MovieChat Forums > The Game (2014) Discussion > Why are Reality Spy Movies or serise so ...

Why are Reality Spy Movies or serise so boring?


Who among IMdb fans has not seen many or most of the endless fantasy OO7 ‘’spy’ movies? Absurd ‘works of art’ adorned with fabulously ‘hot’ looking young women, never nude. God forbid, nary a glimpse of bare feminine breasts (American audience needed by European producers for blockbuster results so keep in mind seeking no worse than a PG-13 rating). Traditional 007 type ‘Spy’ movies bordering on comic and not to be taken seriously, are full of polished mayhem and implied super-soft sex action not forgetting the inevitable villains drawn from central casting, usually with evil Continental or highly-educated British accents. One has to admit that the end result was usually highly entertaining.
Then came the many attempts at Spy reality movies; The ‘Gorky Park’ or ‘Russia House’ type, although ‘The Spy that Came in from the Cold’ dates back to 1965 and is a boring as the rest of this sub-species of the main Spy genre.
I have only just finished watching Episode 1 of The Game series set in the unremarkable and best forgotten 1970s when maxi-skirts, feminine wigs and dark brown and avocado green colours were the fashion. Meanwhile, the fond memory of Britain’s ‘ Swinging Sixties’ was already fading.
The series begins with a young couple strolling among woods along the dismal banks of a Polish river. However, the sets and outdoor scenes are mostly set in central London displaying damp miserable and chilly looking November streets and sleazy workmens’ clubs with unfunny stand-up comedians.
The theme among the Soviet enemy seems to be the nasty murderous and pasty–faced KGB agents who tend to peel apples with deadly looking daggers and the gossip at MI5 that the Kremlin is 'obviously' developing something that is not good at all. Back home at MI5 the main concern is ‘there is a Mole among us at M15, who is it?” , and for some i t narrows to 'where are ther other plain looking female MI5 assitants (no Judy Dench like bosses) to bed with for lack of anything better to do in the evening. The only half-decent looking woman so far shown expires in the first ten minutes of the pilot episode. There is a scrap of fantasy and a grain of unexciting ‘sexual romance between the sheets in a drab 1970s bedsitter but Episode was sadly lacking the James Bond glitter and humour.

reply

Because being a spy is 99% boring. The best spies are nondescript people who blend into the background and rarely resort to violence because they are incredibly careful about not putting themselves into situations where they might need to resort to violence. The 1% of the time where the feces hit the fan and things get hectic doesn't make up the other 99% of boring drudgery.

reply

Spot on. They're not meant to stand out. They are the average Joe or Jane and they must fit with their usually very mundane cover.

reply

So, Politicon, how would you have made this episode better?

reply

I love espionage movies. They may have a formula but I still love them. Rom-coms have a formula and many people never tire of them. I think this is a well made production with thrills and suspense. I am hooked with the first episode and Tom Hughes.

reply

Bond can be fun popcorn movies, (when they aren't too absurdly silly, because many of them are). But some of the best spy stories are the ones with a more realistic bent (such as "The Spy who Came in from the Cold", "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy", "Our Man in Havana", and several others).

Bond is really an entirely different genre -- they are not thrillers, they are action-adventure stories, as opposed to spy thrillers. They are not meant to be at all cerebral, but are the kind of movies where you can safely turn off your brain and simply enjoy the ride. Spy thrillers are different -- they are meant to keep you guessing, to actually be suspenseful.

Suspense has almost become a lost art in American cinema, unfortunately. Every once in a while, a true suspense movie comes along. The problem is that the whole 'turning off your brain' popcorn movie part of it means that such films are much easier to make from a writing and acting standpoint. When special effects and stunts and over-the-top grimacing villains become your stars, The writing, far too often takes a back seat (not always -- a couple of the recent Bond movies have actually been quite good). But for every 10 or 100 "Moonraker"s, you only get one or two "The Spy who Came in from the Cold".

reply

This is the opposite of bond. More like tinker tailor soldier spy...which was awsome. But of course it is all about what entertains you, right?. I just watched a bond something, didn't even catch which one, but I was bored. It felt silly and a waste of good time, the acting was , well bad is kind...but, I have seen most of them and enjoyed them. I loved them as a kid.
I think alot of it is about the time you watch something..for me it is. I tried twice to watch this series last week and was not in the right mood. Tonite I can't get enough...who's to say??? It is so personal..But my guess is that this is getttig "rave" reviews...tits and ass or not ..lol...

reply

They seem boring to you and others just because you are raised to like "Captain America".. There's nothing wrong with that, provided you don't define "boring" with that in mind.

reply

I guess it depends on what you look for in a movie? If you want special effects and witty banter, stick with James Bond. If you want a well written story go with Le Carre, Deighton or Graham Green. "The Spy Who Came in From the Cold", "The Ipcress File" and "The Third Man" are rightly regarded as classics. "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy" and "Game, Set and Match" are two of the best mini-series ever aired. The movie version of "Tinker Tailor...", "Russia House", "The Constant Gardener" and " A Most Wanted Man" are modern masterpieces. Maybe you have become so used to special effects as a substitute for plot in most modern movies and TV that you've grown addicted to it. I'll grant you "The Game" isn't Graham Green, but it is much better plotted than most of the over actioned, under written crap on the tube. I see you prefer the American custom of casting most female roles with super models instead of the British custom of casting them with actors who look like people.

reply

The Honourable Woman which recently aired had about an hour's worth of solid Spycraft in it. Hugh was the best spy since Neil and George.

I think my percentage of Chimp DNA is higher than others. Cleaver Greene

reply

Similarly, did anyone watch the short series "Assets" about Aldrich Ames? We all know how that ended, but it was so well-written and full of spycraft that I was on the edge of my seat anyway. Even the drudgery was admirable because you knew how it was a means to an end.

I wish they hadn't cancelled that series because the writing was good. But, American in the age of reality TV, it was bound to fail, as too many other good shows out there.

reply

How sad for you. I hope you save this write-up, for when you've grown up a bit. Just so you can see how ditsy you were way back in 2014.

reply

I don't find the more realistic spy series to be boring ... if they're well done.

The Sandbaggers, a show that hasn't been mentioned here, is a prime example of how a show that's mainly about the machinations that go on within the office setting can be quite riveting.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077078/

reply