MovieChat Forums > Sakasama no Patema (2013) Discussion > still confused about the geometry of the...

still confused about the geometry of the worlds



I just got out of the film, and the three (or four?) different worlds don't really make sense to me. There's Patema's home world, which is "underground". There's Age's home world, which during most of the film we're led to believe is the "aboveground" world. But then there's the sky city that they fall to where Patema's bag and Age's father's flying craft have both landed.

We learn in the story that what Age (and eventually Patema) think are stars are actually the lights on the buildings in the "sky city". But when the duo go to the sky city they never encounter anyone there, staying only a few minutes.

Then at the very end, the two rival groups of people are all hanging out together in yet another place that we haven't seen. They're looking at the ruins of an older city. But I was so confused by this point that I wasn't sure if that city was the "sky city" from before, some place "under" Patema's underground city, or something else altogether.


Anyone wanna help explain it to me?

reply

It was a bit confusing since at the end the expository dialogue went by so quickly in the English dub I saw. Maybe the subbed one allowed for more time to pick up the information. In any case, I was left wondering where the sky platform came from. It was the source of the "starlight" but also apparently the daylight, which was why it got so hot up there when "dawn" came. No one seemed to be living there.

I sort of got the idea then that the world "underneath" was the real world and an extension of the "upside-down" land beneath the long tunnel. So it looks like we have two worlds sitting on "top" of one another. Some information had to have been left out. sort of reminded me of the revelation in the anime Big O as to the sky.

reply

Ah, interesting! From the way it looked, I thought the "sky" was yet another city. The lights that looked from a distance like stars looked like lights on buildings up close. And the surface of that "sky" looked like buildings, too. If it was just meant to be fake stars and fake sun, it would be flat, not bumpy like the skyline of a city. And why would anyone take the time to write big labels on the "buildings" if nobody even lives there?

reply

It seems the writers skipped over things or the dialogue "explaining" the world just went by too quickly. We saw no one in the "sky platform" and nobody had discovered Age's father's flying device that flew/dropped into it several years before. Plus the heat; it seemed the whole surface was radiating the heat needed to give the illusion of daylight to the world "below" and that would probably be too hot to live inside of. Probably need to get the DVD to figure it all out (at least in English).

reply

they produce the clouds there, thats why its bumpy

reply

I think I finally got a good mental picture of how it works. Picture the very end of the film.


orbiting planet with rings/ real sky


_____________Patema_^__________________
| |
| |
shaft
| |
patema's home
| |
__________________________________
| gov't bldg| Age v




______________'sky' city____________



Patema is the one right side up, her people are the scientists who charged themselves with taking care of Age's people. Age and his ppl are the real inverted. Age's entire mini-world is INSIDE the real one. Like an upside down truman show. The 'sky' city is what is generating the light and atmosphere for his underground world.

If you were to go to the edge of Age's world it would curve in on itself; it's a bubble inside the crust of the earth. The shaft was built to go from the surface to the fake world.

What I don't get it how they manufactured inverted stuff for the inverted ppl to use. And also how, if all the buildings 'fell', why are they on the surface of the real world?



Zoe Graves

"America: Freedom to Facism" and "Religulous"- watch them

reply

I think your picture sums it up quite nicely. As for your questions. All the inverted stuf was probably left over from the accident and moved underground or made from inverted raw materials.

As for the buildings on the surface of the real world that you see at the end. Those are not the inverted buildings just the ruins of the surface world after the accident. I think the ring around the moon that you see at the end is made up of all the debris that got inverted and fell up.

reply

That makes sense, thank you!


Zoe Graves

"America: Freedom to Facism" and "Religulous"- watch them

reply

This adds up, and the way I see it too. The only problem sort of is the particles flying from Age's World's direction towards the real world (UP) in the beginning when Patema stands at the edge. At the end however debris falls down from the same place.

reply

The debris falling down at the end is the broken concrete from the top of the shaft, it was not inverted. The particles falling up at the beginning were inverted.

reply

orbiting planet with rings/ real sky


________________________Patema_v______grass(surface of planet)______(v:normal gravity)
| | (below surface) crust
| |
shaft
| |
patema's home
| |
________________crust_______________________________
| gov't bldg| Age ^ (^: reverse gravity)




________floating 'sky' city________




____ center of planet_____

reply

We were inside the planet the whole time. Patema and her people were right-side up, while Age and his world were the inverted ones.

Can't stop the signal.

reply

I was also surprised at the scarcity of geometry explanations in the movie- and this was clearly intentional. Some people believed it was all "fuzzy" or "not thought though"- while in fact the picture is entirely coherent, and the authors leave enough clues to put it together- but they simply choose not to explicitly elaborate in the movie. Paradoxically, this basically pulls the movie away from a harder-core SF content, into the soft of the interpersonal relationships- this was probably their intent.

This is a typical "hollow earth setup"- of course, this was never Earth, but a space habitat/colony, entirely artificial (don't let the grass fool you, the skeleton is made of metal) - as suggested by the nearby planet with a debris ring orbiting it (possibly a consequence of the same gravitational catastrophe). Agee's world lives on the inner side of this shell, while at the very end the characters punch through the metal shell and reach the true outside surface of this habitat- where the collapsed building are scattered.The "inner sky is in fact a device/factory located at the nucleus of this spherical shell- that serves as a "luminary" for the inner crust world- a central sun. At some point, the two characters flee that surface which was getting warmer and warmer - the sun was switching on in the morning.

So the story could be like this: people were inhabiting this colony, on the usual outer side, with normal gravity. At some point, they decided they have to move to the inside of the shell, and use a central "sun" (which clearly had to be built beforehand with this purpose in mind) - but for this you either need rotation ( a la G. O'Neil space settlements) or some reverse gravity. When this happened, the buildings and the people on the outer surface were repelled into the sky- probably for a short while, until the experiment was terminated and the buildings collapsed back onto the ground. The only people that survived were those inside the crust of the colony, in the tunnels. Also, a group of people were permanently inverted - had a"mutation" that would pull them towards the outside of the planet, rather than to the inside. These were Agee's people. This is reminiscent of Christopher Priest's novel "Inverted world" - with the hyperboloidal gravity.

So the irony is: the actual "inverted" people are the "puritans" in Agee's city - that is why they fall into the real sky once exposed to the true, outer surface- while the tunnel people are the survivors of the "normal" humans, the ones that could live on the outer surface. Other inversions: Agee's surface is not the real surface ( "the real world" as the picture says), the sky is not real, the sun they see during the day is actually a machine, the stars are the safety lights of this at nighttime, the clouds are the smoke output of the nucleus factory, the people that reverse fall into the sky are actually Agee's people, not the others (which simply fall down)- so all the original expectations are actually inverted at the end: the "normal-looking" folks are actually the mutants, and the underdogs in the tunnels are the "original" = "normal inhabitants". Interesting that the movie did not want to emphasize all these nuances, leaving the conclusions for the spectators -as a SF fan, I am particularly puzzled.

reply

OK, enough people have replied with an explanation that I now get that the geometry of the worlds wasn't what it appears, and wasn't well-explained. But it leaves me thinking of this: From a story telling perspective, what's the point of all this? If it takes someone two long paragraphs to explain the setting to someone who saw the whole film, something's wrong. The film is a fairy tale about relationships, bigotry, taking chances, etc. And the setting is just there because you've gotta have SOME setting.

It feels like all this "oh the irony that it's the OTHER people who are upside-down" is just a midichlorian *beep* It doesn't add to the story, and in fact detracts from the telling of it. Do we the audience really need to know this clever irony to appreciate the story? No. It just feels clever for clever's sake to me. Maybe that's a cultural thing. I don't know.

reply

Fair enough- but then anybody can derive his own interest from the material.
I personally was not that interested in the story itself, and the romance of the two youngsters. After all, if it's Verona or another galaxy, Romeo and Juliet are sort of the same anywhere... and totalitarian-like societies, we've seen plenty around... I was more attracted to the hand-waving way of suggesting the true nature of reality, and to the use of the "inversion" terminology for social commentary. Inversion lends itself naturally to this (just like in that other Upside Down movie)

reply

I like how you think about movies. Agreed or whatever, it was a good review.

reply

The geometry of the worlds wasn't that confusing or overly convoluted. I mean I'm with you that I think movies that are TOO convoluted and leave too many questions are irritating, with directors that say, "Gee the ending's what you want it to be!" drive me crazy, but this really wasn't that. It was explained all it needed to be. There was the friggin' moon after all, and there was the guy telling you they built a thingie underground to give those inverts a fake sky. All you needed to do (or I needed to do) was pause for a second, think about it, and get on with my life. What would YOU have wanted, twenty minutes of film showing you the actual building of the underground star-platform-sun-light? (Actually I wouldn't have minded that because the film was so pretty to look at anyway.)

And the "They were upside-down the whole time" twist isn't just just overly-clever garbage that detracts from the story. Again I'm with you at disliking clever-twist garbage, and oh dear sweet Jebus I frakking HATE midi-chlorians!! >.< But considering the people who were most bigoted, talking about sinners falling into the sky and crap like that, were actually the ones who fell into the sky... it's, uh, kind of a big lesson about humanity and bigotry. I mean maybe the fault was that the movie didn't stress the bigotry enough for the reveal to have impact for you, but the reveal itself is definitely not gimmicky. If it were a movie about a guy who was born blind and going on his whole life about how black people were inherently evil scum and should be exterminated, then at the end he gets his your sight back suddenly gasp! HE'S black! It would kind of be a shocking life-lesson.

So maybe you can say you don't want incredibly on-point life-lessons in your animated movies, okay, but you can't just call it clever irony garbage. ;)

- - -

Whether they find life there or not, I think Jupiter should be considered an enemy planet.

reply

Erm, interesting theory... but you're completely wrong. It's clearly earth and that's clearly the MOON, not a ringed planet. That's the moon which has picked up the debris from the things that fell into space when their gravity was inverted.

Also the paper the old fella's holding at the end talks about reversing the gravity mistake and setting things back to normal. I mean there's not much there, but that's what it's saying.

So they're not leaving a lot of things unexplained and failing to "emphasize nuances," you've just made a lot of unsubstantial leaps and nuances on your own. Nothing in the movie suggests that it's a hollow earth/space station, except for your ringed planet, which as I say again... is clearly the moon.

- - -

Whether they find life there or not, I think Jupiter should be considered an enemy planet.

reply

This picture helped me make sense lol

http://i.imgur.com/ZMZ3UwY.jpg

reply

That makes sense but how is that climate control? How do you know this? It's logicalbut I don't recall them explaining it?

Also it's all completely nonsensical but suspension of disbelief I guess, still a fun movie.

reply

From my viewpoint, Age and his people are inverted. Patema and her people are normal human beings like you and me. Age's city are built inside the planet, specifically the inner side of the surface. Earlier after escaping from the tip of the tower, he and Patema reached an artificial star system floating between planet shell and the center of the planet. The end scene, they reached the surface of the planet, everyone can see the real star system and real sky. Patema can run on the grass because she is normal. Without holding her, Age would float away into the real sky.

reply

Bingo.

Let's be bad guys.

reply