[deleted]


[deleted]


what does she think of her co-star accused sexual assault ?

reply

That's an interesting question. I wonder about that, too.

reply

Any time someone defends a known pedophile like the guy who Kyle merc'd, it lets you know exactly where they stand.

Like you, I wasn't going to see this anyway, but I need to make sure I avoid all future Rachel Zegler movies, too.

Can't stand the pro-pedophile crowd.

reply

Aren't you the guy who defended the murder of George Floyd?

reply

The guy who said he couldn't breath before he was put in the recovery position?
https://youtu.be/0gQYMBALDXc?t=616

reply

Does that justify what the cop did? I already knew that fyi.

reply

What did the cop do?

reply

Um... Kneeled on his neck...

reply

so?

reply

Is that right? Or legal?

reply

If it's right/legal to restrain an intoxicated suspect whose resisting arrest?

reply

Floyd was handcuffed, unarmed and on the ground, the cop was with two other armed guards at his back. Why was he kneeling on his neck?

reply

He was handcuffed while on his feet and in the back of a car, the three of them had a difficult time controlling him. One was kneeling on his neck, one was kneeling on his ass and one was kneeling on his legs.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/06/25/03/30007230-8457641-While_State_Governor_Tim_Waltz_and_a_number_of_other_public_offi-a-108_1593050935836.jpg

reply

Answer my question.

reply

Because Chauvin was kneeling behind Floyd's neck?

reply

Was that correct?

reply

It looks like Chauvin is the one behind the neck/head? https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/06/25/03/30007230-8457641-While_State_Governor_Tim_Waltz_and_a_number_of_other_public_offi-a-108_1593050935836.jpg

reply

Wow man how many times you going to dodge the question? Was what Chauvin did to Floyd right?

reply

If it's right for a police officer to contribute in restraining a suspect?

reply

See you won't answer the question. Typical from boot lickers. So you are saying that what the cop did was correct then? Yes or no was what Chauvin did to Floyd correct?

reply

What is Chauvin's job?

reply

Answer the question.

reply

Contribute in the restraining of the apprehended person?

reply

Answer the question.

reply

The question was?

Why was he kneeling on his neck?

reply

I asked why he was kneeling on his neck and if it was right?

reply

I answered:

- He was handcuffed while on his feet and in the back of a car, the three of them had a difficult time controlling him. One was kneeling on his neck, one was kneeling on his ass and one was kneeling on his legs.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/06/25/03/30007230-8457641-While_State_Governor_Tim_Waltz_and_a_number_of_other_public_offi-a-108_1593050935836.jpg

- Because Chauvin was kneeling behind Floyd's neck?

- It looks like Chauvin is the one behind the neck/head? https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/06/25/03/30007230-8457641-While_State_Governor_Tim_Waltz_and_a_number_of_other_public_offi-a-108_1593050935836.jpg

- If it's right for a police officer to contribute in restraining a suspect?

- What is Chauvin's job?

- Contribute in the restraining of the apprehended person
https://www.insider.com/minneapolis-police-trained-to-use-neck-restraint-george-floyd-2020-7

reply

Nope that is not an answer. I did not ask for a description of the event. I asked whether it was right or wrong what Chauvin did. Was it right or wrong no long winded answers that dance around the question.

reply

Right or wrong to do one's job?
https://www.insider.com/minneapolis-police-trained-to-use-neck-restraint-george-floyd-2020-7

reply

See you refuse to answer. Yes or no quit side stepping.

reply

Is it right or wrong that Chauvin did his job?

reply

See a side step yet again. So it's his job to kneel on his neck?

reply

https://www.insider.com/minneapolis-police-trained-to-use-neck-restraint-george-floyd-2020-7

reply

Nowhere does it say to do that to someone for the length of time he did it when the criminal is handcuffed and subdued as well as unarmed. So what he did was perfectly legal then and he should be a free man? Want to double down on that?

reply

What the length of time?
Corrupt courts!

reply

We are done here.

reply

We'll see!

reply

Looks like the court did not see your boy as some innocent person like you did. Looks like I won the debate here. Carry on.

reply

Courts in the DSA are corrupt.

reply

Kneeling on somebody's neck in order to restrain him/her is not the way Chauvin was supposed to do his job.

reply

...instructors and recruits alike are seen kneeling on subjects
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/minneapolis-ex-police-officer-says-training-included-kneeling-on-neck

reply

Kneeling on a subject's neck, thoracic area, or any place else that impairs or prevents a subject from breathing, however, is not the way a cop is supposed to kneel on a suspect.

reply

When police restrain a suspect, as often enough it's necessary to do, they need to exercise control, and not make it so that the suspect can't breathe. The cop in question was engaging in a dangerous method of control, which resulted in a life being taken, which was inexcusable. There are other ways of restraining a suspect without resulting in permanent injury or death to a suspect.

reply

The guy who said he couldn't breath before he was put in the recovery position?
https://youtu.be/0gQYMBALDXc?t=616

https://www.insider.com/minneapolis-police-trained-to-use-neck-restraint-george-floyd-2020-7

reply

Not by putting a knee on a suspect's neck, and therefore depriving him/her of the ability to breathe.

reply

Floyd was a big/belligerent guy.

reply

Floyd may have been a belligerent, unlikeable guy, but that still doesn't excuse the cop's putting his knee down on the guy's neck, thus preventing him from breathing.

reply

Lol, difficult time my arse. I've seen a lady cop just use her hands on a perps shoulders to hold him down with the same type of lay down. Besides, over 9 minutes on the neck is a no no.

reply

You've seen a lady cop just use her hands to restrain an intoxicated ​Floyd?

What is "over 9 minutes on the neck" based on?

reply

What is "woke" about West Side Story 2021? I would think the original Natalie Wood movie would be "more woke" considering the era that film was released... and maybe even the original where the Montagues were gunning down Capulets jogging on the wrong side of the street...

reply

What is "woke" about West Side Story 2021? I would think the original Natalie Wood movie would be "more woke"

The original movie portrayed what was in reality a very violent and dangerous Latin community in a positive way. But here's the thing: these old musicals portrayed everything as shiny and cheerful. In Mary Poppins chimney sweepers danced in the roof while in Camelot Middle Ages were clean and joyous. Even WW2 looked gorgeous and enjoyable in Bedknobs and Broomsticks. There wasn't any political agenda: these musicals made everything cheerful.

On the contrary, woke movies have a clear agenda: immigrants from shithole countries are good, whites are evil.

reply

IIRC both the Jets and the Sharks in the 1960 film were considered "bad" by the adults in the film (and also by the girls?)

I suppose casting Natalie Wood as a Puerto Rican (with her silly accent) might be considered "not woke." But we're not talking Mickey Rooney and John Wayne trying to be "Asian..."



reply

Am I supposed to be outraged by that tweet?

reply

Good thing I didn't like the original film, despite being forced to watch it in 6th grade due to my music teacher's obsession with musicals. Hearing this makes me even more motivated to avoid a no doubt woke and crappy remake with this bitch starring in it.

reply

Other movie I am not going to watch.

reply

I'm surprised the woke folk haven't jump all over her casting, not because of what she said but because she isn't Puerto Rican, not even from Puerto Rican parents. She's half Polish and half Columbian.. isn't this like casting Jim Carey as Malcom X in a woke warrior's eyes.

reply

Jeez. Zip it.

reply

The box office take seems to indicate the woke warriors aren't watching it.

reply

I have absolutely no intention of seeing Spielberg's reboot/remake of the film version of West Side Story, either, but yet I, too, find it rather disgusting that Rittenhouse got acquitted. I don't think it has anything to do with white privilege at all, but the fact that there are some manipulative people who saw to it that Rittenhouse was acquitted.

I'm not uncritical of the United States, which is where i was born and raised, where I still live, and, as far as I can see, will live the rest of my life out. It's possible to love one's country and yet be critical of it, as well.

I think that Rachel went a bit too far in calling the USA a "god-forsaken" country, and for a number of reasons that I posted here on another thread, I will be voting my pocketbook and not going to see Spielberg's reboot/remake of this film. I"ll stick with the original 1961 film version.

reply

Quit your yapping. We're all sick of your constant whining about WSS and your unwholesome obsession with actor Ansel Elgort, who sings and dances just fine in this new version. You will also be pleased that, though he doesn't have a nude scene, he is shirtless in one sequence.

reply

No, Metratron1970! YOU quit YOUR yapping! You've got a rather unwholesome attitude yourself. Out of curiosity, I listened to some of the sound track of Spielberg's film version of West Side Story, and did not like what I heard, at all. The musical score to the 2021 film version of West Side Story sounded overly bombastic, loud, and flat. Rachel Ziegler's singing voice was way too far back, on the high notes, and on the whole, she seems to have no control over it.

reply