MovieChat Forums > Count Arthur Strong (2013) Discussion > Radio Show is pure Genius, this is not.

Radio Show is pure Genius, this is not.


The radio show is absolute pure comedy genius, Count Arthur Strong is the best character since Alan Partridge!

But the TV show, while not bad, is not a patch on the radio show, why did they change it so much? They should have just re-done 6 of radio shows for the TV series, would that have been so hard?

I have also seen Count Arthur live, and it was the funniest thing i have ever experienced.

The TV show is just average, bit like Not going out or something like that. Watchable but not comedy genius!




'You are receiving this broadcast as a dream.'

reply

I've seen Count Arthur Strong on stage - on a cold winter's night with only about two hundred people in a theatre with a capacity five times that but he was indeed hilarious - particularly his little tiny King Tut 'ventriloquist' routine. Because he was the dominant force - he had Malcolm, dropped from the TV show and a man who was supposedly an understudy in 'Dad's Army' but he was the star of the show. Here he was not. The sad thing is that Delaney and Linehan,who have written this abysmal TV version, did the radio series. As you say, they should have adapted those scripts and spared Rory Kinnear's blushes.

reply

you're right about count arthur strong being up there with partridge and he should have been given the same respect and treatment that iannucci brought to partridge. watching delany's performances are a thing of comedic beauty but here it is tainted by it's bland, mediocre surroundings.

reply

[deleted]

this is the best thing I have seen on TV for years. I have watched each episode 2-4 times. can't wait to get my hands on a radio CD compilation. if he were real I would have to have him as a friend.

reply

I had never heard of this show and didn't much like episode one of the tv show, but I stuck with it and soon realised how good it is, but only when Arthur is there. The radio rehearsal show was hilarious as was Arthur as a doctor in the hospital. The riots show was quite poor until it was completely redeemed by Arthur putting on a show. Thought the death of a character was unnecessary and obviously just not funny. The séance show was a bit of a let down laughs wise. Then this week I noticed that series 3 of the radio show was being repeated on Radio 4 extra. Listened to episode one, the book review, and its brilliant. I am pleased that the tv show enables me to visualise Arthur, as I think that helps make it funnier for me. I notice little bits of the script also turned up in the tv show, not always in the same context. I agree with those who think the tv show should all be about Arthur. Rory Kinnear is a good actor, better than his father, but is a complete fish out of water in this. Drop him and the café owner and sister, and eggy and the bald bloke. Arthur is a brilliant creation and I am so pleased I have discovered him on the radio now.

reply

Seance show? I nearly fell of my chair when he spoke of his round-the-house turban.

reply

I first saw the Count Arthur Strong character via a number of vignettes on the Paramount Channel (now Comedy Central) some 15 years or so ago. The scenario was the Count running a variety club with Terry Titter and they were highly amusing to say the least. Then followed a couple of appearances on late night BBC1 comedy shows and that was the last I saw of him until the last few weeks. You'll therefore gather that the radio show and his live performances have completely passed me by.

So when I became aware that there was to be a TV series and Graham Linehan was the co-writer it was my expectation that this was bound to be very good. Unfortunately it has been something of a disappointment, with the series as a whole varying between average to only mildly amusing. Since watching the TV series I've now listened to a few of the radio shows and there really is no comparison - the radio show is absolutely hilarious and it makes the ordinariness of the TV show even more apparent.

Now converting from radio to TV there were always going to be some changes but surely you don't tamper too much, if at all, with what actually makes the Count funny. Ridiculous rambling and irritable rants are Count Arthur Strong's raison d'etre, however, for the TV show they've been watered down to such an extent that they're barely there at all. They've seemingly chosen to make the Count more rounded, with more depth and more pleasant at the expense of virtually all of the laughs. Why the need to make him more real? At the end of the day he's a larger than life fictitious character. We don't expect him to be real! In addition the Michael character is virtually a co-star. This along with the other supporting characters only reduces the screen time on Arthur. So they've watered down his character and also effectively reduced his screen time. To me, that's clearly a lose lose outcome.

With his past TV sit com successes it would seem reasonable to assume that Linehan has had the lead role in shaping this program and so is more than likely the instigator of these character changes. The changes clearly haven't been successful. Although Linehan has an excellent track record, nobody has a monopoly on being right all of the time. Count Arthur Strong is, after all, Steve Delaney's creation so he should have more influence than I suspect he's had in this TV series.

As regards viewing figures I believe they started at around 1.1m and worked their way down to 800k or so, I don't know what the consolidated figures are. How good/bad these viewing figures are for the 2 slots that the show filled I'm not sure, although I'd guess that they're average at best and don't exactly scream out for a second series to be commissioned. It would be no surprise to me if the second series was actually agreed at the outset, possibly due to Linehan's clout?

For the second series they really need to return the Count to something more like his true character, as portrayed in the radio show, or the second series will surely be the final series. Lineham and Delaney are surely more than bright enough to realise that if you're travelling in the wrong direction making a u-turn is a much better option rather than just carrying on regardless and hoping for the best.

reply

yes but , no but.....I do believe it is beginning to 'catch on' that is to say I am looking forward to each episode. Not to be compared with Lee Mack's 'Not Going Out' really although there is something about the studio lighting and production in each case... I can't quite finger it?
Sort of deliberately low key which relates it to Variety and Music Hall which were never intended in their own time as Low Key but our collective memory sees it that way so there is a nostalgia about these shows unwittingly perhaps.

reply

I do think its getting better, the second series so far is an improvement on the first.

There was a new radio episode over Xmas, which was just genius!




"Uzi like a metal dck in my hand, Magazine like a big testicle gland" - Uzi Lover by Fur Q.

reply

I missed the xmas one! Was it definitely new?

reply

Yes brand new episode.

Its still on iplayer radio for a couple of days.





"Uzi like a metal dck in my hand, Magazine like a big testicle gland" - Uzi Lover by Fur Q.

reply

Series 2, Episode 4 in the TV show was just on the other day and is actually pretty decent. Felt More like classic count Arthur, had more of him in it, was more like a radio episode than the other tv shows so far.

The supporting cast let it down as usual, just filler in-between when count Arthur is onscreen.




"Uzi like a metal dck in my hand, Magazine like a big testicle gland" - Uzi Lover by Fur Q.

reply

Just about to watch it Marwood. Unfortunately I glimpsed a bit last night, and it was just the other characters talking in the cafe about Arthur.

Like you, I continue to be puzzled about their contribution to the show. Bring back Malcolm de Tinsel I say!

I understand your sign-off now. Genius bloke, didn't much like (Blue) Jam on TV though.

reply

Felt More like classic count Arthur, had more of him in it, was more like a radio episode than the other tv shows so far

The start with the psychological test was classic Arthur, the bits with Arthur and the 'plumber' were good. The rest? You probably know what I think about the rest.

reply

I had a free credit on Audible so got Arthur's audiobook "Through It All I've Always Laughed."

Five and a half hours of comedy gold, just the real Arthur start to finish.

Can't recommend it highly enough if you're a fan.

reply