MovieChat Forums > Tim's Vermeer (2014) Discussion > Did it take Vermeer 130 days to paint hi...

Did it take Vermeer 130 days to paint his paintings?


I really enjoyed this documentary and found it quite interesting, but I agree with others that it could have been better at showing the other side as well. Anyways, Tim took 130 days to paint his Vermeer recreation, did it take Johannes Vermeer as long to paint his originals? I assume since Tim is an amateur painter, especially compared to Vermeer, that it would have taken Vermeer less time in general, but he also didn't have access to modern equipment like head-clamps. What do you think?

reply

Vermeer wasn't a terribly prolific artist. There are only 35 known paintings in existence; with that in mind, and considering the unparalleled amount of detail in his compositions, it's safe to assume he took much longer to build up his canvases... unrestricted by a filming schedule, some paintings no doubt stretched on for years until they achieve a "finished" state (for artists, are the artworks ever really finished?).

Tim's "Vermeer" was great--especially the carpet/blanket, which, frankly, rivals the old masters in quality of execution (I agree with the historian near the end of the film when he said, somewhat hyperbolically, "That's better than Vermeer"--but the overall painting wasn't nearly as polished as Vermeer's. Some painting skill can't be figured out so quickly. Much of Tim's painting, though beautiful, had a flatness to it.

It's difficult to tell for certain how much time was spent on each element of the composition, but it's obvious in the film that Tim spent a remarkable amount of time on that carpet; Vermeer, or other seasoned artists, would have spent equally as much time on every element in the composition, because there's just as much nuance and detail everywhere. (Tim realized fairly late in the game that simply "free form painting" the carpet, without all of the individual knots, wouldn't have been as impressive--however, it's clear that other elements suffered the fate of being less detailed.) I noticed Tim's stringed instrument (the one on the ground) was fairly flat; Vermeer would have labored over that for weeks in and of itself, slowly building up nuance layer by layer, achieving the minuscule grains in the wood itself.

I thought the documentary was stellar and I'm totally impressed with what Tim accomplished. Brilliant stuff!

reply

Good notes and I'm glad you can see how to criticize his technique without discrediting the whole film like some have done. It's easy to imagine after watching this film that Vermeer with some experience painting could adapt this technique to further enhance it, as well as enlist the help of some assistants to take his composition and start building the layers for him... This would then account for the 35 pieces. Not incredibly prolific, but not the 3 years each that Tim took.

reply

[deleted]

Head clamps are hardly "modern equipment." They have been in use by portrait artists for hundreds of years.

reply

Being a skilled artist Vermeer could probably paint in some areas more quickly, you can also see he's taken some shortcuts, I'd argue Tim exceeded Vermeer in his rendition of the blanket for example and in the hanging painting on the wall.

reply