MovieChat Forums > Ballet 422 (2014) Discussion > Hate to be negative, but...

Hate to be negative, but...


I'm afraid the good reviews will cause more horrible documentaries about good subjects to be made.

It seems this film maker went in with one goal: the "fly-on-the-wall" approach. And apparently that's something that is currently in vogue with critics.

The first problem is he doesn't even achieve that, the people involved are clearly aware of the camera's presence. It's not so bad for the performers who are used to being watched but the behind the scenes creative people often seem awkward. Even crappy reality TV shows by using omnipresent video cameras achieve the effect better than this film.

But the bigger problem is without any context, all the attention to detail is meaningless. It's like watching a painter mix a color without knowing what it's going to be used for in a painting. Or a writer agonize over which word to use without reading the sentence it's going to be put into.

Instead of making the process seem impressive, it becomes tedious. Instead of using the knowledge of all the work that goes into a ballet to make the final work all the more interesting, we get more tedium, and a long shot of the choreographer walking down a hallway (WTF?!).

Obviously the film maker isn't at all interested in this choreographer's artistic vision for this particular ballet at all, just a hipster cool fly-on-the-wall look at "ballet". It's a film made for people who would never sit through a ballet, but want to feel like they are the kind of person who would.

The film ends with what could have been a great surprise: that while staging this ballet, this brand new choreographer also had to learn a ballet to perform on the same night! There were 2 choices, show this fact all through the documentary to show what an amazing feat this was, or make it a big surprise at the end using film technique to make it awe inspiring with flashbacks to his grueling schedule. Instead it is THROWN AWAY leaving many viewers baffled because it doesn't even seem possible. So what we get instead is a ridiculously long shot of the venue exterior at twilight?! Again the film maker is putting his own interests (sorry it's a pretty shot but not THAT interesting) above the work of the brilliant talents involved in making the final piece that we barely get to see at all.

*
Ambient, Experimental & Neo-classical Music : http://mrdreamstream.bandcamp.com/

reply

I have to agree the end was lame. I hated it. Even worse, instead of playing the correct music for the second ballet (Shostakovich for Concerto DSCH) they played Bizet's Symphony in C. I don't think Justin "just learned" Concerto DSCH. I'm sure he's known it for quite awhile. But I thought they should have ended with Justin's full piece, Paz de la Jolla. Well, Jody Lee Lipes is no Frederick Wiseman. And for all his protesting about not knowing ballet, he is married to Ellen Bar, a soloist with NYCB until she retired 2-3 years ago and now head of media operations. You can thank Ellen for this movie getting shown to the public at all.

reply

I've learned heaps more about dance by watching YouTube videos, such as those produced by The Royal Ballet. I expected at least that the choreographer's creative process would be discussed, but he seemed to keep his thoughts to himself, and/or wasn't engaged to speak by the filmmaker, so we never get to know the subject of the film. The orchestra apparently doesn't know him either, and there's more personality on display from a ditsy-sounding costumer than anyone else. So this doc is sort of pointless, and unlikely to change the mind of anyone who thinks of ballet as boring or a distant, elitist artform.

Instead of this, for anyone curious about choreography development and the discipline it takes to be a part of this world, I'd recommend watching live-recorded footage from World Ballet Day or rehearsal videos online. AOL (!) even did a series called "city.ballet" that revealed much more about ballet culture at NYCB.

reply