MovieChat Forums > Roots (2016) Discussion > OT: 87% of White women want to have sex ...

OT: 87% of White women want to have sex with Black men, according to....


87% of White women want to have sex with Black men, according to new study.

White woman with Black men

A study from Rutgers University in New Rochelle, NJ, has concluded that approximately 87 percent of American White women have had or fantasize about having sexual relations with African American males. The study was conducted by the Sexual Sociological Endowment in the Cultural Histology department, at Rutgers University.

The study reveals that a whopping 87% of white women dream of having sex with a Black man and in some cases many already have. Interestingly enough, the same study says only 13% of white women said they would marry and raise a family with a Black man. Of the 800 involved in the study, 8 percent said they have actually dreamed of having a threesome with Black men.
The study reveals that a whopping 87% of white women dream of having sex with a Black man and in some cases many already have. Interestingly enough, the same study says only 13% of white women said they would marry and raise a family with a Black man. Of the 800 involved in the study, 8 percent said they have actually dreamed of having a threesome with Black men.

The fact that there is such a huge disparity between the number of white women who want to have sex with Black men versus those who would marry Black men, shows that many still have stereotypical view of Black men. Black men are seen as sexual masters in the bedroom but almost complete absent from the corporate boardroom.
So when it comes to sex, most white women would prefer a Black man but they look toward their own white men when they are looking for a provider.

reply

You hardly ever see white men with black women. I am all for equality but the races shouldn't mix. I'm tired of seeing all these trash white girls with black guys. Makes me think bad of them.

reply

Fake study, written by someone with the IQ of a lima bean.

1. Rudgers university is in New Brunswick, not Rochelle.

2. There is no "Sexual Sociological Endowment in the Cultural Histology" department.

3. There's no "Cultural Histology". Histology is the study of microscopic anatomy of cells and tissues in plants and animals.

4. The original source for this "study" is a reggae website.

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/race-attraction-2009-2014/

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-race-affects-whether-people-write-you-back/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjSh_esW9W4

Study by Harvard.

For those who state a preference, both white males and females are the least open to interracial dating within their genders– 29 percent of white males and 65 percent of white females prefer to date only whites, finding that is consistent with social exchange and group position perspectives asserting
that whites have far less to gain than minorities in interracial relationships. In contrast, Latinos are fairly open to out-dating; only 15 percent of males and 16 percent of females prefer to date only Latinos. Similarly, we find that white women (4%) are less likely than black women (8%), Latinas (16%), and especially, Asian women (40%) toprefer to date only outside of their respective racial group. These findings are even more pronounced after statistical controls are introduced (see Appendix Table
2), demonstrating that dating preferences are highly gendered and racialized in intersecting ways. Gender is a key determinant of openness to interracial dating.
Consistent with sexual strategies theory, we find women are much more likely to state a racial preference than men (74% vs. 58%, pr = .001, not
shown). However, we see that only some groups of women prefer to be more racially homogamous than men. Among those who state a racial preference, more white women
(65%) and black women (45%) prefer to date only within their race.


http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/89/3/807.full.pdf+html

Study by Princeton.

Body type, political views, and religion are also related to the exclusion of blacks or Asians. Among white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large. For white men, body type has no effect on effect on their likelihood of excluding blacks or Asians. While political views also have no effect on racial exclusion by white men, white women who describe themselves as liberal or very liberal are less likely to exclude black men as dates than women who are not political, middle of the road, or conservative. Surprisingly, liberal white women appear more likely to exclude Asian men as dates, although this finding only borders on significance. Finally, religion affects black exclusion, and Asian exclusion among white women. Specifically, we see that whites who identified as Jewish were dropped from the analysis of black exclusion because it was a perfect predictor; that is, all white men and women who identified as Jewish excluded blacks as possible dates; all white women who identified as Jewish also excluded Asian men as possible dates. Further, white men who do not state a religion or who state their religion as “other” are far more inclusive of black women as dates than those who describe themselves as not religious. Likewise, white women of “other” religions are more likely to include Asian males as dates.


http://paa2008.princeton.edu/abstracts/80046

reply

Fake study, written by someone with the IQ of a lima bean.

1. Rudgers university is in New Brunswick, not Rochelle.

2. There is no "Sexual Sociological Endowment in the Cultural Histology" department.

3. There's no "Cultural Histology". Histology is the study of microscopic anatomy of cells and tissues in plants and animals.

4. The original source for this "study" is a reggae website.




I knew that this was some b.s by the wording. For example, when I read the part about white women "dreaming" of having sex with black men. What type of educational study would use that sort of terminology unless the study is literally about the sort of dreaming that comes with sleeping? It sounds too personal and unprofessional. I would expect the words "desire" or even "aspire" but not "dreaming". This was obviously written by a male, likely a black male idiot, who's overly intrigued or fascinated with sex, particularly sex between black men and white women.







I woke up this way...

reply

by huckleberrythin » Sun Jun 19 2016 13:34:55
Fake study, written by someone with the IQ of a lima bean.

1. Rudgers university is in New Brunswick, not Rochelle.

That, and the fact that New Rochelle is in New York, and has three other colleges. You've got the College of New Rochelle, Iona College, and a local campus of Monroe College, which is based in The Bronx.



by I_Luv_Apple » Sun Jun 19 2016 13:33:50
You hardly ever see white men with black women.


Then you're probably not paying that much attention.



Anyway, I'm really surprised G. Hannelius was in this. I still remember her character being played by Sandy Duncan and going on a racial tirade against two little kids blaming them for the devastation of the Civil War.

reply

Why do you say “Study by Harvard” and “Princeton” whereas both studies are by the same scholars, who are from UC Irvine?

Just curious/confused.

Your film gods: Lee Van Cleef and Laura Gemser
http://tinyurl.com/pa4ud44

reply