crossing the line, it is unfortunate, but its not too surprising (or maybe it is, depend on how STRONGLY you feel about "the subject" in and of itself overall) that she also decided to force herself sexually on at least one male character in the name of power and control and to hurt him etc. And the guy clearly didn't want it and it was even reported in the newspaper in that movie, although they used the term "assault" in it more than the r word or even with a "sexual" word in pretext.