A black on orient express???


and a doctor at that???
Seriously?
Why holywood pushes the black race everywhere?
Why they didn't add an indian and a chinese?

reply

[deleted]

Yes, for a timepiece of this era it would seem like an odd choice, but the story redeems him and his race quit well

reply

Get over it.

reply

Are you really suprised about that in 2018? Personally, I just find it funny by now. It deserves to be made fun of, but that's just how it is. You'll only see more of this in the future when white supremacy is finally smashed in all western countries. Eventually there'll be nobody to laugh at it anymore, but hey, at least you guys can go out with a good laugh ;-)

reply

When White demographic dominance is over, there will be no laughter. Rather things will turn to shit. Just look at how Detroit and East LA look right now.

reply

Political/social pressure to have blacks in Hollywood movies, nothing more. A Turk, Indian or a Chinese would be far more likely. Just another example of how political correctness is destroying popular culture, but it's not the worst. Some movies now have black kings and nobles in European middle ages. Horrible

reply

Yeah, I wonder why they always go with black when another race would seem more likely. So was slavery and oppression of black people a thing or wasn't it??? They can't seem to make up their minds!

reply

A black guy on a train? What will they think of next?!

reply

A black guy on a plane, of course! With snakes!!

reply

Who cares if they didn't have Indian and Chinese?

OH NO! A black person on a train? Who's a doctor? Whatever will we do?

reply

Cause they are stupid. Under no circumstandes a black person would have been in that time period on such a luxury train in europe.

But its all about politics instead of movies. And thats why a black person is on the Orient Express of the 30s. Beside that any moviegoer knows that its more likely that E. T. would have been part of the passenger list at that time at that train.

And I even try to get some thought into the usual SJW brain (i know that its pointless, cause no SJW got a working brain, but Im willing to be surprised): Think for a second about an 80s ghetto movie played .... only by whites. Such a stupid move that is.

And BTW Thos time were when racism were still part of society. And there is no defense that black people were treatd like they were treated back then. But its simply stupid to ignore thos facts and therefor steal us the possibility to learn about thos problems. Hiding past racism means that we cant learn from that mistakes (like the stupid move to hide the southern state flag. As if this would undo the thousands of humans killed in the south). Even thinking humen knows that. But, as I said, SJW never got working brains. And thats why they are a huge problem for society.

reply

Famous black doctor from that time period, as an example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivien_Thomas

"Under no circumstandes a black person would have been in that time period on such a luxury train in europe."

Do you know that for a fact? I suspect you're applying American racism to all of Europe.

Here: https://www.npr.org/2013/09/02/218074523/paris-has-been-a-haven-for-african-americans-escaping-racism

"But, as I said, SJW never got working brains. And thats why they are a huge problem for society."

Such bland trolling.

reply

When had I mentioned that there wouldnt be a black doctor?

I mentioned that "at that time period at the train". So the europeans werent as racists as the americans :) ? Then take a look at the support for fascists in France, Italy, Austria, Germany, Hungary, etc. . The americans were way less racists then theeuropeans (at least according to their political behaviour).

And Berlin was a living and breathing city like Paris. Until the end of the 1920s when the Nazis came. And neither the Paris nor the Berlin city live would change anything aobut a black person not being on the most luxury train of the world of that time.

And SJWs are only there to worsen a situation. They never made any progress to society. Thats what I define as "not working brain". As with any other fascist.

reply

Well I've seen you troll enough times on these boards (in fact probably every post I've seen of yours), so it's not surprising to see you complaining about black people.

Another triggered white snowflake who can't stand the sight of dark skin, that's you.

reply

Indeed, my little SJW. As brilliant and well thought as all your other "postings" :) .

BTW Under no circumstances read my other postings on this thread. Theirs always the danger to become smart. And we both want to avoid that at any case :) .

reply

Yeah but either way SJWs are stupid

reply

A surgical technician, not a medical doctor, who, according to the article, made as much money as a janitor in the mid 30s. Unless he was a popular entertainer or an African diplomat, I don't see him making a trip on a luxury train either.

reply

There were plenty of people that weren't racist back then. Racism has always been around, and it's still around now. Besides, he was able to get on the train because it was all part of the murder plan. Everyone on the train had some kind of connection with Edward Ratchett.

reply

Indeed there are still racists today and there were back then people which werent racists (like Mark Twain with his awesome and progressive novel "Huckleberry Finn" - which is now destroyed by SJWs. Fascists always had progressive people :) ).

"The character of Colonel Arbuthnot is combined with Dr. Constantine to create Dr. Arbuthnot, a sniper who served under Colonel Armstrong in the war and had his medical school paid for by Armstrong"

Neither of thos two were black. So we have a clear case of "blackening" here. Which is as racist as "whitening". But beside that .... it shows that there was no reason at all beside an political agenda to include Dr. Arbuthnot into the movie. Which was simply racist and stupid (cause of the historic circumstances).

reply

I don't care if someone is white, black, yellow, purple, whatever skin color in a movie. As long as they do a good job playing the role, I'm fine with it. Who says what skin color that particular character has to be? Unless the book describes what the particular character looks like, it shouldn't matter what the actor/actress that plays the character looks like. The only thing that's annoying me is that people are acting like this is a new thing. If you look at the Much Ado About Nothing version from the 90s, there is a black actor that plays the role of the prince, in a period piece, and that story takes place a very long time ago, hundreds of years ago. Shakesphere probably had a white character in mind, although who knows for sure, but Denzel Washington played the role just fine and since his character's features weren't described, it is fine that any person of any skin color could play that role.

And honestly, even if that particular person is supposed to look like someone, for example blonde hair, blue eyes, and pale skin, I'm sure most people would prefer a white person with blond hair and blue eyes play that character, and I would prefer that too. But if someone that doesn't look like that and plays the character, it's not gonna bother or offend me, as long as they play the character correctly. It wouldn't bother me if a white character played a black character, or a black character played a white character, or a yellow person played a blue person, unless that character is supposed to look like someone in particular.

And I agree with you on Huckleberry Finn, that book should not be banned in schools

(Sorry for the long paragraphs)

reply

I never gave a sh*t about the skin color of an actor. Beverly Hills Cop was as funny and awesome to me as Die Hard. And I still think that 48 Hrs did way more to fight racism as this stupid in your face desaster called Zootopia did (and they are really comparable, cause at appr. the first half I thought "Wow, Disney did 48 Hrs as an rendered cartoon and they are doing it good!". And then, at the second half, the Disney mind police took over and destroyed that movie completely. It is today one of the worst Disney movies ever).

But .... now there are idiotic terms like "whitening" and people are mainly casted cause they are from China, female and/or black (a black, chinese female could make so much money in todays Hollywood :) ). And thats as sexist and racist as possible. Cause it reduces thos awesome actors to a quota object. But they start to realize that (that this new antiliberal politics from SJWs destroy feminism and antiracism) and start to attack it. YouTube a few months ago had the braindead idea to post a message that stated "We like to see more clips done by black people!". And one according reaction of an black YouTubee with lots of subscribers was "Are you stupid? People like me because im a creative and not cause of my skin color!". And this SJW racism and antifemitism (there were even a SJW posting which stated that gender gap doesnt exist, cause .... you wont believe this .... sex is just contructed and therefor there cant be such a gap! :) ) has to be stopped. And thats why this black person on the Orient Express is a problem. Cause he is there cause of racist politics and not cause he did an awesome job (which noone beside Michelle Pfeifer did at that movie ;) ).

reply

Everyone on the train had some kind of connection with Edward Ratchett.

Very good point.

reply