Not going to see it, but not bothered by pandering to Asian audience

I don’t think they need pandain bec ze panda is there official mascot

Is a movie pandering to a white audience if all the actors in it are white?

Seems to me that these days there are lots of positive representations of Asian appearing people that don't acknowledge any ethnicity at all.
I think Sandra Oh had a significant part in the great movie Sideways. That she was Asian appearing didn't seem to come up.
I don't watch the TV show Elementary, but I'm guessing Lucy Liu isn't seen as some exotic Asian woman, I'm thinking she's just a colleague and foil for Sherlock, and a svelte, foxy one at that.
Asians are very well integrated (at least to me) but it takes time for Love To See No Color.
If CRA is some sort of step forward for society -- Great !

To me, "pandering to" has a negative connotation.
I would say the movie primarily caters to a particular audience, and there's no thing wrong with that.

You're an idiot.

Instead of watching Fox News on a loop, how about you educate yourself about the fallacy of the "Model Minority" myth that racist Whites use to excuse their racism against Blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans.

. . . I explained that comparisons between blacks and Asian Pacific Americans (APAs) overlook a number of differences between them. Whereas the black population represents a cross-section of background, the APA community is highly self-selected. Voluntary migrants from nations that are not contiguous to their country of destination tend to have the skills and money needed to leave their home country in the first place. As many scholars have found, Asian immigrants are largely drawn from an occupational and educational elite in their countries of origin.

Indeed, Asian success in the U.S. relative to others is largely due to immigration policies that favor immigrants with pre-existing skills and education. As the Glass Ceiling Commission discovered in 1995, between two-thirds and three-quarters of the highly educated APA community already had college degrees before coming to the U.S., or were in college upon arrival. Thanks to preferences for educated immigrants, APAs are two-thirds more likely than whites and three times more likely than blacks to have a college degree. More than 8 in 10 Indian immigrants from 1966-1977 had advanced degrees and training in such areas as science, medicine or engineering.

Pre-existing educational advantages are implicated in Asian success, but hardly indicate genetic or cultural superiority. After all, to claim superior Asian genes or culture as the reasons for achievement in the U.S. requires one to ignore the rampant poverty of persons from the same backgrounds in their countries of origin. There is no shortage, after all, of desperately poor Asians in the slums of Manila, Cal

I think you meant "undue," not "undo." Completely different meaning there.