Did it ever dawn on your obviously infinitesimal cerebrum to downvote Chernobyl E01 to 1/10 as opposed to the entire series considering your own admission of merely watching the one episode?
"Don't believe the 9.6 stars this has been given. It must have been rated by trolls or people involved with the show or paid by HBO." ~ Why, because of the overwhelming consensus differs from that of your own? Entitled much...
"The Chernobyl disaster happened 33 years ago in 1986. It was a long time ago. And as terrible as it was its hard to find it all that interesting now. It's the aftermath in the now ghosttown: Pripyat and all the legends that surrounds it that is interesting." ~ Entitlement abounds yet again. FYI, the series was called Chernobyl & go figure, they chose to centre off that title... Crazy i know!
"The acting is mediocre, considering whats it about and the mute colors makes it depressing." ~ The acting was fine & to offset it with the topic suggests you have little understanding of the topic at hand or you'd rather it was overly dramatic - I don't expect you to address, well, any of this, but more so to clarify that statement as it belies understanding. The colours/cinematography/pace etc were obviously deliberate to portray the era & subject matter.
69% of your ratings on IMDb are one star!
It's entitled halfwits such as yourself that skew ratings because you allow your own miserable, self-centred, vapidly vainglorious personalities to poison your viewing experience & that would be fine if it wasn't for the fact that you & your ilk, then feel compelled to regorge your vitriol in the most entitled childish fashion: One-Start tantrums!
Inexorably you are entitled to express your tunnel vision as am I to express my cathartic retort of such.
reply
share