Was Ben a good father?


I saw this film yesterday, and I'm still thinking about it. Do you think that Ben was a good father?

We are in no doubt that he loved his children. He taught them survival skills, and he nurtured their intellectual growth. The scene where his daughter was able to explain the Bill of Rights was a testament to his belief in their education. The fact that they all sat around a fire reading is a marked contrast to their cousins who could not draw themselves from games consoles or computer screens.

However, you have to ask what sort of father gives his children hunting knives or who takes them rock climbing? He also engaged in theft of food from a supermarket, with his children as willing accomplices? The accident with daughter on the roof is also an example of a man who would recklessly endanger his children even though his intentions are good.

reply

The ambiguity of his character, the serious flaws alongside the strengths, made this a very interesting and thought provoking movie. His children loved him fiercely, but were also aware of problems they would face as they grew up.

reply

At the risk of overdoing it, if Hitler had had children, I am sure they would have loved him too. And there is a documentary about the sons of two officers of the Third Reich who have complex and different view of their own father and the other's father. You cannot use just the love of the child for the parent, because a child will often love an abuser because they do not really see what is going on.

reply

I just looked up that documentary and requested it from my public library.

Thanks

reply

Having his children stealing probably isnt that best way too go lol

reply

[deleted]

Pros:

Healthy, they are not overweight and have physical attribute of athletes, can do alot of things grown ass men can't do.

Educated, as seen with their cousins about the bill of rights and the older kid got accepted by all the best colleges in america.

Survival skills.

Happy, they eat, learn and sing together.

Cons:

Socially awkward, as seen with the older kid's first kiss and stealing from the mall. They father never taught them how to live in society.

Does not keep safety in mind, the girl almost paralyze, the boy claiming the mountain breaking his hand.

In conclusion, he's a good a dad as any and better than most, but no one is perfect and we all have our flaws. I wish my dad had taught me half the things Ben did with his children.

reply

A parent doesn't teach their kids how to act/behave in society. You learn that on your own over time.

reply

> A parent doesn't teach their kids how to act/behave in society. You learn that on your own over time.

But not if your parent keeps you totally away from society so you do not get socialized or gain enough information to know how to interact with others.

reply

Ultimately, yes. Does he love his children and have good intentions, yes. Was he preparing his children to live in the world, no. It's great that they have survival skills, but they can learn that on weekends. All that philosophy doesn't do any good if the kids don't know how to interact with other people. He was also not allowing them freedom to choose, because he was not allowing them to know all the options available. What makes him a great father in the end is he listened to his kids, and made adjustments to give them all they needed. Most people wouldn't compromise their beliefs like he did.

reply

The other thing I think "Ben" supporters sort of take for granted is that
Ben is a fully-formed, functioning, human being .... without flaws from his
own parents and life experiences, but clearly that is not the case.

The vast majority of people seem to have this idea that they instinctively
know how to be great parents, or parent well enough, but that is not true,
and even less true as our society progresses, or should I say gets more
complicated.

Everything Ben did was kind of a reaction to his insults society had inflicted
on him, and he made his children's lives all about that. I can't argue too
much with Ben's critiques of modern life, but what can one person do about
it? You simply cannot find unknown land and found your own garden of
eden using your children to work our your own problems.

reply

I kind of agree. These parents went all out in their rebellion against the society, though they did teach their kids various social and educational bits.

All in all, they were akin to Amish - secluded from society and technology, though unlike Amish, they did learn science, history, politics - as well as the reasons why religions are all bull. Amish learn farming skills, whereas this family learned hunting and wild life survival skills (I'd argue that Amish have the upper hand here, since there is a good reason why humanity switched from wild hunt to farming - there is a lot more stability and much better odds of survival in that form of food attainment).

Now, if they had similar numbers to Amish, one could argue that there is no particular harm in forming that sort of society. However, their numbers are small, which means that interacting with 'normal' people would become necessary later on in life if they wished to procreate (incest has major downsides).

reply

Ok, not a parent I take it? A parent very much needs to teach their child how to behave in society. Without teaching a child what is correct behavior the world would be full of bratty, self-entitled little windbags. Oh wait, that's already happening. In the last hmm 10 years you can't watch the news or get online w/out hearing about some kid, actual child physically hurting someone, bullying, stealing, killing. Pregnancy as early as 13 - 14 because they think it's cool. All because parents are NOT teaching their children proper behavior.

reply

[deleted]

imo yes. I'd much rather be around people like his kids than the two douchey cousins. The two douchey cousins are basically the default American kids.

He was misguided about the stealing, which I don't morally agree with unless you're broke and starving. Then again, I take a much bigger issue with the global banks committing fraud out in the open, since the damage done by that is at least a trillion times bigger than shoplifting, so I think prioritizing is a good thing.

The rock climbing, I don't know enough about to make a judgment. The youngest boy might have been a stretch, but the rest that he took out were already young adults. You could judge that he was forcing them to do it, but do you judge everything else kids are forced to do in the real world? I, for one, would have much rather been taken rock climbing than forced to go into the government daycare centers, the intellectual vacuums full of douchey morons that are US schools.

The knives were maybe a bit much for an 8 year old girl, but then again, who knows. Maybe it's bad, but giving kids high fructose corn syrup might be just as bad, or worse. There's no such thing as perfection. Since the dawn of humans, humans have been imperfect. But, if we're going to decide what are the optimum child rearing conditions in binary terms, then it should be decided around the best scientific data we can muster, not emotional reactions.

Why can't you be a non-conformist like everyone else?

reply

Yes.




“Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance."

reply

I think he is a good father, but he was just too extreme in his beliefs, the same way conservatives can be too extreme in theirs. I am a liberal and we don't attend church, but we still teach our son how to survive without wifi and video games. We garden, we can our veggies, we own guns and knives, we even make our own wine. To me it is important to find a balance. You get them for 18 years and you hope you will have taught them when they leave that they can be prepared for any situation. Sure they were prepared to live solely on land, but seeing his son being awkward with the girl at the campground is why social skills are also needed.

I don't think you can ever live completely off the grid in an industrialized lawful nation. I think in order for that to work you have to be completely isolated. If you research the North Sentinelise islanders, they have rejected anything but hunting and gathering, and they will kill you if you get anywhere near them and shoot arrows at helicopters and planes flying over the island. They have their own law and order that can not be penetrated by outsiders.

reply

I love that you know the tale of the Sentinel Island People. That is just a fascinating bit of anthropology right there.

Love how they entered the iron age by scavenging wrecked ships lol.

reply

I don't see anything wrong with giving his kids hunting knives if he's educated them all on how to use them. Children can be more capable than we give them credit these days. History should demonstrate that.

Taking them rock climbing is harmless as well in my opinion. Accidents can happen, sure, but they can happen anywhere, even walking down the street. What bothered me about the rock climbing scene was the lack of safety, no radios, no backup lines, no safety nets, no easy, quick and safe way down. Had those parameters been met, I wouldn't object to it for even the smallest children. The older children though, if they're experienced, why not? People take their children rock climbing even now and without much safety.

Theft is obviously wrong. And the attempted breaking and entering was wrong.

He had good aspects and bad aspects. At the end, he merged the best of both worlds so that they can grow healthy and fit in.

The cold winds are rising. Winter is coming.

reply

Exactly! Look at Joan of Arc. She led an army as a young teen.

reply

At the end, he merged the best of both worlds so that they can grow healthy and fit in.

They were still stealing in the end though, weren't they?

reply

American kids are given guns as birthday gift and some people like the OP have a problem with giving a knife to a kid? 😄

reply

This is a very good question

reply