Couldn't they get actual teenagers, instead of girls who looked 20-30?
The one seriously looked 30. Would it have been so hard to get real teen actresses?
shareDon't think they would have had actual teenage girls gagged and tied to a bed getting raped, stripping on stage, or taking off her panties and sitting on a dude's face. They had to be of age.
Jesus would support Universal Health Care
That's true. But even if the actresses they got were not teens, they still looked older. Like if you watch Taken for example, the kidnapped daughter in that movie looked more like a teen, than these girls, and The Amazing Spider-man, the actor they got to play Peter Parker, looked like a teen even though he was in his late 20s.
It's okay to get actresses who are of age, but couldn't they at least get ones that looked like high school girls? One of them literally looked older than me, and I am 29.
If you're talking about serious movies, I totally agree. But in a sexploitation movie like this I actually PREFER the girls look older. I like sexy 20-30 year old girls in school uniforms with skirts so short and panty-baring that they'd probably get any real schoolgirl expelled (and big, fully developed adult breasts are a plus too). This movie would be a little too creepy and ephebophilic if they looked too much like ACTUAL teenage schoolgirls.
shareWhy did it have to be a sexploitation movie though? Sexploitation movies are okay, if they have more lighthearted stories, but this one is about teenagers wanting to avenge being raped. It seemed to me that the filmmakers should have been less exploitative about it, and put more depth into the material.
For example, why do the rape victims all have to be hot? If watch a movie like Deliverance (1972), for example, the guys are not hot male models that show off their skin in several close up shots. They were portrayed as is, for a drama about rape. So why couldn't they just do the same here?
If they made a more hard hitting drama, it probably would have scored points with bigger audiences.