SRK shouldn't have...
... died. I feel he should have continued to live happily ever after. This Im saying, NOT because I'm an SRK fan. Bit because, probably in doing so, the film would have have taken form of an anti-political propaganda(which I support).
Ive stayed in Gujarat for a long time and have come across more Gujaratis who consume liquor than those who do not touch it. Im a non-Gujarati and an anti-national. But I believe as much as corruption should not be condoned, neither should oppressive regimes be tolerated in equal measure and SRK surviving in the end to tie up the loose ends comprehensively, would have proved exactly that point. Unfortunately that was not to be and will be vested in some other director to bring out the issue someday(hopefully soon).
Currently living in Bengal, I love the fact that there is perhaps more freedom enjoyed here than in any other state barring perhaps some of the north-east states(liquor, meat of 'all' kinds...you name it). However, seeing as I do the country turning non-secular and oppressive, how much longer would perhaps be a valid argument.