MovieChat Forums > Obvious Child (2014) Discussion > 'You don't owe him anything'... really??

'You don't owe him anything'... really??


I'm not opposed to abortion. I've thought it over for years and I think it has to be allowed, and don't denigrate anybody's decisions on whether or not to go through with one. So let's get that out of the way...

But I don't get where this attitude comes from. The idea that men have absolutely no say at all in such a matter is a bizarre forgone conclusion for a lot of people. The idea that the man cannot weigh in or have a right to contribute to the decision is strange to me considering the same people usually want the men to accept full responsibility with regards to the decision after it's made. It's just strange to me. Whatever the decision may be it will alter the all the lives of the people involved. It's just odd that it's this clear social contract for some people that it's a woman's body so it's her choice and her's alone and men have no rights in this regard.

I haven't seen the film so I don't know of this is the attitude it takes. I just heard that line in a clip.

reply

So a woman gets pregnant and want to keep the kid, and the guy wants her to get an abortion, should she be forced to get one because of his input?

Women do get pressured to have abortions by their boyfriends.

reply

Of course not. How did you even get that from what I said?

If a woman gets pregnant and wants an abortion and he wants a child it's entirely her call? Or if she doesn't even tell him she's pregnant and then sues for child support two years later he should be forced to pay?

Obviously you can't force anyone to do anything, and it's ultimately the woman's call because she can't be physically forced or prevented from doing anything. But why it's somehow like a point of pride or something to not include the man's perspective on the decision or even have the conversation makes no sense to me. To not even tell somebody about something that will impact his life immensely is just irresponsible and inconsiderate.

reply

Legally it's the woman's call.....it's her body after all.

The man can try to influence the decision but ultimately it's her call.

reply

Obviously.

reply

Fair enough but don't drag the man to court later for child support. He wasn't involved in the decision to keep the child, so its only fair not to ask him for child support. It can't always be a one way street.

He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither ~ B. Franklin

reply

I think the point is....the guy uses the same argument in reverse. "Hey, it's your body, your problem." Many women have to go to court to get him to pay child support, if she keeps the child.

I think that most women notify the father at the early stages. But really, it IS her body. That's just the biology of it. He can run away from it. She can't.

I personally think the guy should probably not be consulted, unless they were a couple planning a life together already. He would try to influence her to get an abortion, would almost certainly not voluntarily offer child support, and preghant women are in a vulnerable state so MAY be unduly influenced (the hormones and the situation).

reply

Your talking about the rights of the man. If we give men this right, then they can sue to get more rights. When you go one extreme of making a woman not have an abortion because of his decision, you open up a can of worms that can go either way.

reply

Whatever the decision may be it will alter the all the lives of the people involved.

It's not going to alter the man's life if he never knows about it.


I haven't seen the film so I don't know of this is the attitude it takes. I just heard that line in a clip.

It would probably be better if you actually see a film before commenting on it, especially in this case.

Assume that in the set of men who get women pregnant, there's a continuum. On one end is a stranger who raped a woman and got her pregnant, and on the other end is a man in a healthy, committed, non-abusive relationship who has gotten his wife pregnant.

I don't think that both men are owed the same amount of say, or even the same amount of disclosure, if the woman is considering an abortion. And even if you're a hard-liner who thinks that neither deserves say or disclosure, you'd have to admit that one is a closer call than the other.

And once you start with that, you realize that every situation exists at a point on the continuum and is dealt with accordingly. The movie does this.






reply

The decision absolutely alters his life. Deciding not to tell him vs telling him sets two different courses in the lives of all involved.

"It would probably be better if you actually see a film before commenting on it, especially in this case."

I'm not commenting on the film. I'm commenting on a general social attitude. Do you people actually read before you respond? My god...

The rest of your post is basically useless and unrelated to anything that I've been trying to discuss.

reply

The decision absolutely alters his life. Deciding not to tell him vs telling him sets two different courses in the lives of all involved.

So what about my example of a rapist who gets a woman pregnant? Does his being a rapist mean his life, unlike everyone else's, is somehow unaltered by an abortion?

Maybe he doesn't deserve to know, but that doesn't mean his life isn't altered. If that's the case, then "altered life" isn't a valid standard.


I'm not commenting on the film. I'm commenting on a general social attitude. Do you people actually read before you respond? My god...

I don't know about anybody else, but yes, I actually read before I respond.

But if you're not commenting on the film, then perhaps a forum about this film is not the best place to start a discussion of general social attitudes, especially not this (allegedly) general social attitude, since as emvan points out, the film addresses a particular situation.

reply

A key fact here is that you had two strangers having a one-night stand, drunk out of their minds, who had tried heroically and repeatedly to do the condom thing, without even realizing at the time that they had failed. So the clear intention, specific to this boinking incident, is to not cause a pregnancy. You can argue that not even informing the guy is simply conforming to the original intentions, and furthermore, taking responsibility for the result, even if in fact the responsibility was shared.

I think that's different from, say, the couple in a relationship that has been using birth control and slip up, where there is the real possibility that one or the other has been contemplating having a child.

Prepare your minds for a new scale of physical, scientific values, gentlemen.

reply

"So what about my example of a rapist who gets a woman pregnant? Does his being a rapist mean his life, unlike everyone else's, is somehow unaltered by an abortion? Maybe he doesn't deserve to know, but that doesn't mean his life isn't altered. If that's the case, then "altered life" isn't a valid standard."

It's a horrible example. A rapist gives up his rights to essentially anything outside of prison when he commits a most heinous crime. This doesn't relate to the basic human decency I'm trying to discuss.

"But if you're not commenting on the film, then perhaps a forum about this film is not the best place to start a discussion of general social attitudes, especially not this (allegedly) general social attitude, since as emvan points out, the film addresses a particular situation."

It's absolutely a perfectly reasonable place to bring it up. Anytime a movie comes up that addresses a social or political issue the boards tend to reflect ideas relating to that issue. Completely reasonable and in no way out of the ordinary.

And it's interesting that you added 'alleged' since you seem to full share this notion.

"So the clear intention, specific to this boinking incident, is to not cause a pregnancy. You can argue that not even informing the guy is simply conforming to the original intentions, and furthermore, taking responsibility for the result, even if in fact the responsibility was shared."

You could argue that, and in the particular situation you might have more of a point, but it still sounds to me like an attempt to justify avoiding a brief awkward conversation.

"I think that's different from, say, the couple in a relationship that has been using birth control and slip up, where there is the real possibility that one or the other has been contemplating having a child."

Sure it's different, and of course the discussions would most certainly be different. But just take the same scenario the movie bases itself on, if the woman after a one night stand where contraception failed then decides she's keeping it, the man can be held equally responsible. The man is equally responsible for the result of the action, can be held equally responsible socially and financially for the child's life (if there is one), but has zero rights to have a say or even be informed about the decision. I'm not suggesting there needs to be a legal obligation to inform the man or anything, but why is this an assumption that men don't need to have the right to even know anything in this regard?

reply

You replied to the wrong person here. Try reposting and deleting.

Prepare your minds for a new scale of physical, scientific values, gentlemen.

reply

I replied to two people including you. No deletion necessary.

reply

The purpose of that scene was to show both sides of the issue. Obviously Donna did feel that she owed it to Max since she told him, but the film gives a few different perspectives and that's important. Things aren't always cut and dry and she doesn't necessarily owe him anything. It's a decision she needs to come to on her own, and she does.

reply

I agree with you, OP. Ultimately it is the woman's decision, but it is a violation of the man's rights to leave him out of the conversation. The baby is a result of both of their actions.

I think the extreme "you don't owe him anything" attitude is backlash for decades of men acting as if they had sole ownership of babies and women's bodies. If/when this anger blows over, people will realize that both male and female parties should be valued in the decision of whether to have an abortion or raise a child.

reply

I think it may have had to do with Gaby Hoffman's character having an abortion when she was a teenager. We're not given much insight into the relationship with her high school boyfriend/sexual partner and maybe regretted not telling him or received a bad reaction if she told him.

I think the statement added dimensions to her character.

reply

I personally found this movie to lack conflict and it's just sort of has an ugly attitude. Yes, the reality is that women have the right to choose and men have no power, which is fine whatever I'm pro-choice, but that doesn't make for an interesting movie. Drama calls for conflict, crisis and consequence. Jenny Slate's character never has any doubts about having an abortion, she doesn't have to fight for her abortion, and there's no consequences for her choice, her life doesn't change, she still gets her guy in the end. Maybe that's reality, but it's a missed opportunity for an interesting movie. All that's left is 80 minutes of fart jokes and a political statement I see on twitter every 20 minutes. 6/10

reply

Agreed! It would have been more interesting and realistic if she had been conflicted about the abortion. We didn't even see a moment where she considered keeping the baby- where she even considered the significance of having a baby growing inside of her. She was resolved from the beginning to have an abortion, and then she did it without a hitch. So what.

reply

The whole point of the movie was to show the other side.....most women don't feel conflicted about having an abortion in this type of circumstance....it was refreshing NOT to see the melodramatic conflicted feelings act.....it is how we want and expect women to feel rather than the way it really is.

reply

[deleted]

Fdog, I disagree with you that "most women don't feel conflicted about having an abortion" and that this is "how we want women to feel rather than the way it really is." I don't know anyone who has felt blase about having an abortion. It's not like getting a root canal. I believe in a woman's right to choose, and "choice" is a consideration of more than one path. I personally can't imagine not feeling conflicted if I had to make that decision. That would be the hardest decision of my life.

reply

I'm OK with it. I know how an abortion is performed.....I have seen an ultrasound. I don't like the idea of the government forcing a women to be pregnant at gunpoint.....unless you'd like to live in Iran.

reply