The President's wife


I was wondering about the wife, who like most other women didnt have kids. She looked of childbearing age. She's totally ok with the lottery system? No sense of entitlement for an embryo as the President's wife. Struck me as a bit odd

Your mom's chest hair!

reply

She looked older than 32

____
It is hard not to sound condescending when you are explaining things to an idiot!

reply

I was wondering about the wife, who like most other women didn't have kids. She looked of childbearing age. She's totally ok with the lottery system? No sense of entitlement for an embryo as the President's wife.
I gather some women really want to experience what it feels like to go through pregnancy, even if the child she brings to term doesn't carry her genes.

However, aren't their other women who only want to go through months of weight gain and hormone surges if the child they bear continues their gene line? If, for the sake of argument, Mrs POTUS is corrupt enough to exploit her closeness to the POTUS to sneak a couple of the 100 embryos, but she is from that second group of women only interested in bearing her own child, she'd leave the embryos alone.

As for the sense of entitlement, some of the dialogue implies the POTUS's Chief of Staff largely owes her position to being a good friend of Mrs POTUS's University days. Kind of ironic when we cast our minds back to the lecture she gave her lover about her struggle to rise entirely on her own merit.

(POTUS == "President Of The United States")

reply

She is still in childbearing age but the lottery has restrictions and from a best chances point of view the older you are the more complications you will have during a pregnancy. That is why the cut off was 32. It should have also started at around age 21 because teens have a slightly higher risk of having a child with birth defects.

____
It is hard not to sound condescending when you are explaining things to an idiot!

reply

But that is when they are the providing the genetic material. Not many teens act as surrogates, in fact most ban women who have not given birth from being surrogates, so there really isn't data on that.

reply

I was wondering about the wife, who like most other women didnt have kids. She looked of childbearing age. She's totally ok with the lottery system? No sense of entitlement for an embryo as the President's wife.
Sunday's episode hinted that you might be right about Mrs POTUS scheming to get a child. Maybe she is befriending the blond Texas wild child because she plans to try to skew the lottery so she gets a child, a child she can't raise because she is a wild child, allowing her friend, MRS POTUS to adopt?

reply

That's my conclusion, also.

'I wear the cheese; the cheese does not wear me.'

reply

So they going to pay the "wild child girl" tons of money so the Pres. wife could get a baby - adopt? I have a feeling IF that happens "wild child girl" does end up getting chosen "wins" a baby (which is what this whole thing is about-- the American people are voting) she will disappear. I think that she would probably die in a "freak accident" after the First Lady "adopts" the child. Otherwise, you know that "wild child girl" may open her mouth about why she has so much money and no baby. I hope I make sense - the show is good, but crazy (I love it though). This whole administration is corrupt, and it seems like the President is oblivious or confused looking all the time; Darius is so freaking evil especially after last night's episode, the lies he told Nathan's father about him being a hero by taking down a few terrorist (what a load of crap) and Nathan's father believes him now AND he wants the President assassinated, so it may work well for the wife (I hope she's NOT in on the assassination of her husband). I don't think she is - she just wants a child.

reply

The required age to be president is 35 so the First Lady is probably older than medically advised to carry a child at this point.

reply

The required age to be president is 35 so the First Lady is probably older than medically advised to carry a child at this point.
I had a friend who had been a very experienced mid-wife, who wanted to be a mother (again), at 39. Its been so long I don't remember how I managed to ask her and still think I was being tactful -- but I asked her about the stats on older moms.

She told me that the really scary stats were for older moms who were first time moms. She told me that the dangers of bearing a disabled child weren't nearly as bad for older moms who had already had other children.

Mind you, we didn't talk about surrogacy. Are the dangers of bearing one's first child at an advanced due to the mom being more vulnerable to problems like gestational diabetes? If it were due solely to the eggs approaching or passing their "best before" date, then why would having born other children at a younger age protect the last child?

Does a mom who had an early pregnancy, that was terminated by an abortion during their first trimester, experience that stats altering protection?

There have been several cases of grannies who agreed to be surrogates for their daughter's embryos, when their daughters couldn't bear a child. If I am not mistaken some of these grandmothers had already gone through menopause, years earlier, and had to undergo hormone therapy so their uterus grew an endometrium again, to accept the daughter's embryo. If the age of the surrogate was a key factor then no responsible doctor would assist wannabe moms whose surrogates were their own 55, 60 or 65 year old moms.

reply

I just looked up the numbers for a 40 year old woman having a baby and they were: 1% chance for down syndrome and 1.58% for all other abnormalities. That means it is more likely that the baby will be fine.

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.

reply