Thor became a joke.


Ragnarok has a lot of humor, more than some comedies, and it some of it is funny but Thor is the punchline of most jokes. So Marvel made Thor into a joke. Smooth move Marvel, lets see how that plays out in the long run.

reply

No, they just made him funny. I would even argue Ragnarok made him stronger by taking away his hammer, allowing his natural abilities to come to the surface. The only way he'd become a joke is if they joked about his abilities. They didn't. Ragnarok took them seriously, and even got closer to the heart of what makes Thor a superhero and not just a guy with a hammer.

reply

There is a difference between making people laugh and being laughed at. He or Loki were the butt of almost every joke. That isn't being funny. And Thor got his ass kicked by every woman in the movie, it's an obvious agenda to diminish the main male characters.

reply

I'll have to disagree with that. Hela was stronger because she's supposed to be the Goddess of Death, not because she's a woman. It makes sense that a Valkyrie is stronger than Loki since Loki relies on his tricks to win his battles. I only recall three women in the movie, with only Hela fighting Thor hand to hand, the Valkyrie using the same electronic device to subdue Thor that the Grandmaster used, and the Grandmaster's henchwoman who died in her craft without ever fighting any of them hand to hand.

All they did was turn a Thor movie into a buddy duo movie of Thor and Banner riffing off each other. Sometimes the jokes were at Thor's expense. Sometimes they were at Banner's expense. And almost always they were at Loki's expense because he's Loki.

reply

But it doesn't make sense for a fallen Valkerie to be stronger than Thor. Also Loki was stronger in previous movies.

reply

I don't remember it showing her stronger than Thor. He was strong enough to beat Hulk and held his own against Hela. Valkyrie wasn't anywhere near that strong. In that short period between losing his hammer and learning his potential, maybe she was stronger, but the movie always shows her zapping him. I would argue she was his equal at best during that short period, but once he powers up to "god of thunder" she becomes heavily outmatched. They weren't enemies so we really never got to see it.

Loki in the MCU is a frost giant, not a real Asgardian, though he probably has the durability of one. There's nothing suggesting this version of Loki is stronger than a battle-tested Valkyrie who is thousands of years old.

reply

Valkyrie wasn't stronger. She did beat Thor, but that was because she had the advantage of superior technology, and caught him unarmed, dazed, and at his most vulnerable moment. Because come on, if that fight had been hand-to-hand he wouldn't even have had to knock her over, because she was so drunk she could barely stand up! All he'd have had to do was stand there and wait for her to fall over! You can't beat that for a cinematic low point, being captured by someone who's that... hammered.

And Loki was never stronger, he was just smarter. But then, who isn't.

reply

Oh please, Thor has always been slightly ridiculous, and that goes back to the comics.

So this movie took qualities in the character that have always been there and played them up, and the result was my favorite movie of the year so far.

reply

I disagree. There is a climate of hate and bitterness toward men, especially white men, and this movie played into it to assuage feminist bigotry. Don't believe me, go read America Ferrera's IG.

reply

Obviously there's no pleasing some people. If you're going to look at a light-hearted hilarious movie and see nothing but reasons to feed your bitterness, then there's no hope for you.

Especially since you seem to have missed the fact that the movie showed the white straight male hero triumphant at the finale. Because yes, remember that after all the silliness and dopiness and fights and weirdness, at the end of the film Hela is defeated because of THor's cleverness, and the nation of Asgard including Loki and Valkyrie are standing respectfully by their new king, and the audience including me is cheering the white male hero who has triumphed over all challenges? Remember that? No, I guess not.

reply

This is a movie for those easily pleased.

reply

Life is more fun if you're easily pleased!

reply

Sounds like you're the one with an agenda.

reply

Why is that?

Edit, chirp, chirp.

reply

Because you have no taste and must scream. On the ignore list with you!

reply

Bwahaha, just saw End Game where Thor is nothing but comic relief. Dude Thor.

reply

You say "comic" like it's a bad thing!

I thought he was fucking brilliant. Such acting gifts as Chris Hemsworth possesses are in comedy, and he used comedy to show how badly Thor's heart had been broken by his failure to save the universe.

Which would be totally lost on those with no sense of humor, of course.

reply

He has great comedic timing. He was the only good thing about Girlbusters.

reply

Yes, he absolutely stole the movie from the four female leads - he is indeed the male Annie Potts!

I love him but I don't think he's a great actor, but he has a real gift for comedy. It's really too bad that Hollywood has lost the art of making good Romcoms, because that's the sort of film that needs lead actors who are both hot and possessed of good comedic timing. Outside that genre, there just aren't that many good roles for a really hot guy who's funny.

reply

No, he lacks range for sure. I'd love seing him in a 48 Hourse type of deal though.

If you ask me, romcoms is to love what porn is to sex. And while I kinda hate the genre, those with Hugh Grant tends to be good.

To be honest, I don't think I've seen Hemsworth outside the MCU except for Girlbusters. But I really enjoy his Funny Thor. Most of the time. The goodbye from the Asguardians of The Galaxy was really cringy, and in all honesty - I'm getting sick of Chris Pratt. Loved him in Parks and Rec, and MCU up till GoTG 2. And don't get me started on the Jurassic Park films. But I digress.

I haven't read a Thor comic since the early 80's, but I remember him being a funny guy, much like the opening scene of Ragnarok. For him, that's just a day at the office. And I know I mess around a bit when I know I'll ace my task and make it look easy to boot.

reply

For some reason, tons of good Romcoms were made in the 1990s, some of the best starred Sandra Bullock or Hugh Grant, and are and were great fun. Somehow the genre died in the new millennium, I don't know why but I suspect it was Kate Husdon's fault. Which is too bad for Hemsworth, the genre would be a natural fit for him.

And no, I haven't read the Thor comics but I've seen bits here and there on the internet, and they do seem to have a deadpan humor. I mean, they turned Thor into a frog, right? And that's the thing about Hemsworth's Thor in the Avengers movies, he's used deadpan and absurd humor since the beginning of his run, and IMHO that's why Hemsworth was perfectly cast - how many huge blond studly guys have such good comic timing? Seriously, whatever the Marvel Films casting people have been paid, it's not enough. They've cast almost all of the major roles to perfection!

reply

Oh for sure. They even found someone who is a good Peter Parker and a good Spidey. Tobey was a great Parker and Garfield was a great Spidey.

You see, both Bullock and Grant can act. And that's like, really important for romcoms.

Yeah, they sure did. And that's just the start of it.

I think Thor, the character in MCU, found that us Earthlings thought he was funny, and being the people person he actually is, he started being funnier. And him being the butt of many jokes, and "that's not how he used to be!". In Thor 1, if he's not the butt of a ton of jokes, he's the punchline. "I need a horse!". I may childish, but I thougt that was funny as hell. But I don't beleive for a second that he enjoyed the poor American excuse for coffee.

Oh for sure, all of the major characters are perfectly casted. It turned out so so good.

reply

Wtf? America Ferrera? who is she and what does she have to with Thor for Christ's sake? You sound like a psycho trying to compare a random person to this movie.

reply

I think it made him weak by how many people could just immobilize him and drag him around as if he were nothing.

That mob is scummy trash people who called him food....all it took was some electro net and use was 100% defeated.
That drunk Valkyrie, just toss some ring chip that sticks to him and he is 100% defeated and endlessly zapped and carried around by everyone as if he were a child.

As I said in another thread, all they needed was the supply of zapper chips Valkyrie keeps on her ship and they could've EASILY taken out Hela and then Thanos. Hell just toss 50 of those zapper chips on Thanos (however many you need) and he's a joke. He's no threat at all. All those endless battles with Thanos....all they needed were Valkyrie's metal chips and they'd EASILY take him out.

To me that makes him pretty weak.

reply

Thor is a Norse god, not just some ordinary 'superhero'

reply

The whole movie is a bad joke from start to finish.

On my personal list is absolute garbage and the worst MCU movie so far, even worse than IM3. This movie is the epitome of squandered potential and I'll never ever watch a Waititi movie again.

reply

I completely agree. It’s even worse considering the major events of the movie— the death of Odin the Allfather and the destruction of Asgard, the Realm Eternal. It’s impossible to take either of these momentous events seriously in the context of this movie.

reply

The one thing they did that pissed me off was how unceremoniously they dispatched the Warriors Three.

I know it was part of the "out with the old, in with the new" spring-cleaning ethos, but every other 'legacy' aspect of the previous movies was treated with at least a modicum of care and respect.

I think it's fair to assume that ironclad contractual obligations were the only thing that kept Stevenson, Levi and maybe even Asano from peacing out before production began.

reply

Agree with this. I loved the Warriors 3 and Sif. I didn't like how they were so quickly killed off and they deserved better. Glad to see Sif in 'Loki' but it didn't make it better for me.

reply

Agreed! 👍🏿

reply

So Marvel made Thor into a joke. Smooth move Marvel, lets see how that plays out in the long run.

^^

Thor 3 drastically Increases in box office over Thor 2 grossing 850 Million(A Franchise High)....

Thor 3 gets Universally Praise from critics and audiences, By far The best ratings and reviews of the series...

Avengers IW Drastically Increases in Box office over Age Of Ultron grossing 2 Billion dollars With Thor having A Huge Role

All in All I dont think we need to wait for the long run....Its worked out great and seems to ONLY be getting better....


its perfectly fine if you dont like the direction Marvel Studios took with Thor...you are right they clearly wanted to take the character in a more humorous direction....

If you dont like it fine, But its clear The Overwhelming Majority doesnt agree with you...all data suggests audiences around the world LOVE Thor more than ever now.

just be ok with your own opinion, You dont need to delusionally say "Ya lets see how that works out in the long run"....You dont need validation for your opinion....

If you dont like The direction Marvel Studios took with Thor, fine, But you dont need "Thor to go on a downward trajectory" to validate that....

Instead....I think your actually angry...I think you know Most dont agree with you, I think you have to be able to see, The reactions and results to The new direction of Thor is Overwhelmingly positive and Lucrative...

I think your only saying "lets see how that plays out in the long run." because Your mad Thor is having Its highest success with This new direction YOU DONT LIKE...


PS....

I dont think there is actually going to be a "Long Run" as Hemsworth Contact is up after Avengers 4......Hemsworth is on record as ready to stop playing the role as The Work out routine to play the role are not fun anymore and way too much...



bottom line...Unfortunately....It seems your just going to have to find a way to accept and live with that fact....Thor is never going to have the downward Trajectory like you want and Hope...

first because Its clear The overwhelming majority doesnt share your opinion and instead loves the new direction of Thor and 2nd because There just arent going to be anymore Thor films...

at the end of the day...I'm sorry,Thor had his greatest success with the new direction YOU DONT LIKE....I'm sure that bothers you but theres nothing you can ever do about it

Or you can get real desperate and PULL the ultimate "Butthurt" move and start claiming "everyone is wrong and your right"....start claiming who cares that the majority liked Thor 3, People are stupid....

But you kinda killed that excuse by stating in the post "lets see how it works out for you in the long run"...that kills the Desperate "I dont care what anyone/Majority says" excuse as your statement specifcally depends on The Majority turning on Thor's new direction...If you didnt care what the majority said you would have never made a comment/prediction that The new direction is going hurt Thor in the long run obviously hinting/suggesting the majority of people are going to dislike it

so ya, this clearly wasnt a well thought through thread by you....





reply

Get back to me if you come up with something better than buh, buh, buh, box office!!

reply

You want answers beyond the box office? Okay...

I'm a fan of the first two Thor flicks, but this one is the best. It has the most compelling plot, the most interesting guest stars, and adds a little more humor to the proceedings while keeping a nice balance between the amusing parts and the serious ones. Some parts are even moving, like The Executioner's story arc, whilst some are profound, e.g. Odin's revelation about Asgard. Much of the humor is laugh-out-loud funny.

Blanchett is utterly badaxx -- even hot -- as the villainess and, believe it or not, this is the best depiction of the Hulk yet on the screen. He has more dialogue here than in his four previous appearances on the big screen combined (i.e. "Hulk," "The Incredible Hulk," "Avengers" and "Avengers: Age of Ultron"). In addition, the guest appearance by Dr. Strange is exceptional.

Like "Captain America: Civil War" (2016), Marvel just knocked it out of the ballpark with this one.

reply

That guy is a total sperg.

reply

The whole movie was essentially a joke. It was impossible to take anything seriously.

reply

It's a comedy.

reply

Considering how much better Ragnarok did compared to the first two installments, I don't think theyre fretting about it.

reply

Long run seems to be lost on people.

reply

No, i undersrand what in the long run means. It'll turn out better in the long run than it would've if they kept on the same path as the first two installments. Depending on contract stuff, Chris Hemsworth as Thor won't be around much longer in the MCU

reply

Yep, this cringe comedy movie made a joke of Thor.

reply

I liked Ragnarok, but throughout the Marvel movies Thor has been made into a joke. He is an all powerful god, he could just kill anyone and everyone really

reply