Why would he lie? He has nothing to gain whatsoever. His job is a private investigator. I don't think he would lie under any circumstance to make a film for little profit.
He's going up against a well known junkie and manipulative sociopath. I'm choosing to believe the person with the proven track record.
I think he believes that Kurt was murdered but I think that he's wrong and I find the way he has conducted himself to be questionable. The first thing he did when he decided to go public with his theory was go to the media.
He claims he has evidence that Kurt was murdered and yet he has never revealed what it is and states he will only come forward with this evidence once the case is reopened which is counter-productive. If he has evidence then surely the case will be reopened but he is withholding it and the circle goes on.
Now he has been hired by Frances' ex. If he had any ethics or even any empathy he would refuse this association out of respect for Frances.
And what is his 'proven track record'? What do we really know about Tom Grant? He didn't last long as a police officer we know that for sure. To me he comes across as a naive simple man.
The first thing he did when he decided to go public with his theory was go to the media.
Nope. On the 15th of April he contacted Harvey Levin who was a reporter at KCBS News (now the host of TMZ News) and told him if he wanted to see Kurt Cobain's suicide note, he was 'one of the only people who has a copy'. He took Levin to his interview with Cameron, claiming he was a lawyer.
Levin didn't think there was a story so he didn't run it. He clearly believed it was suicide.
[deleted]