Two gapping plot holes.

this movie is a noble effort, but it makes choices or errors that are hard to overlook. one is that if the family really had a curse of bad luck, then nothing good would ever happen for them and that they wouldn't be able to really live happy lives at all. despite that, i think the part about the dad finding errors in machines using the bad luck was really clever though, even though his bad luck should actually prevent him from doing so instead. another is more of a criticism of a choice made by the writer, but still really matters. i know the writer was going for a moral of be who you are and don't change if you're happy, but if the curse was created through the means of a dispute (for dumb reasons come to think of it) between the Murphys and the O'Learys/Murrays, then why not make it so that the resolution/reconciliation of that dispute by the ancestors would not just reverse the curse, but break it forever? if they'd had the coin fall into the fountain while Meg and Brett kissed and the curse be broken as a result, that would have worked so much better. plus, the moral could have instead been that you're allowed to overcome the obstacles in life that prevent you from being happy as long as you acknowledge that you have to face them and not avoid them. not acknowledging why that idea couldn't work in a convincing and believable way left me with a dissatisfied feeling in the end because of it. this didn't have to be a perfect movie in any way, it just needed to be more coherent. Swindle actually had much more consistent and thoughtful writing and that is what made it surprisingly good. it looks as though those who worked on Jinxed tried, but not hard enough.