MovieChat Forums > Timbuktu (2014) Discussion > Review of the film from Cannes by The Gu...

Review of the film from Cannes by The Guardian


Abderrahmane Sissako's passionate and visually beautiful film Timbuktu is a cry from the heart – with all the more moral authority for being expressed with such grace and such care. It is a portrait of the country of his childhood, the west African state of Mali, and in particular the city of Timbuktu, whose rich and humane traditions are being trampled, as Sissako sees it, by fanatical jihadis, often from outside the country. The story revolves around the death of a cow, affectionately named "GPS" – an appropriate symbol for a country that has lost its way.

These Islamist zealots are banning innocent pleasures such as music and football, and throwing themselves with cold relish into lashings and stonings for adultery. The new puritans appall the local Imam, who has long upheld the existing traditions of a benevolent and tolerant Islam; they march into the mosque carrying arms. Besides being addicted to cruelty and bullying, these men are enslaved to their modern devices – mobile phones, cars, video-cameras (for uploading jihadi videos to the internet) and, of course, weapons. Timbuktu is no longer tombouctou la mysterieuse, the magical place of legend, but a harsh, grim, unforgiving place of bigotry and fear.

Sissako creates an interrelated series of characters and tableaux giving us scenes from the life of a traumatised nation, historically torn apart and prone to failures in communication between its three languages: Touareg, Arabic and French. At the centre of this is the tragic story of one family: a herdsman Kidane (Ibrahim Ahmed), his wife Satima (Toulou Kiki) and their 12-year-old daughter. Kidane angrily confronts a fisherman who has killed his cow, with tragic results. Mali's new theocratic state must now rule on something that has nothing to do with infringements of its own proliferating religious laws – and its crass insensitivity and immaturity as a system of government is horribly exposed.

There are some brilliant visual moments: the panoramic vision of the river in which Kidane and the fisherman stagger apart, at different ends of the screen, is superb, composed with a panache that David Lean might have admired. When a jihadi comes close to admitting he is infatuated with Satima, Sissako shows us the undulating dunes with a strategically placed patch of scrub. It is a sudden, Freudian vision of a woman's naked body, which is then made the subject of a bizarre, misogynist attack.

Elsewhere, young men carry on playing football after football has been banned by miming the game. They rush around the field with an invisible football, earnestly playing a match by imagining where the ball should be. It is a funny, sly, heartbreaking scene, reminiscent of anti-Soviet satire. In another scene, a young man is being coached on how to describe his religious conversion for a video (for an awful moment, it looks as if it might be a suicide-bomber "martyrdom" video). The boy talks about how he used to love rap music, but no longer. Yet in the face of the hectoring and maladroit direction, the boy lowers his head: he finds he cannot mouth these dogmatic platitudes.

In many ways, Sissako's portrait of Mali is comparable to Ibrahim El-Batout's portrait of Egypt and the Tahrir Square protests in his film Winter of Discontent. It is built up with enormous emotion, teetering between hope and despair.

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/may/14/cannes-film-festival-revie w-timbuktu
I give my respect to those who have earned it; to everyone else, I'm civil.

reply

historically torn apart and prone to failures in communication between its three languages: Touareg, Arabic and French.


Facepalm. Touareg is not a language, they probably mean Tamasheq. And Mali's prime language is Bambara. To which you can add at least a dozen of other local languages, all spoken much more widely than Arabic! Pulaar, Xhasonké, Soninké, Malinké, Songhrai, etc etc.

It's a nice review overall, but like many other western reviews about this movie, it shines by its obvious ignorance of Malian history and geography. Some don't even seem to realise that the movie is based on real life stories and on the Malian civil war. When did journalists get so lazy you have to wonder.

reply

With regards the incorrect languages named in the review you have a point, assuming that the languages in the film are not listed as Touraeg, Arabic and French. (I've not had the pleasure of seeing the film yet.)

This review implicitly indicates awareness that the film is based on the recent conflicts in Northern Mali. I can't speak for other reviewers since I don't read that many. As to ignorance of history by film critics; well, how long does the critic have to prepare their review? Would the information they need be available at the click of a few buttons on the internet? The latter Q may seem evidently yes but from what I've read of the internet and search engines I think the answer is possibly, at best. Also whose information and facts would be available to inform the film critic and would those satisfy other viewers who read the review?

I think film critics are best sticking to reviewing the film as it presents including what information, facts and opinion are available from within the film. If they have time after before posting a review then it is appropriate, if they care, to discover more about the context of the film maker, the traditions within which s/he operates and relevant history.

Journalism has been infected by that which besets all - technology and social media. Perhaps the better Q is when did we all get so lazy about what is presented to us? When did we stop digging behind the image?

A bird sings and the mountain's silence deepens.

reply