It's understandable for women to get outraged though. Once sex bots are advanced enough it'll kill the only tool women have to garner power/attention. (Sex)
This was wrong. As in factually inaccurate, not morally or ethically wrong. Wrong as in "untrue".
I love it when people make unintentionally revealing posts. That sentence is all about you and nobody else.
This was right.
You either have your head very deep in your ass, you're extremely biased OR you haven't been put in any situations somewhat attractive women get put in. Which is basically a backhanded comment that assumes you're unattractive.
This was the backlash of someone so resentful and emotionally invested in his opinion that his ability to think logically or to recognize fallacies was severerly diminished. As proven by the personal attack, due to a lack of solid data to prove their point. This also showed deep resentment, but it can be expected or understood considering marriage and divorce laws nowadays.
Let's clarify what's wrong here:
It's understandable for WRONG WORD to get outraged though. Once sex bots are advanced enough it'll kill the WRONG WORD tool women have to garner power/attention. (Sex)
Correction:
It's understandable for
radical feminists and
golddiggers to get outraged though.
Radical feminists get outraged becuase "outrage" is what they do 24/7 (the idiocy of the attack on a scientist's shirt when a landmark hit in the space career was made comes to mind. I wanted to puke when they did that).
Gold diggers get outraged because sexbots will limit or destroy their possibilities of golddigging.
Women who do not accept invitations or money from strangers, who give back invitations regularly (no, I don't count how many times my husband pays or when I do, I counted at the beginning), pay for their stuff, get constant education and have qualified jobs, should have no problems with sex bots.
Women who think "I'm hot, so I will not study, or work, or do anything and hope for a guy to take care for me and pamper me and buy me a 10.000$ ring -an absolutely stupid waste of money- and pay for a wedding that includes a 2.500$ cake -an atrocious waste of money-, I'm hot, so worship me", are undoubtedly screwed.
What's wrong is saying "women" when you mean "this type of women".
Women who "do their homework", that is, develop their minds and personalities beyond the physical (being in physical peak shape by proper nutrition and exercise is simply proper personal development), have no problem with sexbots, just as we don't have any problem with
voluntary prostitution.
Actually, I have EXTREME hatred for forced prostitution (it's basically getting innocent or poor girls raped tens or hundreds of times for money, which is one of the most despicable things I can think of), so as I woman I LOVE the idea of proper sexbots which will save hundreds of innocent girls and women from being forced into prostitution. Some monsters will still rape, but any man who cannot find a willing woman, will be able to use a robot. I find that good news.
I like sexbots as I like voluntary prostitutes: they are doing a job most women do NOT want to do: because they do (or will do) it, some others will not be forced into doing it.
At the end of the day women get catered to solely because of their gender.
True, even for those of us who never accepted even an invitation to a lemon fanta. But that doesn't mean we enjoy the need to be catered. If I didn't go out unless there were guys from the group walking home on the same direction, it wasn't to abuse any privilege. It was because my chances of getting raped were much higher if I went home alone, because by age 15 I had been groped by strangers more times than should be normal (at 8, 10, 11 and 15). And that's just me, who was such a scaredcat that I wouldn't go out at night without company, at all (I was groped in broad daylight, which made me believe that the world was unsafe for me).
So, yes, we get catered because of our gender. However, if sexbots are going to be groped instead of 10-year old girls, and every guy who wants to get laid is going to get a sexbot, and my daughters will grow
without being groped at ages 8, 10 and 11, and rapes will become so rare that my 15 year old daughter will be able to go out at night without an escort, because the chances will be minimal... bring the sexbots, and let me pay my bills.
I'd rather have freedom than pampering. I don't know what it is to walk home at night feeling safe.
Every time a guy has paid for your meal, picked you up or did a favor for you he did that with the intention of getting laid.
I cannot know how guys think, and I went out of the market at 18, so I'm not going to discuss that. However, just as I think your "women are all X" is wrong to women, I think the "men are all X" is wrong to men, It's unfair.
I'm yearning to see how much of that is true. If a man getting constantly laid with a sexbot will still be "nice". I would bet many of my male and female friends will still continue doing favors" for one another. There will be just no leeches. Actually, the existence of sexbots will hurt only the dishonest and the leeches. Which will be good news. The selfish, who only want to use "others" will get out of the dating market. The selfish women, who only want to use men, will lose in the dating market. It's a win-win situation.
Once women lose that, they will have one hellacious problem on their hands.
Women
who leech on men, for sure. That subgroup only. Women who can manage their own money and treat men fairly will not have any problem.
Actually, it think it's going to be great for many women if sexbots like the ones in the movie become popular. As I said before, it'd be great to have a childhood free of fear of sexual attacks, and knowing that if a guy is nice to you, he is genuinely so, because he can *beep* his sexbot as much as he can.
So... I see why you're angry with the women that you refer to, but if your glee comes out of the notion that "Ooooh... sexbots are going to make women SO miserable!"... You're wrong. They will make many women free from sexual slavery, and will free others from a good part of opportunistic sexual attacks (those coming from attackers who are not total monsters or nutjobs), so many of us are rooting for them.
And, because of what you say about feminists opposing sexbots, I'll have to oppose them. Gah, I have to thank the feminists for the votes and other rights, but ever since the Rosetta incident I just can't stand some of them and their "outrageous-mode".
reply
share