Jump scares are cheap!


I remember watching the first movie and noticing how few jump scares there were. Afterwards I did some research and found the director purposefully left them out even after the studio insisted they be put in. I think the idea was to rely on atmosphere and dread rather than cheap scares.

Unfortunately Insidious 3 is filled with cheap jump scares and after a while it just gets annoying. That's not to say the film doesn't have atmosphere – it does. It's just cheapened by jump scares.

Why is it cheap? Because it's not hard to scare people if you constantly raise the volume to 120db. For instance if I was watching a BBC documentary on polar bears, and suddenly the volume went up 200% with high pitched violins, I would jump out of my seat.

My favourite horror movies, perhaps unsurprisingly, are those that don't rely on this cheap tactic. The Ring, for instance, and the Exorcist.

In short, slow build up of dread and horror > high pitched violin at 120db.

reply

[deleted]

Yes, definitely quite a few jump scares. I hate that, but I did like this film.

reply

Jump scares require a lot of sound strategy, the people in charge of sound effects need to consider the reaction time versus the I'm just kidding jump scares are cheap and annoying.

Plot twist for SAW 8 with Tobin Bell?

reply

Liked the movie.
Too many scares.
Agree with you.

Would probably be a 7.1 with better acting and no jumps.

reply

The jump scares were earned. Not false.

reply

Agree 100% I actually came here to write the same thing. A decent horror film virtually ruined by super loud, startling noises every couple of minutes and many of them are irrelevant to what's going on in the movie at that time. Like the old lady waking up out of bed for no reason with a BOOOOM and there is nothing in the room or anything, just an excuse to startle the audience.
It's become a hallmark of bad cinema.

reply