ottomans and british
would an arab have any particular reason to prefer one or the other during the war? there was a promise of arab sovereignty, which the brits (and french) propmptly reneged upon immediately after, and threw in a jewish mandate as a cherry on top, but during the war, perhaps that would have been seen as the better option for arabs anxious to throw off the ottoman yoke.
what i'm wondering is if in the context of the film, there was such a pro-british shading, or if all that was irrelevant to the honor aspect.
theeb didn't betray the bandit to the revolutionaries, but once the bandit cashed in his booty, theeb was ready to execute him.
or was it simply that to betray him would be dishonorable, but to execute him just. that's certainly understandable, but the timimg coming immediately after cashing in certainly had to mean something.
what i'm interested in, if possible, is an actual informed arab/arabist perspective, not another semi-educated american interpreting, as i am.