Yet another English classic ruined by the BBC, it was excruciating, likened to watching paint dry. The acting was monotonous in the extreme and highly embarrassing to witness, pacing was glacial and rather than illicit a sense of Gothic suspense the viewer slumbers through yet another BBC flop.
When will the BBC begin to employ decent writers?
Recently all the best BBC drama has been produced externally so exactly WHERE is our licence fee cash going? American television make the BBC look like dreadful amateurs who seem incapable of producing quality programming.
A ton of people are complaining that they couldn't understand people, which is a shame because now they just won't watch. And it will hurt word of mouth, no pun intended.
What a way for an otherwise good production to be sabotaged. By the sound department!
I expect to love it whenever I get to see it. Glad to see some people really liked it. The early reviews (by those who got to pre-screen it) were very positive, especially for the lead actors. Maybe somehow they had better sound quality?
I know some are complaining about other stuff but honestly, 80% of the criticisms I saw were about the sound.
OK, so I found a way to watch it and I don't see how people could not understand the dialogue. I am American and I had no trouble understanding it. I had to pay attention, but not even that hard. The one exception is the guy playing Joss. He mumbles too much. But there were only a few spots where I couldn't understand him and I got his gist well enough.
The acting is excellent, as is the music and cinematography. I would say Mary stalks off one time too many and I could have done with one fewer shots of her alone in a see of tall grasses. I get it: she's isolated. But that's just one quibble.
I hope most are coping with the help of subtitles as necessary.
I like the way the landscape means so much to these people - freedom, an escape and a refuge, but a place that can kill you in a moment. Joss' story about watching his brother die is a key element in the story, I think.
Dreadful, the pacing was wrong and the performance entirely monotonous with endless scenes of Mary Yellan stomping to and fro from the moors, utterly utterly dreadful.
He's drunk most of the time - that's as he should be. I didn't personally find him hammy; I thought the actor gave a very fair impression of the character.
Couldn't agree more. The book doesn't feel the need to show everything like the hanging of the man, it goes for subtleties and is all the more powerful for it. I will never understand why the writers adapting things think they can do better than the original material and alter just about everything...Am surprised the sound is the only thing people criticised about this.
It's not the only thing they criticized. But the writing hasn't been singled out for attack so much as the lighting and stylistic choices. And Sean Harris' muttering.
Not rubbish at all - atmospheric, with fascinating characters and a truly modern twist or three on a classic story. Bringing the truly disturbing quality of Du Maurier's story fully to life.
As for it being in the dark - well, I imagine most viewers had no trouble at all seeing what happened, even if they struggled with the problems that were apparently being experienced with the sound.