The R-rating from the MPAA is SEXIST against women

Its ridiculous that the MPAA/CARA recently gave the film "Ma Ma" an R-rating "for some nudity and sexual references". It only shows female NON-GENITAL NUDITY IN A NON-SEXUAL CONTEXT (breast exams mostly). You can bet if it was MALE non-genital nudity (buttocks) shown just as frequently in a non-sexual context, the film would have been passed with a PG-13 rating. If a man was shown topless instead, it could be given a G-rating, if there was no language or sexual context.

The one sex scene was very discreet and only had implied sexuality and showed nothing. There was no violence in the film. The language was the kind typically passed with a PG-13 rating. So they gave this film an R-rating, the HIGHEST functional rating that the MPAA uses, based merely on female NON-GENITAL nudity in a non-sexual context! That's totally ridiculous and discriminatory! Especially when the same motherfockers at the MPAA passed "Central Intelligence", which shows several scenes of male non-genital nudity (men's buttocks), with a PG-13 rating! Why do they allow male non-genital nudity to be passed with a PG-13 rating, but female non-genital nudity is slapped with an R-rating, even in a non-sexual context?

What about the "free the nipple" campaign?. What about women's push to be topless in public just like men? Its complete sexual oppression of the female body. The film makers should have APPEALED THIS RATING, and if that didn't work, then they should SUE THE MPAA FOR HAVING A SEXIST RATING POLICY. The R-rating limits the film's reach and audience, and will cost the film makers millions of dollars in lost revenue, and its especially offensive when the MPAA passes films that show similar amounts of male non-genital nudity with a PG-13 rating. The producers should SUE THE MPAA FOR DAMAGES based on the lost revenues of the film caused by the unfairly higher R-rating.