Ip Man vs Asian= Not a Scratch; Ip Man vs American= Thrashed + Bleedin
IP Man fights other chinese masters, not a scratch.
IP Man fights 15-20 armed thugs, not a scratch.
Ip Man fights elite Japanese fighters & Karate Master, not a scratch.
However, the moment Ip Man faces an American/Europen fighter, he's badly battered & bruised with internal bleeding and barely makes out of the fight alinve.
What the hell is wrong with this kind of discrepancy. π
Ip Man - fighting using punches, elbows, kicks, Knees, bare knuckled; is unable to stand up to a fighter who can only punch ??
I am by no means questioning the historical accuracy or reality aspect of these movies. It's for entertainment purposes of course.
What doesn't make sense is that in the first half of the movie, they make IP Man invincible, untouchable and then in the later half, he is whipped like a child.
Are they not going against their own concept or there is no concept here !!?
Have movie studio gone nuts ?! or Is there a hidden asian vs caucasian agenda here ? Whats the message they're trying to send..