A very questionable 'crime'
One of the key issues one looks at to determine the criminality of something is usually 'what is the harm' or 'what is the mischief that the law is trying to address'.
So, apart from unauthorised access of the MIT servers, I struggle to see the crime.
Let's assume that Aaron intended to republish the articles for free. Does this need to be a crime? Can't it be handled civilly?
Of course, I think they would have had a hard time proving his intention was to republish - which makes it even less a criminal issue.
The whole thing was crazy.
"They who... give up... liberty to obtain... safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."