MovieChat Forums > Soaked in Bleach (2015) Discussion > New shotgun pics are supposed to silence...

New shotgun pics are supposed to silence murder theory?


The only thing the pictures of the shotgun have shown me is that there is no way Kurt would have been able to put that in his mouth and pull the trigger. He was 5'7, right? Gotta love SPD logic.

reply

His licence said 5"11, others say 5"9.

reply

http://youtu.be/KbQ4NqTm-JA

There's also this.

reply

I stand corrected. When I am wrong, I will be the first to admit it. It seems pretty much anyone could have assumed the position with that shotgun. However that does not really change my thinking from before the gun pics were released because that was never a point of contention in the case. In fact murder theorists always assumed he was "helped" into position for the shot because he was dead or close to it. Lack of blood pressure would certainly explain the lack of blood supposedly at the scene.

reply

What do you mean by 'lack of blood' at the scene? Where is the lack of blood mentioned?

reply

In everything I have read by the electrician and others, a small pool of blood by his left ear is mentioned. Even in the new pics released last year you don't really see any splatter. You clearly see his left arm is clean. Hardly conclusive but you would think a 20g shotgun in the mouth would make a much larger mess. I have seen handgun suicides in the mouth and the mess they make also. Much, much larger. It does not make sense.

reply

The reports say 'large drying puddle of blood'. The electrician just says there was blood in his right ear. We don't know if there was splatter or not. We can see there is blood on his t-shirt in one of the photos.

reply

There was very little blood found at the scene. The lack of blood can be viewed in two ways.

1. Head shots where the bullet doesn't exit the skull allegedly produce less bleeding. This is what the people in the suicide camp would argue.

2. Kurt was already dead when he was shot. If his heart had already stopped at the time he was shot then there would have been little blood as it couldn't be pumped out. Of course this would imply that someone else shot him.

reply

"There was very little blood found at the scene" - again, where are you getting this from?

reply

Have you never looked into this case that deep? I guess that explains your position. That information is everywhere UNLESS you read what Courtney has said. She has stated numerous times that he blew his head off. She also claimed (allegedly)the funeral home employees cut out his heart, shaved him bald and danced with his corpse. So something there is amiss.

reply

I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall. Where does it say ANYWHERE that there was very little blood at the scene? It's not a hard question. Can anyone answer it?

reply

Look at a shotgun suicide. Make sure its something you really want to do because you can't unsee it. Not hard to find on the net. Now look at the picture of Kurt that shows his clean left arm. If you don't see the difference between those two pictures I have nothing for you. Very little blood is relative. Very little blood compared to a normal shotgun blast to the mouth. Very much blood compared to a paper cut.

reply

We haven't seen all of the photos. We've only seen snippets. His head wasn't blown off like we see in shotgun suicides/deaths. And like I said before the report stated there was a large pool of drying blood and there was blood on his t-shirt.

reply

No, the new shotgun pics are supposed to prove one of the "facts" presented in this doc is bullsh.t.


If I don't reply, you're most likely on my ignore list

reply

wow, is there really people stupid enough to believe he committed suicide? no wonder evil runs rampant in this world.

reply