MovieChat Forums > Jamaica Inn (2015) Discussion > Glacial, Incompetent Rubbish

Glacial, Incompetent Rubbish


Yet another English classic ruined by the BBC, it was excruciating, likened to watching paint dry.
The acting was monotonous in the extreme and highly embarrassing to witness, pacing was glacial and rather than illicit a sense of Gothic suspense the viewer slumbers through yet another BBC flop.

When will the BBC begin to employ decent writers?

Recently all the best BBC drama has been produced externally so exactly WHERE is our licence fee cash going?
American television make the BBC look like dreadful amateurs who seem incapable of producing quality programming.


reply

How's the acting?

reply

It was all quite wonderful. Caught Du Maurier's sense of place and character - and the acting is first rate. Beautifully done - highly absorbing.

I think I'll be re-reading the book this week...

reply

A ton of people are complaining that they couldn't understand people, which is a shame because now they just won't watch. And it will hurt word of mouth, no pun intended.

What a way for an otherwise good production to be sabotaged. By the sound department!

I expect to love it whenever I get to see it. Glad to see some people really liked it. The early reviews (by those who got to pre-screen it) were very positive, especially for the lead actors. Maybe somehow they had better sound quality?

I know some are complaining about other stuff but honestly, 80% of the criticisms I saw were about the sound.

OK, so I found a way to watch it and I don't see how people could not understand the dialogue. I am American and I had no trouble understanding it. I had to pay attention, but not even that hard. The one exception is the guy playing Joss. He mumbles too much. But there were only a few spots where I couldn't understand him and I got his gist well enough.

The acting is excellent, as is the music and cinematography. I would say Mary stalks off one time too many and I could have done with one fewer shots of her alone in a see of tall grasses. I get it: she's isolated. But that's just one quibble.

I look forward to tomorrow night.

reply

I hope most are coping with the help of subtitles as necessary.

I like the way the landscape means so much to these people - freedom, an escape and a refuge, but a place that can kill you in a moment. Joss' story about watching his brother die is a key element in the story, I think.

reply

How's the acting?

Dreadful, the pacing was wrong and the performance entirely monotonous with endless scenes of Mary Yellan stomping to and fro from the moors, utterly utterly dreadful.





reply

The acting is good. Maybe you just dont like costume dramas......

reply

The acting is good. Maybe you just dont like costume dramas......


I love costume drama's and English history; however, increasingly they seem to be produced better by the cousins.

reply

I love costume drama's and English history; however, increasingly they seem to be produced better by the cousins.


Rubbish.

reply

Terrible, the dialogue from the male lead is completely inaudible

reply

Now HE was the only one I had trouble understanding and was the weak spot,. Too hammy. He acted simple-minded or something.

The others I thought were very good.

reply

He's drunk most of the time - that's as he should be. I didn't personally find him hammy; I thought the actor gave a very fair impression of the character.

reply

Read the book

reply

Couldn't agree more. The book doesn't feel the need to show everything like the hanging of the man, it goes for subtleties and is all the more powerful for it. I will never understand why the writers adapting things think they can do better than the original material and alter just about everything...Am surprised the sound is the only thing people criticised about this.

reply

It's not the only thing they criticized. But the writing hasn't been singled out for attack so much as the lighting and stylistic choices. And Sean Harris' muttering.

reply

Mumble, mumble, stumble in the dark - the acting quality and terrible lighting.

Absolute rubbish.

reply

Not rubbish at all - atmospheric, with fascinating characters and a truly modern twist or three on a classic story. Bringing the truly disturbing quality of Du Maurier's story fully to life.

As for it being in the dark - well, I imagine most viewers had no trouble at all seeing what happened, even if they struggled with the problems that were apparently being experienced with the sound.

reply

I liked it

reply

Me too. Looking forward to part 2 tonight.

reply

[deleted]